One Health only works when technical, behavioral, and institutional solutions come together
And remember the basics!
One Health only works when technical, behavioral, and institutional solutions come together
And remember the basics!
There is no single approach that will satisfy every stakeholder
Avoid the tragedy of the Commons, and the anticommons (so many stakeholders that nothing gets done)
There is no single approach that will satisfy every stakeholder
Avoid the tragedy of the Commons, and the anticommons (so many stakeholders that nothing gets done)
Communication is not the same as dissemination!
Communication is not the same as dissemination!
How do we make sure our science actually matters?
How do we justify our existence as researchers?
How do we make sure our science actually matters?
How do we justify our existence as researchers?
Aka, how dog is your dog?
Aka, how dog is your dog?
But regulation has a role - they used public support to pass legislation
But regulation has a role - they used public support to pass legislation
The concept of dog breeds is a product of wealth - we can afford to have dogs without jobs
The concept of dog breeds is a product of wealth - we can afford to have dogs without jobs
Antimicrobial susceptibility should be considered a common pool resource
Garrett Hardin: the problem has no technical solution, it requires an extension of morality
Antimicrobial susceptibility should be considered a common pool resource
Garrett Hardin: the problem has no technical solution, it requires an extension of morality
Science can provide data, but it can only be translated into policy in the context of societal norms
We can deal with that through scientific ethics - beneficence, respect, justice
Science can provide data, but it can only be translated into policy in the context of societal norms
We can deal with that through scientific ethics - beneficence, respect, justice
Could health policies and practices become detached from science?
Could the data be wrong? Or, can the data speak for themselves, or do they require interpretation?
Could health policies and practices become detached from science?
Could the data be wrong? Or, can the data speak for themselves, or do they require interpretation?
Where does our research sit on the quadrant of curiosity- vs need-driven and proactive vs reactive?
Where does our research sit on the quadrant of curiosity- vs need-driven and proactive vs reactive?
If 124 genomes, 12 HPAI, including 2 novel reassortments. No critical mammalian adaptations
If 124 genomes, 12 HPAI, including 2 novel reassortments. No critical mammalian adaptations
Right-skewed distribution of ARG counts. Most common were what you'd expect (ie, blaOXA in 17% of samples)
Right-skewed distribution of ARG counts. Most common were what you'd expect (ie, blaOXA in 17% of samples)
No active infection, but evidence of exposure in marsh habitats during fall migration
No active infection, but evidence of exposure in marsh habitats during fall migration
Low prevalence, but persists once it starts, and it's probably introduced in transport
Low prevalence, but persists once it starts, and it's probably introduced in transport
Lots of swine-fed mosquitoes in and around swine farms!
Lots of swine-fed mosquitoes in and around swine farms!
Not much transitivity, but fast movement of ASF
Not much transitivity, but fast movement of ASF
Single capture probes did enrich, but not by much. Double capture much better. Both better than culture
Single capture probes did enrich, but not by much. Double capture much better. Both better than culture