Robert Redford 🇨🇦🇺🇸🇲🇽🇺🇦
@redford1.bsky.social
Private Investigator | Forensic Psych Major | #Forensics #Law
#Carney #Trump #Krasnov #Sheinbaum
#BoycottTesla TeslaTakedown.com
#Resist ✊ 🚫DMs 🇺🇦Slava Ukraini
#Carney #Trump #Krasnov #Sheinbaum
#BoycottTesla TeslaTakedown.com
#Resist ✊ 🚫DMs 🇺🇦Slava Ukraini
November 17, 2025 at 2:08 PM
November 17, 2025 at 2:02 PM
The door doesn't swing both ways.
You cannot sue the president acting in his official capacity.
How's that for unfair?
You cannot sue the president acting in his official capacity.
How's that for unfair?
September 24, 2025 at 12:28 PM
The door doesn't swing both ways.
You cannot sue the president acting in his official capacity.
How's that for unfair?
You cannot sue the president acting in his official capacity.
How's that for unfair?
Wrong.
A few "rapid science" studies HAVE shown a link, HOWEVER, the integrity of those studies is questioned by the majority of the science community. (larger field needed, longer time line, stricter controls, etc.)
In the meantime, "unlikely" rather than a definitive "no link exists" stands.
A few "rapid science" studies HAVE shown a link, HOWEVER, the integrity of those studies is questioned by the majority of the science community. (larger field needed, longer time line, stricter controls, etc.)
In the meantime, "unlikely" rather than a definitive "no link exists" stands.
September 24, 2025 at 12:28 PM
Wrong.
A few "rapid science" studies HAVE shown a link, HOWEVER, the integrity of those studies is questioned by the majority of the science community. (larger field needed, longer time line, stricter controls, etc.)
In the meantime, "unlikely" rather than a definitive "no link exists" stands.
A few "rapid science" studies HAVE shown a link, HOWEVER, the integrity of those studies is questioned by the majority of the science community. (larger field needed, longer time line, stricter controls, etc.)
In the meantime, "unlikely" rather than a definitive "no link exists" stands.
Wrong.
A few "rapid science" studies HAVE shown a link, HOWEVER, the integrity of those studies is questioned by the majority of the science community. (larger field needed, longer time line, stricter controls, etc.)
In the meantime, "unlikely" rather than a definitive "no link exists" stands.
A few "rapid science" studies HAVE shown a link, HOWEVER, the integrity of those studies is questioned by the majority of the science community. (larger field needed, longer time line, stricter controls, etc.)
In the meantime, "unlikely" rather than a definitive "no link exists" stands.
September 24, 2025 at 12:28 PM
Wrong.
A few "rapid science" studies HAVE shown a link, HOWEVER, the integrity of those studies is questioned by the majority of the science community. (larger field needed, longer time line, stricter controls, etc.)
In the meantime, "unlikely" rather than a definitive "no link exists" stands.
A few "rapid science" studies HAVE shown a link, HOWEVER, the integrity of those studies is questioned by the majority of the science community. (larger field needed, longer time line, stricter controls, etc.)
In the meantime, "unlikely" rather than a definitive "no link exists" stands.
September 24, 2025 at 12:28 PM
Wrong.
A few "rapid science" studies HAVE shown a link, HOWEVER, the integrity of those studies is questioned by the majority of the science community. (larger field needed, longer time line, stricter controls, etc.)
In the meantime, "unlikely" rather than a definitive "no link exists" stands.
A few "rapid science" studies HAVE shown a link, HOWEVER, the integrity of those studies is questioned by the majority of the science community. (larger field needed, longer time line, stricter controls, etc.)
In the meantime, "unlikely" rather than a definitive "no link exists" stands.
September 24, 2025 at 12:28 PM
Wrong.
A few "rapid science" studies HAVE shown a link, HOWEVER, the integrity of those studies is questioned by the majority of the science community. (larger field needed, longer time line, stricter controls, etc.)
In the meantime, "unlikely" rather than a definitive "no link exists" stands.
A few "rapid science" studies HAVE shown a link, HOWEVER, the integrity of those studies is questioned by the majority of the science community. (larger field needed, longer time line, stricter controls, etc.)
In the meantime, "unlikely" rather than a definitive "no link exists" stands.
Wrong.
A few "rapid science" studies HAVE shown a link, HOWEVER, the integrity of those studies is questioned by the majority of the science community. (larger field needed, longer time line, stricter controls, etc.)
In the meantime, "unlikely" rather than a definitive "no link exists" stands.
A few "rapid science" studies HAVE shown a link, HOWEVER, the integrity of those studies is questioned by the majority of the science community. (larger field needed, longer time line, stricter controls, etc.)
In the meantime, "unlikely" rather than a definitive "no link exists" stands.
September 24, 2025 at 12:27 PM
Wrong.
A few "rapid science" studies HAVE shown a link, HOWEVER, the integrity of those studies is questioned by the majority of the science community. (larger field needed, longer time line, stricter controls, etc.)
In the meantime, "unlikely" rather than a definitive "no link exists" stands.
A few "rapid science" studies HAVE shown a link, HOWEVER, the integrity of those studies is questioned by the majority of the science community. (larger field needed, longer time line, stricter controls, etc.)
In the meantime, "unlikely" rather than a definitive "no link exists" stands.
The smart money is reported to be on Germany.
September 23, 2025 at 12:33 AM
The smart money is reported to be on Germany.