@rolar63.bsky.social
Was für eine Schreckensbilanz! Man konnte es kommen sehen, aber was kommt noch?
Wie immer exzellent aufgeschrieben. Alles Gute im Ruhestand!
Wie immer exzellent aufgeschrieben. Alles Gute im Ruhestand!
January 19, 2026 at 10:02 PM
Was für eine Schreckensbilanz! Man konnte es kommen sehen, aber was kommt noch?
Wie immer exzellent aufgeschrieben. Alles Gute im Ruhestand!
Wie immer exzellent aufgeschrieben. Alles Gute im Ruhestand!
Reposted
So when authorities say “she tried to run over an officer,” that is not a neutral description. It is a claim of intent that can be used to justify lethal force after the fact.
When the state kills first and invents the threat afterward, it is not policing, it is death squad behavior. /end
When the state kills first and invents the threat afterward, it is not policing, it is death squad behavior. /end
January 8, 2026 at 9:13 PM
So when authorities say “she tried to run over an officer,” that is not a neutral description. It is a claim of intent that can be used to justify lethal force after the fact.
When the state kills first and invents the threat afterward, it is not policing, it is death squad behavior. /end
When the state kills first and invents the threat afterward, it is not policing, it is death squad behavior. /end
Trump dialectics:
1. „Epstein is a hoax“.
2. „Investigate Dems“.
1. „Epstein is a hoax“.
2. „Investigate Dems“.
November 15, 2025 at 9:12 AM
Trump dialectics:
1. „Epstein is a hoax“.
2. „Investigate Dems“.
1. „Epstein is a hoax“.
2. „Investigate Dems“.