rgeci.bsky.social
@rgeci.bsky.social
broadly applicable way to estimate key safety metrics (Cmax and AUC) reasonably well. Big thanks to Zeynep Edizcan, Stephan Schaller, and Lars Kuepfer for the excellent collaboration that made this work possible.
November 17, 2025 at 1:48 PM
whether this is due to greater variability in the underlying PK data and clinical study protocols, or because dermal absorption is inherently more complex. Still, we conclude that despite the challenges in capturing absorption dynamics, the method offers a pragmatic and…
November 17, 2025 at 1:48 PM
One key aspect of the study is a systematic comparison of high-throughput PK prediction accuracy for dermal versus oral exposure. We found that dermal administration is more challenging to predict, though it’s unclear…
November 17, 2025 at 1:48 PM
the most reliable systemic PK predictions of 52 substances. With the best strategy, 75% of Cmax and 75% of AUC values fell within a tenfold range of observed human plasma data.
November 17, 2025 at 1:48 PM
be applied across pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and industrial chemicals. We ran 14,336 PBK simulations using the mechanistic skin permeation model of the Open Systems Pharmacology Suite to identify which combinations of LogP, solubility, and other parameters yield…
November 17, 2025 at 1:48 PM
In this work, we present a fully in silico HT-PBK workflow that predicts systemic exposure after dermal application using only QSAR-derived input parameters. It’s designed for early-stage use cases where no compound-specific in vitro or formulation data are available, and can…
November 17, 2025 at 1:48 PM
and provide a case study showing how mathematical models (#QSP) enable deeper understanding of in vivo biological effects.
Big thanks to Ahenk Zeynep Sayin, Lars Kuepfer, Stephan Schaller for the great teamwork and discussions that made this possible.
October 28, 2025 at 10:11 AM
And this in a way that is fully mechanistic and transparent. As if this was not enough, our analysis also gives new insights into why DILI often manifests in an “idiosyncratic” fashion. And on top of that, we also gain new insights into the in vivo relevance of #BSEP inhibition...
October 28, 2025 at 10:11 AM
But using high-throughput PBK modelling allows us to circumvent this problem and to generate such predictions from chemical structure alone. Thereby, we can show that already today available in vitro and in silico methods allow accurate predictions of DILI.
October 28, 2025 at 10:11 AM
…combining in vitro toxicity measurements and PK predicts DILI risks with up to 96% ROC AUC, all without animal testing. Traditionally, the prospective utility of this prediction approach would have been limited by the need for in vivo PK data from human studies.
October 28, 2025 at 10:11 AM
In this new study, we collected a huge dataset of 241 drugs with known clinical DILI outcomes, pharmacokinetic data, as well as in vitro hepatotoxicity data from 17 in vitro assays. This allowed us to show that…
October 28, 2025 at 10:11 AM
“Integration of In Vitro and In Silico Approaches Enables Prediction of Drug-Induced Liver Injury” is now available on #bioRxiv: doi.org/10.1101/2025...
Integration of In Vitro and In Silico Approaches Enables Prediction of Drug-Induced Liver Injury
Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a major cause of drug attrition and poses a significant threat to patient safety. However, current preclinical prediction methods, including heuristic screening rul...
doi.org
October 28, 2025 at 10:11 AM
🤝 Interested in applying PSA to your own chemical portfolio? Let’s connect and chat!
#OpenAccess #ExposureLed #NGRA #ChemicalSafety #NAMs #PBK #RiskAssessment #Toxicology #RegulatoryScience
June 30, 2025 at 2:27 PM
Huge thanks to my co-authors Andrew Worth, Alicia Paini, Lars Kuepfer and Stephan Schaller, and to everyone who debated these ideas at the NAM Designathon workshop in Ispra 🇮🇹. Your insights were invaluable!
June 30, 2025 at 2:27 PM
• However, most substances fall into a “medium PSA concern” band meaning bioactivity and external exposure still matter and it is not possible to (de)prioritise the majority of chemicals on their ADME alone.
June 30, 2025 at 2:27 PM
• A handful of false-positives, mainly borderline cases.
June 30, 2025 at 2:27 PM
𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀
• Zero false-negatives: high-concern chemicals were never missed.
June 30, 2025 at 2:27 PM
3. Reality check – Manual expert annotation and public-data review to see where the model shines (and where it doesn’t).
June 30, 2025 at 2:27 PM
𝗢𝘂𝗿 𝗔𝗽𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗮𝗰𝗵
1. Theory first – We spell out when it’s scientifically sound to rely purely on ADME.
2. High-throughput PBK modelling – Two PSA scoring systems (peak & time-average) applied to 139/150 Designathon compounds.
June 30, 2025 at 2:27 PM
...classify chemicals independently along TK and TD axes. Potential Systemic Availability (PSA) is our answer.
June 30, 2025 at 2:27 PM
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗲
Can we (de)prioritise chemicals in safety assessments using only their ADME/TK properties before we even look at bioactivity or external exposure? This is a core question in the move toward exposure-led risk assessment, highlighted by the EPAA NAM Designathon, which asked us to...
June 30, 2025 at 2:27 PM