RhonaE
@rhonae.bsky.social
Politically aware,environmenally passionate,ClimateChangeAction NOW.Dog/Animal devotee
….,and that is your reason?
Trump is NOT an idiot - he is many things which are repulsive, but, he is not an idiot! He is manipulatable I believe, he is being used by Extreme ‘RW republicans’ & such as Heritage F’ndtn to impose Project 2025 on USA - this hs bn ambition for decades.
Trump is NOT an idiot - he is many things which are repulsive, but, he is not an idiot! He is manipulatable I believe, he is being used by Extreme ‘RW republicans’ & such as Heritage F’ndtn to impose Project 2025 on USA - this hs bn ambition for decades.
December 31, 2025 at 10:37 PM
….,and that is your reason?
Trump is NOT an idiot - he is many things which are repulsive, but, he is not an idiot! He is manipulatable I believe, he is being used by Extreme ‘RW republicans’ & such as Heritage F’ndtn to impose Project 2025 on USA - this hs bn ambition for decades.
Trump is NOT an idiot - he is many things which are repulsive, but, he is not an idiot! He is manipulatable I believe, he is being used by Extreme ‘RW republicans’ & such as Heritage F’ndtn to impose Project 2025 on USA - this hs bn ambition for decades.
….and you would know …how?
December 30, 2025 at 8:15 PM
….and you would know …how?
2. People other than majority of Jews, are sickened, are traumatised by the images we see of the obliteration of ‘life’ OF any means of living, in GAZA. How people can not see this is offensive.
December 29, 2025 at 12:40 AM
2. People other than majority of Jews, are sickened, are traumatised by the images we see of the obliteration of ‘life’ OF any means of living, in GAZA. How people can not see this is offensive.
Why do you ask me? Anyway, does anyone now have any faith in the independence of the Judiciary in the United States? I would be really surprised if so.
December 28, 2025 at 11:46 PM
Why do you ask me? Anyway, does anyone now have any faith in the independence of the Judiciary in the United States? I would be really surprised if so.
Reposted by RhonaE
Correct. Reading even the redacted version, even not knowing the content of the redactions, its evident that some of those redactions are the name or names of perpetrators, not victims.
December 26, 2025 at 12:54 PM
Correct. Reading even the redacted version, even not knowing the content of the redactions, its evident that some of those redactions are the name or names of perpetrators, not victims.
Reposted by RhonaE
No matter what, those redactions are illegal. This was not redaction of a victim name.
December 26, 2025 at 1:54 AM
No matter what, those redactions are illegal. This was not redaction of a victim name.