@riparian2.bsky.social
big smile, here, no cringe
February 11, 2026 at 1:44 PM
big smile, here, no cringe
I'll remember this as the #1 contribution of the Biden years.
The rest was the easy stuff; and accomplishments that benefitted some don't make up for genocide of others. Can't afford him any "Yes, well, on balance ..."
The rest was the easy stuff; and accomplishments that benefitted some don't make up for genocide of others. Can't afford him any "Yes, well, on balance ..."
February 11, 2026 at 1:38 PM
I'll remember this as the #1 contribution of the Biden years.
The rest was the easy stuff; and accomplishments that benefitted some don't make up for genocide of others. Can't afford him any "Yes, well, on balance ..."
The rest was the easy stuff; and accomplishments that benefitted some don't make up for genocide of others. Can't afford him any "Yes, well, on balance ..."
Everyone but them is fair game - they believe they personally created their wealth when it was we the public, ie consumers, who created their wealth. We then pay our share of taxes, they do not.
February 11, 2026 at 1:13 PM
Everyone but them is fair game - they believe they personally created their wealth when it was we the public, ie consumers, who created their wealth. We then pay our share of taxes, they do not.
never in my life have I met a child resembling this
February 9, 2026 at 1:15 PM
never in my life have I met a child resembling this
Love to see your tentative little look up at the end, brave boy, knowing this was you learning something wonderful - that you can relax here!
February 8, 2026 at 1:01 AM
Love to see your tentative little look up at the end, brave boy, knowing this was you learning something wonderful - that you can relax here!
Headlines like this are infuriating. It's thanks to the Republican Party, for nominating, funding, supporting and obeying him and his handlers. They chose this.
February 7, 2026 at 4:55 PM
Headlines like this are infuriating. It's thanks to the Republican Party, for nominating, funding, supporting and obeying him and his handlers. They chose this.
Trump is getting way too much credit. The Republican Party did it.
February 7, 2026 at 4:52 PM
Trump is getting way too much credit. The Republican Party did it.
Going back to yr orig post, to which I was responding: Not reposting is not damaging; will not "prove" reality to ppl untethered to it, whatever their partic stake in supporting a supremacist society. We're already here, having elected MAGA gov't. Reposting this one post won't uncoil the frog.
February 6, 2026 at 3:27 PM
Going back to yr orig post, to which I was responding: Not reposting is not damaging; will not "prove" reality to ppl untethered to it, whatever their partic stake in supporting a supremacist society. We're already here, having elected MAGA gov't. Reposting this one post won't uncoil the frog.
Yep, so this handful of ppl are living in ignorance of reality and reposting this image will have zero impact on that. But I assume by liberal, you mean they don't/won't vote MAGA, so won't contribute to doom. Those contributing are unreachable.
February 6, 2026 at 3:16 PM
Yep, so this handful of ppl are living in ignorance of reality and reposting this image will have zero impact on that. But I assume by liberal, you mean they don't/won't vote MAGA, so won't contribute to doom. Those contributing are unreachable.
It's available to anyone already. Anyone who believes - or says without believing - it's a lie, cannot be reached by logic or facts, no matter whether it's posting a thousand times more.
February 6, 2026 at 3:06 PM
It's available to anyone already. Anyone who believes - or says without believing - it's a lie, cannot be reached by logic or facts, no matter whether it's posting a thousand times more.
I expect anyone who decides to believe it's a lie - or not believe it, but say it anyway - is capable of saying it's a lie whether they believe it or not, or whether they see it or not.
February 6, 2026 at 3:05 PM
I expect anyone who decides to believe it's a lie - or not believe it, but say it anyway - is capable of saying it's a lie whether they believe it or not, or whether they see it or not.
Yep, it's clear they've been restrained only by a POTUS.
As soon as that constraint was removed they've showed who
they are, not that they've changed.
As soon as that constraint was removed they've showed who
they are, not that they've changed.
February 6, 2026 at 3:01 PM
Yep, it's clear they've been restrained only by a POTUS.
As soon as that constraint was removed they've showed who
they are, not that they've changed.
As soon as that constraint was removed they've showed who
they are, not that they've changed.
Oh my goodness that dainty trot!
February 6, 2026 at 4:32 AM
Oh my goodness that dainty trot!
So is the journalist who sponsors this.
February 5, 2026 at 12:34 PM
So is the journalist who sponsors this.
Yep. A good chunk of the GOP electorate believes they'll be better off if U.S. assets are grotesquely plundered by the rich than if we give children lunch at school. Can't make it up.
February 5, 2026 at 2:39 AM
Yep. A good chunk of the GOP electorate believes they'll be better off if U.S. assets are grotesquely plundered by the rich than if we give children lunch at school. Can't make it up.
Yes; we know this. But that corporate profits are being sustained is on us. The American public needs to stop watching MSM television - for a start - and tell the stations why.
They're not profitable, as a given, b/c of what they produce; they're profitable only if we watch it.
They're not profitable, as a given, b/c of what they produce; they're profitable only if we watch it.
February 4, 2026 at 11:04 PM
Yes; we know this. But that corporate profits are being sustained is on us. The American public needs to stop watching MSM television - for a start - and tell the stations why.
They're not profitable, as a given, b/c of what they produce; they're profitable only if we watch it.
They're not profitable, as a given, b/c of what they produce; they're profitable only if we watch it.
Reposted
I promise I will stop banging on about this once Lisa Murkowski, Susan Collins, & co. cannot walk into the Capitol w/o being bombarded by media questions about why they are still violating their oaths & allowing the lawless authoritarianism to continue. 20 questions for them for every 1 for Dems.
February 4, 2026 at 4:38 AM
I promise I will stop banging on about this once Lisa Murkowski, Susan Collins, & co. cannot walk into the Capitol w/o being bombarded by media questions about why they are still violating their oaths & allowing the lawless authoritarianism to continue. 20 questions for them for every 1 for Dems.
And the measure of whether someone else who got something deserved it/earned it is whether the person doing this measuring did or didn't get it too.
February 4, 2026 at 10:57 PM
And the measure of whether someone else who got something deserved it/earned it is whether the person doing this measuring did or didn't get it too.
Sure, but Casten needed to accomplish more. His questioning will NOT be replayed nationwide, repeatedly. "That's not true. What you just said isn't true, is it. How can you do yr impt job when you're ignorant of basics?" If you don't pin them to the wall, you're talking into the void.
February 4, 2026 at 10:34 PM
Sure, but Casten needed to accomplish more. His questioning will NOT be replayed nationwide, repeatedly. "That's not true. What you just said isn't true, is it. How can you do yr impt job when you're ignorant of basics?" If you don't pin them to the wall, you're talking into the void.
👏 Well done, France. When oh when will American media decide to stop gaslighting the public into believing that morality and law = "politics."
February 4, 2026 at 3:05 AM
👏 Well done, France. When oh when will American media decide to stop gaslighting the public into believing that morality and law = "politics."
😑 absurd claim
February 3, 2026 at 2:15 PM
😑 absurd claim
Duh.
"Partying" was not and won't be the criminal charge brought.
"Partying" was not and won't be the criminal charge brought.
February 3, 2026 at 2:16 AM
Duh.
"Partying" was not and won't be the criminal charge brought.
"Partying" was not and won't be the criminal charge brought.
👍 adequate language
February 3, 2026 at 2:14 AM
👍 adequate language
"Aggressive" and "untrained" are weak substitutes for what's actually wrong with their mission and behaviors.
February 3, 2026 at 2:13 AM
"Aggressive" and "untrained" are weak substitutes for what's actually wrong with their mission and behaviors.