rogueepoch.bsky.social
@rogueepoch.bsky.social
Historian 📜 (Former) Soldier 🪖
Writer ✍🏼 Photographer 📷
Gamer 🎮 Amateur Astronomer 🔭
Are you retarded?

I’ll answer that for you: Yes, you are.

What was posted doesn’t illuminate anyone on whatever “vile ideas” he has. So, asking for a summary isn’t out of the question.

“Sheesh! Some guys!” is right. 🙄
December 29, 2024 at 10:25 PM
I’m not going to do a deep dive on some random pagan because another random internet person mentioned them and vaguely alluded to some oppressive ideas the pagan may have. All anyone has said here is that he’s pagan and links paganism to the history of the English and he has “bad ideas”.
December 29, 2024 at 9:13 PM
What vile ideas? That was the question I asked, which wasn’t even addressed.
December 29, 2024 at 9:11 PM
Can someone explain to me the “far-right leanings” alluded to? I skimmed the linked article, so I admittedly didn’t read it in-depth.

I’m also just looking to understand what people mean when they say that studying Paganism can lead to this kind of thinking.
December 29, 2024 at 8:45 PM
What are the sides?
December 25, 2024 at 2:06 PM
What’s stopping you? We’re all waiting.
November 26, 2024 at 2:04 AM
What are we blocking and reorienting now?
November 25, 2024 at 9:22 PM
I’ll concede that *maybe* I could have included “please” to make it more polite. Firm, but polite. But at least I wasn’t insulting him by insisting on an explanation. Others in here are acting like I ridiculed the guy.
November 25, 2024 at 6:51 PM
Nah. Not correctly. Just bitching about my tone and one guy pretending he had “credentials”.
November 25, 2024 at 5:54 PM
You didn’t chastise me, you cried and I ignored you. You’re right, he’s not a computer. He’s an ignorant, illiterate schmuck who doesn’t understand the language he speaks.

And you’re worse. Fuck off.
November 25, 2024 at 2:51 PM
No, I don’t think I will.
November 25, 2024 at 3:30 AM
I think you have the roles here backward. Go back to your imaginary credentials and pretending to be special.
November 24, 2024 at 11:34 PM
MAKES YOU WRONG!
November 24, 2024 at 11:29 PM
Sure they are, kiddo. Sure they are. 😂😂😂

While the first sentence is correct as is, my point still stands in my previous comment. Removing "without her man", it would still be a complete sentence. Using the commas forms an interjection clause and adds emphasis. Acting like the commas are incorrect
November 24, 2024 at 11:29 PM
Textbook projection, pal. Nothing about my post indicates I'm mad. I just gave you an English lesson, is all. 🙄
November 24, 2024 at 11:19 PM
understanding the writer’s position that women have no intrinsic value. Therefore, the commas before and after it are necessary. It is called an interjection clause. Look it up and get back to me.
November 24, 2024 at 10:59 PM
I’m going to assume you failed English grammar class, or barely scraped by.

If the sentence were “A woman is nothing,” it would be complete sentence. The clause “without her man” clarifies the writer’s belief that a woman’s worth only derives from the man, or men, in her life. It is unnecessary to
November 24, 2024 at 10:59 PM
I can see what you mean. But I guess that was my point.
November 24, 2024 at 9:24 PM
Explain.
November 24, 2024 at 9:18 PM
Doesn’t matter. You love doing it and it brings you joy. That’s all that matters.
November 24, 2024 at 9:13 PM
I’m all for promoting diversity, but it isn’t weird to anyone else that the category for “Jews”, a Middle Eastern ethnicity (and religion, but let’s focus on ethnic Jews for now), is clustered under “white/Caucasian”?
November 24, 2024 at 9:10 PM
I mean, it makes sense. 🤷🏻‍♂️
November 24, 2024 at 4:08 AM