Very interesting! It seems different manufacturers use different encodings: this is from www.smartrise.us/wp-content/u...

Website looks fine from here…

I can't remember who suggested this, but it rings true: it's the sort of feature that's only useful if you are e.g. a senior executive at Apple, who gets more messages that they can easily keep on top of. But for most of us it doesn't solve a problem that we have

Unless you're in one of the places where the firework display has been cancelled because of weather warnings, of course. Sorry Bangor, but you can still enjoy the above banger.

I'm follow some pretty questionable people, so I'm wondering if that's me, but I missed the drama & I don't know who you're referring to

I think the answer is that I was not wrong about rainbows, and the reason I was not is thanks to John Conway: I had previously watched chapter 13 of www.simonsfoundation.org/2014/04/04/j...

absolutely two of my favourite songs, though I can't really dispute that they're annoying

does she know scampi?

I have given it a thorough clean, and all is well

It appears to be this chap, which I wasn't expecting.

The problem I'm debugging is that it has become impermeable to water. By systematically exchanging components with the other portafilter (as I have just found out this part is called), I have identified the culprit, and I am surprised.

But of course different fields of science have different conventions governing how authors should be listed.

You will notice that in the middle there is a chunk of author names in alphabetical order: there the order of names is not intended to convey information about the relative importance of that author's contribution.