Rebecca Ying
banner
rying.bsky.social
Rebecca Ying
@rying.bsky.social
Cog Psych PhD candidate @ Iowa State University | eyewitness ID researcher | she/her | rcying.wixsite.com/site
Reposted by Rebecca Ying
It's been 20+ years since researchers recommended that police videorecord lineups. But no one has empirically tested the diagnostic value of these videos... until now.

Here, we provide a compelling case to mandate the videorecording of lineup procedures.
July 29, 2025 at 11:50 PM
Reposted by Rebecca Ying
Finding #3:
Witnesses' lineup behavior can diagnose high-confidence mistaken identifications. When witnesses are highly confident but their behavior indicates a weak and disfluent recognition experience, the CJS system should doubt their accuracy.
July 29, 2025 at 11:50 PM
Reposted by Rebecca Ying
Finding #2:
Not only did witness behaviors discriminate between accurate and inaccurate decisions, but they also improved classification performance over and above confidence and decision speed.
July 29, 2025 at 11:50 PM
Reposted by Rebecca Ying
Finding #1:
Accurate witnesses behaved markedly different than inaccurate witnesses—a strong and fluent recognition experience implied accuracy and a weak and disfluent recognition experience implied inaccuracy.
July 29, 2025 at 11:50 PM
July 29, 2025 at 11:57 PM
That’s kinda the idea behind dual process signal detection theory (DPSDT)! DPSDT posits that positive decisions are governed by two processes - recollection and familiarity- whereas negative (rejection) decisions are only governed by familiarity.
July 29, 2025 at 11:02 PM
These findings contradict recent inferences that in the context of eyewitness lineups, target variability is less than or equal to lure variability and brings models of eyewitness memory in line with longstanding findings from the basic recognition literature!
July 29, 2025 at 10:31 PM
Here, we examined DPSDT and UVSDT models & found that they were able to account for residual asymmetry (& improved model fit relative to the EVSDT model). These models suggest that the visual recognition system is better at detecting target presence than target absence.
July 29, 2025 at 10:30 PM
When lineups are modified so that we always get suspect-specific confidence (see prev work on the Rule Out), the rejection-inferiority effect is reduced but not eliminated.
July 29, 2025 at 10:30 PM
Lineups are a flawed measurement tool. Suspect IDs & confidence directly map on to how well the suspect matches the witness’s memory for the culprit- a good proxy for guilt. Conversely, rejection decisions & confidence often measure memory strength of a filler.
July 29, 2025 at 10:30 PM
Good luck on your talk- wish I could be there to see it!!! I’m really feeling the FOMO this year with so many cool eyewitness sessions 🫠
June 9, 2025 at 9:16 PM
Double-blind lineups
are still susceptible to
admin influence.

- Jones, “Blind Lineup Administrators’ Behaviors and Eyewitness Identifications”

#APLS2025 #AcademicHaiku #PsychLaw
March 13, 2025 at 10:21 PM