....Have NVIDIA sent you some free goodies lately?

Please don't reboot the blockchain hype 😭

Home office today then? 😂

Let's all stop pretending that pommes and gyros are anything other than a vessel to spoon delicious garlic mayo into our faces.

I would seriously like a certificate or social media badge for the number of Elsevier/Frontiers/MDPI/Hindawi/etc reviews I declined

It's part of the implicit selection criteria. The system has rewarded overconfident cheating scumbags for decades.

I've said it many times before: treat people like rockstars and they'll start behaving like rockstars.

Also, the chance that the balance is exactly 0.00 is just statistically improbable, and therefore very likely to be wrong. I think the rule "don't display incorrect values" is even more important here.

(Either that or display "Haha skint")

"So anyway, completely in accordance with the null hypothesis we turned out to be right all along."

When you click "no response" someone earning minimum wage in a drab strip mall office will go "AHA!" and continue to spam you.

Ok, wow! Didn't realise they were doing a documentary instead of comedy

RIP waistline 🥲

As a massive M&W fan: I haven't seen it yet. Should I? Is it numberwang?

Future research directions:
Just, literally anything.

TL;DR, from a privacy perspective; I wonder how much of the consent that RELX relies on for its data processing is actually freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous.

Another example, they collected my banking details because my (then) university made us pay upfront for conference visits. Reference manager? Sorry bud, IT only supports Mendeley on your uni provided computer. Oh and don't forget to update your Pure profile...

Pondering this a few years after the fact the thing that bugs me most is that academics have *no choice* but to use these products. E.g. because your employer forces you to use platform X, for which you need a phone for 2FA SMS. No work phone? You're SOL, they now have your private number.