James A Campbell
banner
rtbecard.bsky.social
James A Campbell
@rtbecard.bsky.social
(he/him) Former bird dude, current fish guy; currently based in Berlin. I'm into ecology, stats, bioacoustics, and artificial light.

Currently working as part of this ETN: https://www.msca-ribes.eu/
I'm surprised R doesn't already have ternary operators... especially since they added anonymous functions somewhat recently.

Here's my prettier --- but probably an awful idea --- take on the user-implemented ternary operator.
February 3, 2026 at 4:07 PM
Anybody have a link to the clip of Feynman that Dorothy is referring to at 20:30?
February 2, 2026 at 4:36 PM
Is this exclusively on spotify? It didn't show up when i searched it on my usual podcast platform.
February 2, 2026 at 3:27 PM
That did work! I had no idea u could get around paywalls so easily :/
January 29, 2026 at 5:49 PM
I hit my free article limit :(
January 29, 2026 at 4:01 PM
Is there a gift link for this article?
January 29, 2026 at 3:41 PM
Also, this panel is titled "top 15 AI methods" and includes PCA, logistic regression, and nearest neighbours!?

I'm so confused...
January 28, 2026 at 11:24 AM
I don't work in data science... So maybe im just missing details... But i don't have any idea what this study consideres to be an "AI-augmented" paper (which is kind of the most important detail).
January 28, 2026 at 11:24 AM
As much as i hate this... Almost every scientist i know uses chatGPT (i don't).

I think the overwheling demand for tools like this is indicitive of the broader problems we have in science.
January 28, 2026 at 9:50 AM
ya, I was pretty confused when I skimmed the journal description... it seemed to blur the lines between preprint and peer-reviewed articles in a confusing way. I'd be curious to know why the authors opted for this journal.
January 16, 2026 at 4:45 PM
Is there a gift link for the article?
January 10, 2026 at 4:48 PM
What exactly does the public engagement committee do?
January 9, 2026 at 7:09 PM
I would say squash it. A messy private history may just distract from the much more important public history. Users would only be interested in changes since they have started using the repo, right?
January 9, 2026 at 9:21 AM
i struggle to imagine why anyone would be interested in reading commit messages from a time before they had access to a repo.
January 9, 2026 at 9:19 AM
Of course. And libraries written in fortran are still in use today... But how on earth is this ranking higher than matlab?

The ranking metric takes into account searches... So this suggests a vast number of ppl are still actively learning and using it, which is wild to me.
January 4, 2026 at 6:49 PM