Rights Aotearoa
@rightsaotearoa.bsky.social
1K followers 1.5K following 120 posts
Rights Aotearoa is Aotearoa's leading NGO championing the universal human rights of all kiwis with a particular focus on the rights of transgender, non-binary, and intersex people. www.rightsaotearoa.nz Donation⏬ https://opencollective.com/rights-aotearoa
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
rightsaotearoa.bsky.social
Rights Aotearoa has written to Dr Rainbow, urging the HRC, under his leadership, to publicly call on the Government to adopt the recommendations of the Ia Tangata report, and to do so by reference to New Zealand’s binding international human rights obligations.

www.rightsaotearoa.nz/letter-to-th...
Letter to the Chief Human Rights Commissioner re Ia Tangata
I respectfully write to urge the Commission, under your leadership, to publicly call on the Government to adopt the recommendations of the Law Commission’s Ia Tangata report, and to do so by reference...
www.rightsaotearoa.nz
rightsaotearoa.bsky.social
Are you subscribed to our mailing list? Please sign up to get a weekly newsletter and occasional other dispatches from the front lines of the defence of human rights.

Sign up using the link in this week's newsletter 🔽🔽🔽

www.rightsaotearoa.nz/rights-aotea...
Rights Aotearoa Newsletter #3
It's Been a Week
www.rightsaotearoa.nz
Reposted by Rights Aotearoa
pault.bsky.social
Small favour: sign up for the Rights Aotearoa mailing list at

👉 www.rightsaotearoa.nz

It’ll be our main communications channel in the future (besides BSky): a weekly Thursday newsletter + the occasional urgent human rights hot take.

No spam, NO YELLING, just substance.
rightsaotearoa.bsky.social
We were on Ghost.io before it was made fashionable by Farrier ;-)

We just sent out our first Ghost-hosted newsletter, though just now.

Please read and then sign up! :-)

www.rightsaotearoa.nz/rights-aotea...
Rights Aotearoa Weekly Newsletter #1
Welcome to our very first newsletter hosted on Ghost.io
www.rightsaotearoa.nz
Reposted by Rights Aotearoa
rightsaotearoa.bsky.social
Rights Aotearoa has written to Dr Rainbow, urging the HRC, under his leadership, to publicly call on the Government to adopt the recommendations of the Ia Tangata report, and to do so by reference to New Zealand’s binding international human rights obligations.

www.rightsaotearoa.nz/letter-to-th...
Letter to the Chief Human Rights Commissioner re Ia Tangata
I respectfully write to urge the Commission, under your leadership, to publicly call on the Government to adopt the recommendations of the Law Commission’s Ia Tangata report, and to do so by reference...
www.rightsaotearoa.nz
rightsaotearoa.bsky.social
Rights Aotearoa welcomes Melissa Derby's support for extending hate speech protections to include religious groups and the LGBTQIA+ community, as expressed in her appearance on TVNZ's Q+A this morning.
She explicitly said that the LGB included the 'T'
RA will issue a formal press release tomorrow.
rightsaotearoa.bsky.social
"When someone argues that fewer trans people should exist, when they liken... healthcare to child abuse, when they advocate criminal penalties for doctors following...best practice —That is .... eliminationist rhetoric dressed up in the language of concern."
www.rightsaotearoa.nz/media-releas...
Media Release: Rights Aotearoa utterly condemns the Free Speech Union for bringing anti-transgender campaigner Helen Joyce to New Zealand
For immediate release 2 October 2025
www.rightsaotearoa.nz
rightsaotearoa.bsky.social
We just sent out our second newsletter. Please share and sign up - our focus right now is on building up our newsletter subscriber base organically.

www.rightsaotearoa.nz/rights-aotea...
Rights Aotearoa Newsletter #2
Let's build a community around universal human rights
www.rightsaotearoa.nz
Reposted by Rights Aotearoa
Reposted by Rights Aotearoa
pault.bsky.social
This is my response to their provisional opinion.
Letter letter letter letter
Reposted by Rights Aotearoa
pault.bsky.social
See below - a final decision from the Ombudsman that Brooke Van Velden can rely on professional legal privilege to redact the human rights analysis of the pay equity changes.

