Rouble Destroying Fella 🇺🇦
@roubledestroyer.bsky.social
Enthusiastic supporter of 🇺🇦, NATO, and close ties between all 🇪🇺 nations. REDACTED expansion is non-negotiable.
Proudly 🇬🇧. Shamefully 🇺🇸.
Слава Україні
Proudly 🇬🇧. Shamefully 🇺🇸.
Слава Україні
That’s the neat part…
They won’t and we’ll have to end their cushy careers.
They won’t and we’ll have to end their cushy careers.
November 10, 2025 at 10:46 PM
That’s the neat part…
They won’t and we’ll have to end their cushy careers.
They won’t and we’ll have to end their cushy careers.
We need leaders that care more about the people than their own party.
Tough luck, though… no party in 🇺🇸 cares about the people.
Tough luck, though… no party in 🇺🇸 cares about the people.
November 10, 2025 at 6:34 PM
We need leaders that care more about the people than their own party.
Tough luck, though… no party in 🇺🇸 cares about the people.
Tough luck, though… no party in 🇺🇸 cares about the people.
That doesn’t mean they won’t or shouldn’t get it, but they don’t deserve it at all.
November 10, 2025 at 6:32 PM
That doesn’t mean they won’t or shouldn’t get it, but they don’t deserve it at all.
So our courageous Dems want to make sure that the corporate overlords stay happy during the holiday season in order to have another protracted shutdown that only hurts federal workers.
Sticking to their guns would have almost certainly resulted in the least amount of pain to working-class people.
Sticking to their guns would have almost certainly resulted in the least amount of pain to working-class people.
November 10, 2025 at 6:31 PM
So our courageous Dems want to make sure that the corporate overlords stay happy during the holiday season in order to have another protracted shutdown that only hurts federal workers.
Sticking to their guns would have almost certainly resulted in the least amount of pain to working-class people.
Sticking to their guns would have almost certainly resulted in the least amount of pain to working-class people.
The cards: We do nothing and let people die or go bankrupt over medial expenses.
There’s zero humanity among MAGA.
There’s zero humanity among MAGA.
November 10, 2025 at 6:22 PM
The cards: We do nothing and let people die or go bankrupt over medial expenses.
There’s zero humanity among MAGA.
There’s zero humanity among MAGA.
The BBC did nothing wrong in its coverage of Trump.
People telling you that the BBC misled us on the Trump speech are sc-mbags and liars.
People telling you that the BBC misled us on the Trump speech are sc-mbags and liars.
November 10, 2025 at 6:20 PM
The BBC did nothing wrong in its coverage of Trump.
People telling you that the BBC misled us on the Trump speech are sc-mbags and liars.
People telling you that the BBC misled us on the Trump speech are sc-mbags and liars.
Anyone who doesn’t immediately vote to oust Schumer is our enemy.
November 10, 2025 at 6:17 PM
Anyone who doesn’t immediately vote to oust Schumer is our enemy.
Amen. They should be spared in that case but their time to act is growing short.
November 10, 2025 at 5:33 PM
Amen. They should be spared in that case but their time to act is growing short.
More than that.
Primary EVERY Dem Senator who doesn’t vote to oust him from leadership.
Schumer is a big problem, but he’s not the only problem; he has enablers.
Primary EVERY Dem Senator who doesn’t vote to oust him from leadership.
Schumer is a big problem, but he’s not the only problem; he has enablers.
November 10, 2025 at 3:50 PM
More than that.
Primary EVERY Dem Senator who doesn’t vote to oust him from leadership.
Schumer is a big problem, but he’s not the only problem; he has enablers.
Primary EVERY Dem Senator who doesn’t vote to oust him from leadership.
Schumer is a big problem, but he’s not the only problem; he has enablers.
In an apparent no-win situation, though, the correct response is to keep fighting and never give up, not lay down and die.
November 10, 2025 at 3:44 PM
In an apparent no-win situation, though, the correct response is to keep fighting and never give up, not lay down and die.
Like the Senate Democrats, I also try to have literal zero leverage when trying to negotiate. /s
November 10, 2025 at 3:20 PM
Like the Senate Democrats, I also try to have literal zero leverage when trying to negotiate. /s
That headline goes too far.
The court doesn’t want to use Kim Davis for that, but I’d bet they’d take a less toxic case to achieve the same.
The court doesn’t want to use Kim Davis for that, but I’d bet they’d take a less toxic case to achieve the same.
November 10, 2025 at 3:10 PM
That headline goes too far.
The court doesn’t want to use Kim Davis for that, but I’d bet they’d take a less toxic case to achieve the same.
The court doesn’t want to use Kim Davis for that, but I’d bet they’d take a less toxic case to achieve the same.
💯 agreement.
November 10, 2025 at 3:08 PM
💯 agreement.
Not being smart enough for that tracks with their apparent uselessness.
November 10, 2025 at 3:00 PM
Not being smart enough for that tracks with their apparent uselessness.
That, to me, reinforces MY point that he can seemingly do whatever he wants with respect to the schedule and I’ve yet to find anything that requires him to swear her in immediately, his previous comments, precedent, and what is most likely to happen notwithstanding.
November 10, 2025 at 2:59 PM
That, to me, reinforces MY point that he can seemingly do whatever he wants with respect to the schedule and I’ve yet to find anything that requires him to swear her in immediately, his previous comments, precedent, and what is most likely to happen notwithstanding.
Democrats: Stand for nothing; fall for everything.
November 10, 2025 at 2:53 PM
Democrats: Stand for nothing; fall for everything.
Read that section carefully.
It ties the oath to the “first session of Congress after every GENERAL election of Representatives” (emphasis mine).
That section is silent on special elections.
It ties the oath to the “first session of Congress after every GENERAL election of Representatives” (emphasis mine).
That section is silent on special elections.
November 10, 2025 at 2:50 PM
Read that section carefully.
It ties the oath to the “first session of Congress after every GENERAL election of Representatives” (emphasis mine).
That section is silent on special elections.
It ties the oath to the “first session of Congress after every GENERAL election of Representatives” (emphasis mine).
That section is silent on special elections.
It would be unprecedented to not swear her in, but not illegal.
They’ve done a lot of unprecedented 💩.
They’ve done a lot of unprecedented 💩.
November 10, 2025 at 2:47 PM
It would be unprecedented to not swear her in, but not illegal.
They’ve done a lot of unprecedented 💩.
They’ve done a lot of unprecedented 💩.
To what law are you referring?
The Constitution requires that Representatives take the oath of office but doesn’t state exactly when that should happen and who should administer said oath.
The Constitution requires that Representatives take the oath of office but doesn’t state exactly when that should happen and who should administer said oath.
November 10, 2025 at 2:40 PM
To what law are you referring?
The Constitution requires that Representatives take the oath of office but doesn’t state exactly when that should happen and who should administer said oath.
The Constitution requires that Representatives take the oath of office but doesn’t state exactly when that should happen and who should administer said oath.