Which part?

And journalists/commentators hate it when they're not engaging in persuasion or revelation. For them the act of writing becomes boring and for a lot of readers it's boring too. (Which isn't to say it shouldn't be done. Brushing teeth is boring. Keeping the rage burning should be equivalent.)

Hot take: I don't think she's quite wrong, she just misdiagnoses the issue. What makes writing about Trump boring isn't his lack of moral backbone (that's his shtick.) It's that a third of the media's audience has no empathy which means there's no persuasion in exposure. Just preaching to the choir.

Not La Poste? Traitre.

I remember seeing studies that showed wild inaccuracies for some models.

Be careful. Last time we had a dispute over works and inherent grace we got a Thirty Years War.

@jonbois.bsky.social

Question: In what world is transparency greater with private in stead of public actors? Profit motives are absolute anti-transparency and compound at every level. If you're right on a structural level then shifting to a m4a model is absolutely better as a baseline than a for-profit model.

You don't like media where a cop learns to shoot people again? Weird.

Do these idiots not realize that Trump is the autoimmune reaction to Neoconservative ideology??

Odd way to talk about @michaelhobbes.bsky.social and @notalawyer.bsky.social, but okay I guess.