I gave it my all, team. Attached to the second post is my response to their provisional opinion.
Minister of Workplace Relations Request for human rights assessment of Equal Pay Amendment Bill
Thank you for your letter of 20 September in response to my provisional opinion.
I have now had an opportunity to consider your comments on the provisional opinion. However, having considered all the issues raised, I have now formed the final opinion that the Minister was entitled to withhold the information at issue under section 9(2)(h) of the Official Information Act 1982.
You have commented (among other things) that:
•
the public interest in the release of this information is ‘exceptional’ given:
-
the impact on many New Zealanders,
-
the engagement of fundamental non-discrimination rights
-
the expedited parliamentary process, which limited normal scrutiny
-
the ongoing ‘People’s Select Committee’ into pay equity matters
•
a summary of the information could be provided under section 16 of the OIA, with at the very least the conclusion of the advice being released
•
there is a ‘mandatory duty to sever non-privileged material’ under section 17 of the OIA. You have identified aspects that you consider would not be privileged material
•
the statutory immunity in section 48 of the OIA means that there would not be a ‘chilling effect’ from the release of this legal advice as the individuals would not have legal liability
•
the release of the Acting Attorney-General’s analysis of the rights impact of the Bill does not satisfy the public interest as this serves a different purpose to the human rights analysis in the Cabinet Paper.
I agree that there is a strong public interest in accountability of officials and transparency in the release of information relating to the human rights analysis of the Equal Pay Amendment Bill, outweighs the interest under section 9(2)(h). Successive Ombudsmen have considered that there is a very high interest in maintaining legal professional privilege generally, and I see that there is a heightened interest in this case given the circumstances around the Bill. Ultimately, I consider that the scrutiny of the legislation and government decision-making that you highlight can still occur with the text of the legislation and other information released, and individuals are still able to form their own legal opinions about the human rights impact of the legislation and to challenge decisions in court. While I see that there is a strong public interest, I do not consider it sufficient to outweigh the interest in maintaining legal privilege.
In relation to your submission that the information be released either as a summary or with redactions, I do not consider these are relevant considerations in these circumstances. Both options would involve revealing the details of the legal advice and therefore would waive privilege in the information. Legal privilege extends to all the information at issue and therefore parts cannot be separated out in a way that maintains legal privilege. This includes the conclusions that the advice reached.
As set out in my provisional opinion, there is no information to suggest privilege has been waived. This opinion has included consideration of public comments that have been made and information released on the topic.
I also do not see the section 48 immunity as relevant in this case as that is dealing with lability resulting from the release of information, however the interest in maintaining legal privilege is about the ability to seek and receive confidential legal advice without the possibility of release. These are very different matters.
I have now concluded my investigation.
rightsaotearoa.bsky.social
We were on Ghost.io before it was made fashionable by Farrier ;-)

We just sent out our first Ghost-hosted newsletter, though just now.

Please read and then sign up! :-)

www.rightsaotearoa.nz/rights-aotea...
Rights Aotearoa Weekly Newsletter #1
Welcome to our very first newsletter hosted on Ghost.io
www.rightsaotearoa.nz
Reposted by Rights Aotearoa
pault.bsky.social
Despite my industrial-strength ADHD, Rights Aotearoa will send out a newsletter each Thursday outlining our activities and key human rights news.

There will be the occasional extra email when important events require it, but we will not clog up your inbox!

Please sign up at www.rightsaotearoa.nz
rightsaotearoa.bsky.social
📢 Stay informed. Take action.

Sign up to the Rights Aotearoa newsletter for your weekly Thursday briefing — plus urgent alerts when human rights news breaks.

👉 Join here: www.rightsaotearoa.nz
Rights Aotearoa
Rights Aotearoa is NZ's leading NGO focused on promoting and defending the universal human rights of all Kiwis.
www.rightsaotearoa.nz
rightsaotearoa.bsky.social
Rights Aotearoa has written to Dr Rainbow, urging the HRC, under his leadership, to publicly call on the Government to adopt the recommendations of the Ia Tangata report, and to do so by reference to New Zealand’s binding international human rights obligations.

www.rightsaotearoa.nz/letter-to-th...
Letter to the Chief Human Rights Commissioner re Ia Tangata
I respectfully write to urge the Commission, under your leadership, to publicly call on the Government to adopt the recommendations of the Law Commission’s Ia Tangata report, and to do so by reference...
www.rightsaotearoa.nz
Reposted by Rights Aotearoa
pault.bsky.social
Please read my article below, which argues that we must retire the false marketplace of ideas analogy and replace it with a more coherent model.

