@richclarke.bsky.social
@adapalmer.bsky.social Try asking Grok it it trained on your copyrighted material..
Its general answer: Yes, like every major large language model (OpenAI’s GPT series, Anthropic’s Claude, Meta’s Llama, Google’s Gemini, Mistral, etc.), I was trained on vast quantities of copyrighted material.
Its general answer: Yes, like every major large language model (OpenAI’s GPT series, Anthropic’s Claude, Meta’s Llama, Google’s Gemini, Mistral, etc.), I was trained on vast quantities of copyrighted material.
November 18, 2025 at 6:33 PM
@adapalmer.bsky.social Try asking Grok it it trained on your copyrighted material..
Its general answer: Yes, like every major large language model (OpenAI’s GPT series, Anthropic’s Claude, Meta’s Llama, Google’s Gemini, Mistral, etc.), I was trained on vast quantities of copyrighted material.
Its general answer: Yes, like every major large language model (OpenAI’s GPT series, Anthropic’s Claude, Meta’s Llama, Google’s Gemini, Mistral, etc.), I was trained on vast quantities of copyrighted material.
@harrylitman.bsky.social
If the SC holds that California's redistricting is unconstitutional because it privileges Latinos, would that mean that Republican gerrymanders are unconstitutional because they privilege white people? Wouldn't the same logic apply college admissions?
If the SC holds that California's redistricting is unconstitutional because it privileges Latinos, would that mean that Republican gerrymanders are unconstitutional because they privilege white people? Wouldn't the same logic apply college admissions?
November 14, 2025 at 10:15 PM
@harrylitman.bsky.social
If the SC holds that California's redistricting is unconstitutional because it privileges Latinos, would that mean that Republican gerrymanders are unconstitutional because they privilege white people? Wouldn't the same logic apply college admissions?
If the SC holds that California's redistricting is unconstitutional because it privileges Latinos, would that mean that Republican gerrymanders are unconstitutional because they privilege white people? Wouldn't the same logic apply college admissions?
@harrylitman.bsky.social
Reversing reverse discrimination: Is it possible, at least in theory, to come up with a legal doctrine that essentially says that any claim of discrimination must provide compelling evidence that the claimant is a member of a class that faces discrimination as a whole?
Reversing reverse discrimination: Is it possible, at least in theory, to come up with a legal doctrine that essentially says that any claim of discrimination must provide compelling evidence that the claimant is a member of a class that faces discrimination as a whole?
November 14, 2025 at 10:12 PM
@harrylitman.bsky.social
Reversing reverse discrimination: Is it possible, at least in theory, to come up with a legal doctrine that essentially says that any claim of discrimination must provide compelling evidence that the claimant is a member of a class that faces discrimination as a whole?
Reversing reverse discrimination: Is it possible, at least in theory, to come up with a legal doctrine that essentially says that any claim of discrimination must provide compelling evidence that the claimant is a member of a class that faces discrimination as a whole?