Rosen
banner
rosenkranz05.bsky.social
Rosen
@rosenkranz05.bsky.social
Kansas: 64% support abortion 'legal in all or most cases'.
prri.org/research/abo...
December 18, 2025 at 7:12 PM
There are no moderate republicans anymore.
December 18, 2025 at 5:37 PM
Vivaldi Four Seasons: complete, original version.
Voices of Music, Freivogel, Moore, Youssefian. 4K
youtu.be/aryDMAP6oug?...
December 18, 2025 at 5:15 PM
Gosh... Completely out of step with the zeitgeist.
No, except on formal occasions.
Can you imagine this Ossoff (my 2028 ideal nominee) in a suit and tie during a podcast or a rally? To make him look like a conformist establishment shill?

youtube.com/shorts/imWYs...
December 18, 2025 at 5:12 PM
December 17, 2025 at 7:22 PM
December 16, 2025 at 8:17 PM
43-44 states out of 50 states are pro-abortion. And those few with anti-abortion majorities are deep-red and unwinnable anyway. The Senate seats now targeted are all vastly pro-abortion.
Ohio: 64%
Iowa: 59%
Texas: 56%
Alaska: 69%.
See this important survey:
prri.org/research/abo...
December 16, 2025 at 7:55 PM
That same survey shows that with an anti-abortion candidate, more votes would be lost than gained.
It should be obvious that Pro-lifers are usually right-wing religious extremists: they will not vote for an anti-abortion D over an anti-abortion R.
December 16, 2025 at 7:40 PM
No state has a pro-life majority. Only 6 states have a majority for 'abortion illegal in most cases': they are all deep-red and unwinnable anyway. The 4 Senate seats targeted by Dem strategists are all vastly pro-abortion.
Ohio: 64%
Iowa: 59%
Texas: 56%
Alaska: 69%.
See: prri.org/research/abo...
December 16, 2025 at 7:40 PM
Anyway, the current system is abysmal. It costs 2.5 times the OECD average (with a worse outcome): the difference goes into undue private profits. Any 2028 DEM nominee should run on a solution different from insurance subsidies.
December 15, 2025 at 8:43 PM
1st reason: conviction. He always tried to achieve universal coverage in CA as far as possible. And repeated it recently. See: x.com/ezraklein/st...
2nd: it's popular, as your quote shows.
3rd: his chances for the nomination depend on support from the left grassroots. Centrists will support Shapiro.
December 15, 2025 at 12:35 AM
Here you are conceding too much. Our societies are based on a generic unisex subject of rights. There is no general right to sexualise restrooms either... While muscle in sports makes a key difference, there is no reason to accept that trans people are dangerous.
December 14, 2025 at 10:51 PM
Yes, the algorithm is the problem: we should be entitled to block it. Beyond that, it's the old regressive right in new clothes. See Haidt at the Heritage Foundation.

See: Moral panic about technology is being used as a Trojan horse for social conservatism.
www.hdavidsessions.com/p/why-tech-m...
December 8, 2025 at 9:22 PM
'The Christmas tree started the fight'
December 3, 2025 at 5:46 PM
The pro-life candidate thing is total nonsense in data: only 5 unwinnable deep-red states have a pro-life majority now. I can't even understand why he keeps talking about it. It damages his whole idea of local differentiation without any gain.
prri.org/research/abo...
November 3, 2025 at 11:28 AM