*How can a good idea beat a bad idea when the owner of X alters the algorithm to win by brute force?*

constellation-of-rights.ghost.io/the-death-of...
screenshot of an X post from the  FSU "Good ideas beach bad ideas".
Reposted by Rights Aotearoa
rightsaotearoa.bsky.social
Democracy is not self-executing. It requires active protection. Yesterday, Doyle’s speech reminded us that we failed that test.
The right to participate in the political process without fear is a universal human right—and we will defend it with all our strength
www.rightsaotearoa.nz/yesterday-we...
Yesterday, We Became Less of a Democracy
Yesterday, when Benjamin Doyle was forced from Parliament by sustained death threats and harassment, Aotearoa failed a fundamental test of democratic resilience.
www.rightsaotearoa.nz
rightsaotearoa.bsky.social
Democracy is not self-executing. It requires active protection. Yesterday, Doyle’s speech reminded us that we failed that test.
The right to participate in the political process without fear is a universal human right—and we will defend it with all our strength
www.rightsaotearoa.nz/yesterday-we...
Yesterday, We Became Less of a Democracy
Yesterday, when Benjamin Doyle was forced from Parliament by sustained death threats and harassment, Aotearoa failed a fundamental test of democratic resilience.
www.rightsaotearoa.nz
rightsaotearoa.bsky.social
We’ve written to Minister Goldsmith, urging him to act on the Law Commission’s Ia Tangata report. The law must make the implicit explicit: clear protections for trans, non-binary & intersex people. Parliament must act—dignity can’t wait. #HumanRights #IaTangata

www.rightsaotearoa.nz/letter-to-pa...
Letter to Paul Goldsmith re the Law Commission's R150 - Ia Tangata.
Rights Aotearoa writes to you in response to correspondence you have received today from the Free Speech Union (FSU) NZ concerning the Law Commission’s recent report, Ia Tangata. Rights Aotearoa stron...
www.rightsaotearoa.nz
rightsaotearoa.bsky.social
We stand with the Lemkin Institute's call for GANHRI to withdraw the UK EHRC's accreditation. The EHRC has abandoned its mandate, systematically eroding trans & intersex rights. A captured institution cannot be a human rights body. #TransRights

