@robertstadler.bsky.social
240 followers 33 following 540 posts
Wrong, but not contumacious. He/ him
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
De facto immunity just via "We've decided not to prosecute ourselves" should not be a thing.
If we ever get to the point as a country where we're seriously trying to recover from the damage Trump is doing, one of the reforms we'll need is an independent agency which can bring corruption cases against members of the executive branch.
If I'm a judge holding a hearing on a Sunday evening, I'm starting out pretty mad already. The DOJ did not convince her that her anger was misplaced.
As Terry Pratchett tells us, sin is when you treat people as things. It's not when you treat things as things.
Building a strong economy is not their goal.
The general public has a poor understanding of the law in general. The way legal cases are reported in mass media doesn't help.
Still not as crazy as his posting AI slop of himself announcing US government support for medbeds.
Spiders Yglesias, who lives in cave & believes in over 10000 centrist policies is an outlier adn should not have been counted.
How often do courts reject unopposed scheduling requests?
My understanding is that Mohammed went through a similar process.

Your reforms may be fine and good, but we're not converting anyway.
Although the "brief" part seems to be optional.
I don't live in NYC, so I won't be voting in that election .

For a party leader, "vote blue no matter who" is less a rule of thumb and more their job description. If you can't support your party's nominees (absent something much worse than these policy differences), you can't be the party's leader.
It doesn't apply to local elections, where policies often don't fall into a left-right axis, and where I want competence more than endorsement of my policy preferences by people who don't have much influence over those policies. Mamdani's beliefs on Israel-Palestine have limited real-world effect.
For me, "vote blue no matter who" applies mostly to federal elections, where control of each chamber of Congress matters more than policy disagreements. It applies somewhat to state elections, for the same reason.
"LLM" stands for "Large Language Model," which is a type of machine learning system. The various chatbots we've seen these last few years (e.g. ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude) are all LLMs.
"AI" is a very general term, so actual technical folks tend not to use it (we need to be clear about what we actually mean).

"Machine learning" or, more properly, "statistical machine learning" refers to a way to "train" systems by giving them lots of examples to imitate.
Except that none of us have any expectation that the current Democratic leadership will actually pursue _any_ policy solution, let alone my preferred one.
Denethor was a wise, competent leader who gave in to despair and fell into madness.
I've always thought that this isn't actually true, though. Fearing people who look/sound/act unfamiliar is pretty natural. This is one of the reasons why xenophobia is common across a broad range of cultures both ancient and modern.

It's not right, but it is natural.
Congress has a lot of tools available for dealing with SCOTUS. But the Republican majority is complicit, so that's not happening anytime soon.
I've been trying to think about what various Democratic-aligned groups could do here. Maybe Governor Kotek could have state-controlled law enforcement groups shadow federal units to monitor and deter abuses?
It's based solely on the caption of the case, not its contents.
In general, you can't sue the federal government unless explicitly permitted to do so. Congress has passed some laws allowing people to sue, but we're still limited to what they've allowed.
It's been very frustrating seeing how the absence of strategy has crippled 21st century liberal movements. But I guess it's no more fair to blame our current leaders for lacking King's brilliance than to blame Napoleon III for lacking his namesake's operational skill.