Every argument for AI is always some version of “but what if it was good?”
December 16, 2025 at 3:18 AM
Every argument for AI is always some version of “but what if it was good?”
Literally balancing it in Death Stranding
December 10, 2025 at 11:58 PM
Literally balancing it in Death Stranding
People like using them and they’re genuinely useful *while they’re cheap or free. At the appropriate cost that satisfies the value chain? Maybe $100 per month for help writing emails isn’t so valuable.
November 30, 2025 at 8:58 PM
People like using them and they’re genuinely useful *while they’re cheap or free. At the appropriate cost that satisfies the value chain? Maybe $100 per month for help writing emails isn’t so valuable.
In the moment with present facts? Probably not.
With hindsight? Shai + 5 picks for Paul George already looks real bad and will likely only get much, much worse.
With hindsight? Shai + 5 picks for Paul George already looks real bad and will likely only get much, much worse.
November 11, 2025 at 9:48 PM
In the moment with present facts? Probably not.
With hindsight? Shai + 5 picks for Paul George already looks real bad and will likely only get much, much worse.
With hindsight? Shai + 5 picks for Paul George already looks real bad and will likely only get much, much worse.
A gif you can hear
a man in a suit and tie says " you can 't swear at my fiancee ! "
ALT: a man in a suit and tie says " you can 't swear at my fiancee ! "
media.tenor.com
November 10, 2025 at 5:14 PM
A gif you can hear
He’d watch no games, actively hate the sport, and still be 1000% more entertaining
October 18, 2025 at 3:17 PM
He’d watch no games, actively hate the sport, and still be 1000% more entertaining
Bruce Willis as Jack Burton aka the Pork Chop Express would kinda rule ngl
October 6, 2025 at 3:30 AM
Bruce Willis as Jack Burton aka the Pork Chop Express would kinda rule ngl
Think he’s suggesting that the run differential is inflated because their blowout wins were big (e.g. winning by 10 when 5 would’ve still been a blowout). But if I understand the point of Pythagorean W-L is that stuff should normalize over the course of 162
September 29, 2025 at 6:12 PM
Think he’s suggesting that the run differential is inflated because their blowout wins were big (e.g. winning by 10 when 5 would’ve still been a blowout). But if I understand the point of Pythagorean W-L is that stuff should normalize over the course of 162
One of the few sports memories I have etched in my brain from a game not involving one of my teams. Seeing that point live was so effing cool.
September 17, 2025 at 3:53 PM
One of the few sports memories I have etched in my brain from a game not involving one of my teams. Seeing that point live was so effing cool.
Isn’t that technically politically correct?
September 13, 2025 at 3:39 PM
Isn’t that technically politically correct?