Rino Pescitelli
@rinopescitelli.bsky.social
97 followers 51 following 85 posts
(2) Full Professor in Organic Chemistry at University of Pisa. (1) Dad.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
rinopescitelli.bsky.social
Hold on, everyone! A new chiroptical spectroscopy has been discovered and nobody told me? link.springer.com/article/10.1... #Chemsky
rinopescitelli.bsky.social
my last attempt to restore a relationship with Elsevier @elsevierps.bsky.social I don't expect they will reply, though. #researchintegrity @pubpeer.com #chemsky 🧪
rinopescitelli.bsky.social
our paper rebutting claim that Raman can distinguish enantiomers is finally out onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/... Never accepted by Spectrochimica Acta A despite 2 positive reviews, withdrawn after 2 months... while the flawed paper is still on their website #chemsky #researchintegrity 🧪
May Two Enantiomers Have Different Raman Spectra?
May two enantiomers have different Raman spectra? Of course, no! despite what was claimed in a recent publication (Kopec et al., Spectrochim. Acta A 341 (2025):126423). In keeping with the theoretica...
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
rinopescitelli.bsky.social
second refused review for an Elsevier journal in two days #chemsky #researchintegrity 🧪and ongoing
rinopescitelli.bsky.social
keeping declining *any* invitation as referee, author, special issue editor from @elsevierps.bsky.social #researchintegrity #chemsky 🧪
rinopescitelli.bsky.social
fighting with ACS @pubs.acs.org and Italian CRUI about open access contract... do you know what a "primary author" is? is it legit that the CARE CRUI contract only applies to the "submitting corresponding author" and not to other corresponding authors? #chemsky 🧪
rinopescitelli.bsky.social
I still get messages from SSRN that our preprint is among the top downloads, while the paper has been withdrawn 😂 good job @elsevierconnect.bsky.social
rinopescitelli.bsky.social
while our commentary to the infamous paper is still stuck at the editor after 2 months with no reason, the preprint has become a top download :D papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.... #ChemSky #researchintegrity @pubpeer.com
rinopescitelli.bsky.social
didn't know that! I will surely look for this story
rinopescitelli.bsky.social
from what I learned from this experience, only a convinced editor can force a retraction. sorry, not only convinced, but also fair and ethical and transparent and many other things which don't apply here
rinopescitelli.bsky.social
that's funny, pubpeer finds my institutional mail has an invalid domain 😂
rinopescitelli.bsky.social
thanks for the suggestion. I will subscribe PubPeer and post the whole story there
rinopescitelli.bsky.social
3 months after publication the paper claiming that Raman can distinguish enantiomers is still there www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... while our commentary is stuck in the editorial offices of @elsevierconnect.bsky.social Such a transparency and fairness! #ChemSky #researchintegrity
rinopescitelli.bsky.social
or this one? "If an editor has convincing evidence that a retraction is required, they should not delay retraction simply
because the authors are not cooperative." @elsevierconnect.bsky.social 🧪#chemsky
rinopescitelli.bsky.social
... this one? "Publications should be retracted as soon as possible after the editor is convinced that the publication is
seriously flawed" @elsevierconnect.bsky.social #chemsky 🧪
doi.org
rinopescitelli.bsky.social
1- In our struggle to get our commentary (on the paper about enantiomer-discriminating Raman❗) published (45 days-and not yet), one editor from @elsevierconnect.bsky.social
recalled they "need to follow the COPE guidelines". doi.org/10.24318/cop... #chemsky 🧪 What about ...
doi.org
rinopescitelli.bsky.social
ins't it called carbon dioxide + water? :D
rinopescitelli.bsky.social
@gierschner.bsky.social perhaps you may be interested in this story too