John Rentoul
@rentouljohn.bsky.social
18K followers 65 following 3.1K posts
Chief political commentator, The Independent, and visiting professor, the Strand Group, King's College London
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by John Rentoul
andyibbs.bsky.social
Poor guy, I hope his name didn’t give him an inferiority complex
Reposted by John Rentoul
tomfreeman.bsky.social
I finally realised what AI dependency reminds me of
A mock-up of an old D&D guide detailing the properties of magical items, featuring "Altman’s Quill of Artifice". The entry reads:
This enchanted quill, made from the feather of a harpy, serves as a magical scribe and sage, able to answer all its owner’s queries. The owner must use it to write a question at the top of a piece of paper or parchment, such as “Where is the secret entrance to the King’s treasury?” or “How can I cure lycanthropy?” Acting under its own power, it will write an answer. But despite its apparent (and often genuine) usefulness, this item is cursed.
Roll d20 to determine the result of any query: 1 Hopelessly wrong, 2-5 Contains major errors, 6-10 Contains minor errors, 11-16 Accurate but incomplete, 17-20 Fully accurate.
Apply modifiers in line with the rules for consulting sages (see Table 62) depending on the nature of the question (general 0, specific -2, exacting -4) and the availability of relevant knowledge (complete 0, partial -2, non-existent -6). The DM should choose the nature of any errors, as well as the consequences of believing them.
If the answer is less than fully accurate, that will not be obvious, as the quill of artifice writes in a confident and authoritative manner. A reader may scrutinise the answer to attempt to notice any problem, but to succeed they must pass an intelligence check at a penalty of -2. Anyone who has previously failed such a check makes all future checks at -4. The owner of the quill is particularly vulnerable, permanently losing one point of intelligence with each inaccurate answer that is believed. The owner will be unaware of this loss, and will become fiercely possessive of the quill, refusing to give it up and distrusting anyone who doubts its output.
A remove curse spell may make the owner willing to part with it, but the loss of intelligence is irreparable.
rentouljohn.bsky.social
“At 43, I am not saying ‘situationship’.” Janan Ganesh www.ft.com/content/0774...
rentouljohn.bsky.social
No, because that is not what I said
rentouljohn.bsky.social
What an extravagant and self-important way of saying you disagree – without any attempt at explanation
rentouljohn.bsky.social
And here is the painting by Albert Turpin, of the East London Group artuk.org/discover/art...
rentouljohn.bsky.social
St James the Less, Bethnal Green
rentouljohn.bsky.social
The PM will travel to Egypt tomorrow to attend the signing ceremony of the peace plan for Gaza, recalling this extract from Andrew Roberts on Churchill, which featured in the Commons Confidential newsletter last month
rentouljohn.bsky.social
My sister Sue has a show in south London next month
rentouljohn.bsky.social
Originally from Simon Ricketts, 10 years ago: “When they name roads in Novia Scotia five minutes before the bar is open” www.google.co.uk/maps/@44.738...
rentouljohn.bsky.social
Love this: "mediocre" is the only one US and UK agree on; US rates "average" above average
sundersays.bsky.social
How good (or bad) are good (or bad) words? @yougov.co.uk includes comparing how Americans and British people hear these words
yougov.co.uk/society/arti...
rentouljohn.bsky.social
I think the McSweeney strategy is the right one, because most marginal seats are Labour-Reform contests
rentouljohn.bsky.social
Blaming Farage and Brexit for tax rises is a sign of Starmer’s desperation www.independent.co.uk/voices/keir-...
Reposted by John Rentoul
Reposted by John Rentoul
rentouljohn.bsky.social
5/10 in John Clarke's Saturday Quiz in the i paper (answers in the paper or here later)