www.lemkininstitute.com/_files/ugd/c...
Statement on the UK’s Equality and Human Rights Commission: Violation of the Paris Principles and erosion of protections for transgender and intersex people
Released on 5 September 2025
The Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention & Human Security calls on the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI) to withdraw accreditation from the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) in Great Britain due to violations of the Paris Principles and the erosion of protections for transgender and intersex people. The EHRC is Britain’s independent equality and human rights regulator. It currently has an “A status” accreditation as a National Human Rights Institution (NHRI), bestowed by GANHRI, which is co-funded by the United Nations and European Union. To maintain accreditation as an NHRI, an organisation needs to follow the Paris Principles. The Lemkin Institute believes that the EHRC has violated the Paris Principles, particularly in actions targeting the rights and protections for transgender and intersex people. The most recent example of such actions is the appointment of Dr. Mary-Ann Stephenson as the new EHRC Chair, contrary to the advice of the two committees involved in the appointment: the Women and Equalities and Joint Human Rights Committees.
While the EHRC is supposed to be a neutral and non-partisan public body, in the past few years it has behaved as a lobby group for erasing the rights of intersex and trans people on the basis of gender critical views. This has been explicitly confirmed by the leader of the UK’s Official Opposition, Kemi Badenoch, who posted on X (formerly Twitter): “having gender-critical men and women in the UK government, holding the positions that mattered most in Equalities and Health [...] It was when the ministers changed that everything changed.” One example of this takeover Badenoch shamelessly boasted about is the appointment of Baroness Falkner of Margravine under the Conservative Government headed by Liz Truss. In 2022, the EHRC wrote to the Scottish Government recommending a delay to the reform of the Gender Recognition Act—a reversal from its prior support for such reforms. This dramatic shift was not precipitated by the appearance of any new substantive evidence. It was quite partisan in nature. That same year, the EHRC issued a statement calling for a “more careful approach” to conversion therapy legislation that would specifically exclude transgender people from protections. Such an approach contradicted overwhelming evidence from both the British Medical Association and the Royal College of Psychiatrists and signalled a departure from Evidence Based Policy Making. Additionally, the EHRC published interim guidance encouraging single-sex service providers to exclude transgender people, significantly misrepresenting the legal thresholds of such exclusion as a ‘proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.’ It also intervened in the case For Women Scotland v. Scottish Ministers, arguing for a definition of sex that would exclude transgender people from their acquired legal sex as represented by their Gender Recognition Certificate. Rather than presenting a legal position, this argument is clearly based on an ideological stance on transgender people, which goes against the EHRC’s statutory obligation to equally protect all citizens. These actions did not go unnoticed; GANHRI’s reports on the EHRC acknowledged concerns by the civil society groups in the UK around human rights issues facing LGBTI people and migrants and asylum seekers in particular, recommending the EHRC address these issues in an ‘independent, effective, public and transparent manner.’
wrong in law or a breach of human rights. Translucent, a UK-based transgender advocacy organisation, has also begun legal action against the EHRC in light of this interim guidance.
This interim guidance has been challenged, but it has already caused irreversible damage. It has led to many organisations changing policies to exclude all transgender people from the gendered spaces of their lived gender and, in some cases, from the spaces of their sex assigned at birth as well. The guidance dictates that anyone who is not binarily “male” or “female” is excluded from single sex spaces, ranging from public toilets to groups such as a single-gender choir. Again, intersex people are left ignored; for example, it is not clear how guidance would apply to an intersex woman who was recorded initially as male at birth and had her birth certificate amended to female. When asked if intersex people had been considered in this guidance, Baroness Falkner responded that intersex people had not been considered as they are not included in the Equality Act (2010). Meanwhile, EHRC Commissioner Akua Reindorf KC stated in a personal capacity that trans people have been lied to about what rights they had and that there needed to be a period of correction, as other people also have rights. This goes against the EHRC’s own 2022 guidance that stated in Sch. 2, Paragraph 28: “If a service provider provides single or separate sex services for women and men, or provides services differently to women and men, they should treat transsexual people according to the gender in which they present.”
Though the harm this guidance has caused the transgender and intersex community in the United Kingdom cannot be understated, the EHRC’s ‘consultation’ on the guidance provided no opportunity to give feedback on this harm. The original consultation was scheduled for two weeks and, upon challenge, was extended to six weeks. However, it remained significantly shorter than the usual timeframe of 12 weeks The Lemkin Institute amplifies the voices of these organisations and calls on the GANHRI to urgently review the status of the EHRC as a human rights body, noting that GANHRI’s instruction of engagement with transgender groups to remain compliant with the Paris Principles has not only been explicitly disregarded but actively worked against, with the EHRC prioritising anti-transgender activist groups time and again, and more recently refusing Freedom of Information requests from individuals and groups concerned with transgender intersex rights.
We reiterate the words of our recent Red Flag Alert: there is a transparent attempt to eradicate transgender and intersex people from British life. This is a clear example of the 9th Pattern of Genocide: Denial and/or Prevention of Identity. The EHRC has undergone an institutional takeover and has been captured by transphobic and interphobic people and agendas. As of the 5th of September the finalised EHRC guidance has been given to the Government, there is no guarantee the guidance will be given time for debate in parliament before going into effect. If this is the case, the EHRC will have succeeded in undemocratically stripping transgender and intersex people in the United Kingdom of fundamental human rights and dignity.
The continued accreditation of EHRC as a human rights body, despite being a key player in this attempt of identity erasure, is a disgrace. GANHRI is allowing the EHRC to claim they are fully compliant with the Paris Principles whilst the voice of transgender and intersex people in Britain as well as other minority groups are left ignored. If GANHRI does not take action against the EHRC, it risks its credibility on the international stage and will be complicit in the genocide towards transgender and intersex people. The Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention & Human Security reaffirms a commitment to the rights of transgender and intersex people..