Salenia the Cat🏴
@salenia.bsky.social
I'm just a Cat who's intentions are 🏴
She/Her
She/Her
It's still the same Nation-State it was before so, no. It has not collapsed. As much some people want to pretend that, ultimately not much has changed.
In fact most of what the USA currently does (and that includes Trump) it has already done in the past.
In fact most of what the USA currently does (and that includes Trump) it has already done in the past.
December 11, 2025 at 12:42 AM
It's still the same Nation-State it was before so, no. It has not collapsed. As much some people want to pretend that, ultimately not much has changed.
In fact most of what the USA currently does (and that includes Trump) it has already done in the past.
In fact most of what the USA currently does (and that includes Trump) it has already done in the past.
Now THAT is very true. Ultimately if we go down, we might as well go down fighting and take our chances.
December 10, 2025 at 11:56 PM
Now THAT is very true. Ultimately if we go down, we might as well go down fighting and take our chances.
I will say it, sadly, doesn't work that way every time. For every successful example there are also plenty unsuccessful ones.
But the argumentation that armed struggle is always fruitless and could never be achieved is just a blatant lie.
But the argumentation that armed struggle is always fruitless and could never be achieved is just a blatant lie.
December 10, 2025 at 11:01 PM
I will say it, sadly, doesn't work that way every time. For every successful example there are also plenty unsuccessful ones.
But the argumentation that armed struggle is always fruitless and could never be achieved is just a blatant lie.
But the argumentation that armed struggle is always fruitless and could never be achieved is just a blatant lie.
No but that way they will be better able to claim that everybody who is Anti-Zionist is automatically Anti-Jew and therefore Antisemitic.
The fact that Millions of Jews worldwide oppose Zionism makes that claim a lot more complicated you see?^^
The fact that Millions of Jews worldwide oppose Zionism makes that claim a lot more complicated you see?^^
December 10, 2025 at 10:59 PM
No but that way they will be better able to claim that everybody who is Anti-Zionist is automatically Anti-Jew and therefore Antisemitic.
The fact that Millions of Jews worldwide oppose Zionism makes that claim a lot more complicated you see?^^
The fact that Millions of Jews worldwide oppose Zionism makes that claim a lot more complicated you see?^^
Oh absolutely. The existence of radical groups, willing to utilize a variety of tactics is the very thing that pushed states to cave to the demands of moderates in the end and not actually the moderates themselves.
December 10, 2025 at 10:57 PM
Oh absolutely. The existence of radical groups, willing to utilize a variety of tactics is the very thing that pushed states to cave to the demands of moderates in the end and not actually the moderates themselves.
Yeah the IRA is actually an incredible example of exactly that still to this day. That was, literally, a bunch of people with Small Arms and Grenades completely exhausting the, at the time, biggest military power on earth completely.
Which even indirectly led to the fall of their Empire.
Which even indirectly led to the fall of their Empire.
December 10, 2025 at 10:55 PM
Yeah the IRA is actually an incredible example of exactly that still to this day. That was, literally, a bunch of people with Small Arms and Grenades completely exhausting the, at the time, biggest military power on earth completely.
Which even indirectly led to the fall of their Empire.
Which even indirectly led to the fall of their Empire.
actually effective brainwashing across the board, how realistic do you think that is?
Yet even then the Military will still own Weapons, no?
Yet even then the Military will still own Weapons, no?
December 10, 2025 at 10:51 PM
actually effective brainwashing across the board, how realistic do you think that is?
Yet even then the Military will still own Weapons, no?
Yet even then the Military will still own Weapons, no?
The State exists to violently uphold and enforce the order of the Capitalist Ruling-Class and therefore Private Property. The Police is the Institutions within the state which directly enforces that.
An unarmed police would need complete compliance from all the people in participation.
Apart from
An unarmed police would need complete compliance from all the people in participation.
