Aw, thanks you're so smart.

Unless it lets me stream games via steam link and also allow emulation of games that the manufacturers refuse to release or give any kind of support then I could care less.

Funnily enough they're like one the least controversial title sponsors that f1 has had. Probably the worst was the uralkali title sponsor who was just straight up a Russian oligarch company. And that sponsor was set up right before the invasion of Ukraine, got dropped when the invasion started.

it's really bad, don't do it to yourself

all in all games should be available as something for everyone regardless of platform or region. Obviously the world doesn't work that way, but gaming is an art form and we should not in anyway shape or form try to hinder art via current capitalistic means. But that's not likely to change atm

People should have the freedom to choose whatever they want and keeping those choices beholden to certain marketplaces could make a person choose a bad under powered console or something with little good games beyond the handful of exclusives they wanted

sorry, been offline for a minute and wanted to continue this discussion. What you're proposing is what we've had with current capitalism which is competing over the market place itself not competing within the market place which causes way more problems to consumer protection/freedom

But it only helps to serve the top end of the market, and the three console makers that do it. If you really worry about competition then you should want sony and Nintendo games on every platform to help bolster their sales and show their quality superiorty

I really hope more companies will take notice, I was always someone who felt like I abandoned a lot of cool and interesting titles when I made the move to PC. Hope this trend continues