Rusty D. Pickens
@rusty.digital
Public interest technologist | Elevating digital frameworks | entrepreneur | proud Chickasaw
Imma go with Fraggle Rock for $1000 please, Chris 😂
🏛️🤯🤷🏼♂️
🏛️🤯🤷🏼♂️
February 9, 2026 at 10:26 PM
Imma go with Fraggle Rock for $1000 please, Chris 😂
🏛️🤯🤷🏼♂️
🏛️🤯🤷🏼♂️
Consumerism is killing society—and has already largely killed a free and open internet 😞
We need a massive incentive realignment and regulation around this or I fear we’re doomed.
We need a massive incentive realignment and regulation around this or I fear we’re doomed.
February 8, 2026 at 7:45 PM
Consumerism is killing society—and has already largely killed a free and open internet 😞
We need a massive incentive realignment and regulation around this or I fear we’re doomed.
We need a massive incentive realignment and regulation around this or I fear we’re doomed.
Reposted by Rusty D. Pickens
"We cannot allow any of the cases involving the abuse of the Polish children by a network of pedophiles and the organizer of this satanic circle, Mr. Epstein, to be treated lightly or ignored," Poland's prime minister said.
February 6, 2026 at 7:25 PM
"We cannot allow any of the cases involving the abuse of the Polish children by a network of pedophiles and the organizer of this satanic circle, Mr. Epstein, to be treated lightly or ignored," Poland's prime minister said.
Reposted by Rusty D. Pickens
Trump supporters claim that the Presidential Records Act grants incumbent Presidents authority to decide if a record is personal or presidential.
Which, of course, is ludicrously false.
This was the situation *prior* to the PRA, and what Congress expressly intended to end by passing the law. 🧵
Which, of course, is ludicrously false.
This was the situation *prior* to the PRA, and what Congress expressly intended to end by passing the law. 🧵
February 6, 2026 at 3:55 AM
Trump supporters claim that the Presidential Records Act grants incumbent Presidents authority to decide if a record is personal or presidential.
Which, of course, is ludicrously false.
This was the situation *prior* to the PRA, and what Congress expressly intended to end by passing the law. 🧵
Which, of course, is ludicrously false.
This was the situation *prior* to the PRA, and what Congress expressly intended to end by passing the law. 🧵