Remy Green (they/them)
@remygreen.bsky.social
★ a queer civil rights lawyer who writes, professors, babbles, is obsessed with their cats, wrongly puts two spaces after periods, &c. ★ honorific/pronouns: Mx./they/them/their ★
Shit, forgot alt text (I swear I have the “don’t let me post without alt text on, not sure what happened).
It’s a picture of Eric Adams.
It’s a picture of Eric Adams.
December 5, 2025 at 5:02 PM
Shit, forgot alt text (I swear I have the “don’t let me post without alt text on, not sure what happened).
It’s a picture of Eric Adams.
It’s a picture of Eric Adams.
For real. Our office ScanSnap is a godsend and a workhorse.
Meanwhile, I’m very happy with my basic single function laser jet.
Meanwhile, I’m very happy with my basic single function laser jet.
December 2, 2025 at 2:30 PM
For real. Our office ScanSnap is a godsend and a workhorse.
Meanwhile, I’m very happy with my basic single function laser jet.
Meanwhile, I’m very happy with my basic single function laser jet.
If that’s for *striking down* a statute, how does the rule interact with an as applied-only injunction? And do they have mandatory review? (Or, put differently, as a matter of political realism, why did the the high court grant review here without four votes?)
November 22, 2025 at 10:29 PM
If that’s for *striking down* a statute, how does the rule interact with an as applied-only injunction? And do they have mandatory review? (Or, put differently, as a matter of political realism, why did the the high court grant review here without four votes?)
Absolutely they are!
November 16, 2025 at 5:31 PM
Absolutely they are!
Yeah, exactly.
And then if they’re using it, when they send like, facts to help draft a complaint or what have you, we would have to worry it’s hallucinated.
And then if they’re using it, when they send like, facts to help draft a complaint or what have you, we would have to worry it’s hallucinated.
November 12, 2025 at 4:24 PM
Yeah, exactly.
And then if they’re using it, when they send like, facts to help draft a complaint or what have you, we would have to worry it’s hallucinated.
And then if they’re using it, when they send like, facts to help draft a complaint or what have you, we would have to worry it’s hallucinated.
If I recall, though, Clio has some guarantees of confidentiality.
November 12, 2025 at 3:52 PM
If I recall, though, Clio has some guarantees of confidentiality.
Well, it helps when they do it on stream… but I’m getting ahead of myself.
November 12, 2025 at 3:23 PM
Well, it helps when they do it on stream… but I’m getting ahead of myself.
We ask a lot of those hyper specific questions because we’ve had cases thrown out for those reasons, sadly.
And it’s not always obvious if a case falls into our practice area. But I hear the frustration loud and clear. When we can, we put together an introduction to someone in the right area.
And it’s not always obvious if a case falls into our practice area. But I hear the frustration loud and clear. When we can, we put together an introduction to someone in the right area.
November 12, 2025 at 3:21 PM
We ask a lot of those hyper specific questions because we’ve had cases thrown out for those reasons, sadly.
And it’s not always obvious if a case falls into our practice area. But I hear the frustration loud and clear. When we can, we put together an introduction to someone in the right area.
And it’s not always obvious if a case falls into our practice area. But I hear the frustration loud and clear. When we can, we put together an introduction to someone in the right area.
I think it depends in part on the TOS for your LLM.
November 12, 2025 at 3:19 PM
I think it depends in part on the TOS for your LLM.
I’ve sent those requests to adversaries! Don’t have a fully briefed motion to compel yet, but…
November 12, 2025 at 3:08 PM
I’ve sent those requests to adversaries! Don’t have a fully briefed motion to compel yet, but…
But I worry a bit that thinking that way privileges people who are educated on this, much the same way our standard biases privilege certain types of communication, etc.
November 12, 2025 at 3:05 PM
But I worry a bit that thinking that way privileges people who are educated on this, much the same way our standard biases privilege certain types of communication, etc.
Yeah, seems right—and kind to the cite checkers.
November 10, 2025 at 3:36 PM
Yeah, seems right—and kind to the cite checkers.
I think the basic problem is that cite-checkers at different schools are going to have completely different guidance from EICs, etc., and there’s no way to predict where their editors want them to land.
Maybe the best choice is to come up with a solution that’s easy to find/replace?
Maybe the best choice is to come up with a solution that’s easy to find/replace?
November 10, 2025 at 3:28 PM
I think the basic problem is that cite-checkers at different schools are going to have completely different guidance from EICs, etc., and there’s no way to predict where their editors want them to land.
Maybe the best choice is to come up with a solution that’s easy to find/replace?
Maybe the best choice is to come up with a solution that’s easy to find/replace?
Maybe it’s having gone to Chicago when the Maroonbook was still a going concern, but it seems to me you could do something like this on the first docket cite:
“other documents from this case will be cited as Toyota( I) ECF No. ___.”
(With the number if there are multiple cases by Toyota)
“other documents from this case will be cited as Toyota( I) ECF No. ___.”
(With the number if there are multiple cases by Toyota)
November 10, 2025 at 2:46 PM
Maybe it’s having gone to Chicago when the Maroonbook was still a going concern, but it seems to me you could do something like this on the first docket cite:
“other documents from this case will be cited as Toyota( I) ECF No. ___.”
(With the number if there are multiple cases by Toyota)
“other documents from this case will be cited as Toyota( I) ECF No. ___.”
(With the number if there are multiple cases by Toyota)