@robotymcbotface.bsky.social
They shouldn’t form the basis of anyone’s policy .
December 31, 2025 at 12:39 PM
They shouldn’t form the basis of anyone’s policy .
I’m curious how you know this.
December 30, 2025 at 7:54 AM
I’m curious how you know this.
A very complicated subject but in a nutshell: No solid evidence Trump lifted U.S. sanctions on companies selling weapons to Russia. Some minor sanctions changes affected firms with indirect ties, but Russia’s arms industry remains heavily sanctioned, and the U.S. has not sold weapons to Russia.
December 29, 2025 at 6:12 AM
A very complicated subject but in a nutshell: No solid evidence Trump lifted U.S. sanctions on companies selling weapons to Russia. Some minor sanctions changes affected firms with indirect ties, but Russia’s arms industry remains heavily sanctioned, and the U.S. has not sold weapons to Russia.
Trump v. United States, the Court held that a president has absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for acts that fall within his “core constitutional powers,” like issuing pardons — and that this immunity cannot be pierced simply because the president acted with corrupt intent. FFS!
December 28, 2025 at 7:31 AM
Trump v. United States, the Court held that a president has absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for acts that fall within his “core constitutional powers,” like issuing pardons — and that this immunity cannot be pierced simply because the president acted with corrupt intent. FFS!
“The press serves the governed, not the governors.”
— Hugo Black
— Hugo Black
December 27, 2025 at 2:59 AM
“The press serves the governed, not the governors.”
— Hugo Black
— Hugo Black
To not hold our elected representatives accountable, regardless of the election cycle is exactly what the founding fathers feared. We must always hold our reps accountable, country over party, no exceptions.
December 27, 2025 at 2:51 AM
To not hold our elected representatives accountable, regardless of the election cycle is exactly what the founding fathers feared. We must always hold our reps accountable, country over party, no exceptions.
Article II, Section 2: the president may grant pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment. Self pardoning is undefined and untested, if he pardoned himself, it would likely go before the Supreme Court, and since it’s not explicitly defined would not interfere.
December 26, 2025 at 9:43 PM
Article II, Section 2: the president may grant pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment. Self pardoning is undefined and untested, if he pardoned himself, it would likely go before the Supreme Court, and since it’s not explicitly defined would not interfere.
The constitution literally defines separation of powers as a system designed to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful and to protect individual liberty by ensuring that each branch can limit, or check, the powers of the others. Exactly what the current admin does not want.
December 26, 2025 at 3:47 PM
The constitution literally defines separation of powers as a system designed to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful and to protect individual liberty by ensuring that each branch can limit, or check, the powers of the others. Exactly what the current admin does not want.
Create a private equity firm that only buys private equity firms🤔
December 25, 2025 at 2:48 PM
Create a private equity firm that only buys private equity firms🤔
Trump almost always talks about himself in the first person, it seems out of place for him to refer to himself in the third person…narcissistic personality traits ??
December 24, 2025 at 8:59 PM
Trump almost always talks about himself in the first person, it seems out of place for him to refer to himself in the third person…narcissistic personality traits ??
Not guilty until proven guilty by a jury of his peers…one may not like it, but the rule of law is what Trump does not respect, we are better than that…I truly hope.
December 24, 2025 at 4:02 PM
Not guilty until proven guilty by a jury of his peers…one may not like it, but the rule of law is what Trump does not respect, we are better than that…I truly hope.
Chew on this, typically, the FBI (or any forensic document examiners) can make an initial determination in days to a few weeks, but a full, defensible conclusion often takes longer. The FBI can now make an accurate assessment in hours.🤔
December 24, 2025 at 3:20 AM
Chew on this, typically, the FBI (or any forensic document examiners) can make an initial determination in days to a few weeks, but a full, defensible conclusion often takes longer. The FBI can now make an accurate assessment in hours.🤔
If the DOJ breaks the law, it can be checked by courts, Congress, inspectors general, professional discipline, the president, whistleblowers, the press, and ultimately voters. Accountability can be slow or imperfect, but no agency is legally above the law.
December 24, 2025 at 3:08 AM
If the DOJ breaks the law, it can be checked by courts, Congress, inspectors general, professional discipline, the president, whistleblowers, the press, and ultimately voters. Accountability can be slow or imperfect, but no agency is legally above the law.
Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi has a doppelgänger… who knew?
December 22, 2025 at 8:31 PM
Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi has a doppelgänger… who knew?
“In God We Trust” first appeared on U.S. coins in 1864 during the Civil War.
It was adopted as the official national motto in 1956, and began appearing on paper currency in 1957. The terms intent was was meant to signal moral confidence and unity, not to establish a specific religion.
It was adopted as the official national motto in 1956, and began appearing on paper currency in 1957. The terms intent was was meant to signal moral confidence and unity, not to establish a specific religion.
December 22, 2025 at 8:28 PM
“In God We Trust” first appeared on U.S. coins in 1864 during the Civil War.
It was adopted as the official national motto in 1956, and began appearing on paper currency in 1957. The terms intent was was meant to signal moral confidence and unity, not to establish a specific religion.
It was adopted as the official national motto in 1956, and began appearing on paper currency in 1957. The terms intent was was meant to signal moral confidence and unity, not to establish a specific religion.
The U.S. was not founded as an officially Christian nation. The Constitution is secular and protects religious freedom, but many founders were influenced by Christian ideas, which shaped early culture without making Christianity the state religion.
December 22, 2025 at 8:24 PM
The U.S. was not founded as an officially Christian nation. The Constitution is secular and protects religious freedom, but many founders were influenced by Christian ideas, which shaped early culture without making Christianity the state religion.
Now removing his name from any government title building name etc should be day1 job 1 for the new president.
December 22, 2025 at 3:25 PM
Now removing his name from any government title building name etc should be day1 job 1 for the new president.
To erase him from history would be a grave error. It is essential that we keep his memory at the forefront of our collective consciousness, for only by doing so can we as a nation avoid repeating the mistakes of the past.
December 22, 2025 at 3:23 PM
To erase him from history would be a grave error. It is essential that we keep his memory at the forefront of our collective consciousness, for only by doing so can we as a nation avoid repeating the mistakes of the past.
The ear bandage thing was exceptionally weird.
December 17, 2025 at 10:50 PM
The ear bandage thing was exceptionally weird.
Cringe tv, not interested.
December 17, 2025 at 10:48 PM
Cringe tv, not interested.
The U.S. lacks single-payer healthcare because entrenched economic interests dominate a political system designed to block major change, while the existing employer-based system reduces urgency among the insured. Those against are organized, those for are not.
December 16, 2025 at 8:16 AM
The U.S. lacks single-payer healthcare because entrenched economic interests dominate a political system designed to block major change, while the existing employer-based system reduces urgency among the insured. Those against are organized, those for are not.
Is he lying if nobody is listening?
December 16, 2025 at 8:07 AM
Is he lying if nobody is listening?
Unfortunately many see him as a genie and not a representative.
December 15, 2025 at 10:16 PM
Unfortunately many see him as a genie and not a representative.
The $18T tariff claim is incorrect. Actual U.S. tariff revenue (“customs duties”) is reported by Treasury and totals tens–hundreds of billions per year, not trillions. The figure likely comes from wrongly applying tariff rates to total imports instead of actual collections.
December 15, 2025 at 6:37 AM
The $18T tariff claim is incorrect. Actual U.S. tariff revenue (“customs duties”) is reported by Treasury and totals tens–hundreds of billions per year, not trillions. The figure likely comes from wrongly applying tariff rates to total imports instead of actual collections.