Writer ✍🏼 Photographer 📷
Gamer 🎮 Amateur Astronomer 🔭
I’ll answer that for you: Yes, you are.
What was posted doesn’t illuminate anyone on whatever “vile ideas” he has. So, asking for a summary isn’t out of the question.
“Sheesh! Some guys!” is right. 🙄
I’ll answer that for you: Yes, you are.
What was posted doesn’t illuminate anyone on whatever “vile ideas” he has. So, asking for a summary isn’t out of the question.
“Sheesh! Some guys!” is right. 🙄
I’m also just looking to understand what people mean when they say that studying Paganism can lead to this kind of thinking.
I’m also just looking to understand what people mean when they say that studying Paganism can lead to this kind of thinking.
And you’re worse. Fuck off.
And you’re worse. Fuck off.
While the first sentence is correct as is, my point still stands in my previous comment. Removing "without her man", it would still be a complete sentence. Using the commas forms an interjection clause and adds emphasis. Acting like the commas are incorrect
While the first sentence is correct as is, my point still stands in my previous comment. Removing "without her man", it would still be a complete sentence. Using the commas forms an interjection clause and adds emphasis. Acting like the commas are incorrect
If the sentence were “A woman is nothing,” it would be complete sentence. The clause “without her man” clarifies the writer’s belief that a woman’s worth only derives from the man, or men, in her life. It is unnecessary to
If the sentence were “A woman is nothing,” it would be complete sentence. The clause “without her man” clarifies the writer’s belief that a woman’s worth only derives from the man, or men, in her life. It is unnecessary to