Apart from
December 10, 2025 at 10:51 PM
The State exists to violently uphold and enforce the order of the Capitalist Ruling-Class and therefore Private Property. The Police is the Institutions within the state which directly enforces that.
An unarmed police would need complete compliance from all the people in participation.
Apart from
An unarmed police would need complete compliance from all the people in participation.
Apart from
there will surely be no problem for you to empirically prove that this is what factually always and inevitably will happen, right?
But the Police will never not be armed because violence is not just created by a stick or a gun. It is created by their very existence per definition.
But the Police will never not be armed because violence is not just created by a stick or a gun. It is created by their very existence per definition.
December 10, 2025 at 10:51 PM
there will surely be no problem for you to empirically prove that this is what factually always and inevitably will happen, right?
But the Police will never not be armed because violence is not just created by a stick or a gun. It is created by their very existence per definition.
But the Police will never not be armed because violence is not just created by a stick or a gun. It is created by their very existence per definition.
Okay me saying: "I want guns to defend myself against an oppressive system".
And then you going:
"But what if Civil war"
Do you maybe see an issue with that completely escalatory and illogical jump to conclusions here?
Does that end up being so?
Alright. So if that is always what happens
And then you going:
"But what if Civil war"
Do you maybe see an issue with that completely escalatory and illogical jump to conclusions here?
Does that end up being so?
Alright. So if that is always what happens
December 10, 2025 at 10:51 PM
Okay me saying: "I want guns to defend myself against an oppressive system".
And then you going:
"But what if Civil war"
Do you maybe see an issue with that completely escalatory and illogical jump to conclusions here?
Does that end up being so?
Alright. So if that is always what happens
And then you going:
"But what if Civil war"
Do you maybe see an issue with that completely escalatory and illogical jump to conclusions here?
Does that end up being so?
Alright. So if that is always what happens
"that an offense committed by another is similar or worse"
Which, literally, would mean that my point would have to be defending Trump with what I said.
Which is what I already told you, you absolute Plank xD
HOW AM I DEFENDING TRUMP BY SAYING HE ALSO DESERVES TO BE GUILLOTINED YOU MUPPET? 🤣
Which, literally, would mean that my point would have to be defending Trump with what I said.
Which is what I already told you, you absolute Plank xD
HOW AM I DEFENDING TRUMP BY SAYING HE ALSO DESERVES TO BE GUILLOTINED YOU MUPPET? 🤣
December 10, 2025 at 10:44 PM
"that an offense committed by another is similar or worse"
Which, literally, would mean that my point would have to be defending Trump with what I said.
Which is what I already told you, you absolute Plank xD
HOW AM I DEFENDING TRUMP BY SAYING HE ALSO DESERVES TO BE GUILLOTINED YOU MUPPET? 🤣
Which, literally, would mean that my point would have to be defending Trump with what I said.
Which is what I already told you, you absolute Plank xD
HOW AM I DEFENDING TRUMP BY SAYING HE ALSO DESERVES TO BE GUILLOTINED YOU MUPPET? 🤣
At this point just really Guillotine yourself and end it already.
Can't get any sadder.
Can't get any sadder.
December 10, 2025 at 10:43 PM
At this point just really Guillotine yourself and end it already.
Can't get any sadder.
Can't get any sadder.
Rojava had a standoff with the Syrian State.
Rojava still exists.
The Syrian State it opposed no longer does.
Feel free to prove your claim however :)
Rojava still exists.
The Syrian State it opposed no longer does.
Feel free to prove your claim however :)
December 10, 2025 at 10:33 PM
Rojava had a standoff with the Syrian State.
Rojava still exists.
The Syrian State it opposed no longer does.
Feel free to prove your claim however :)
Rojava still exists.
The Syrian State it opposed no longer does.
Feel free to prove your claim however :)
That would be an ad hom, not whataboutism you twatnose xD
And I didn't "attack the messenger" until he started riling against me.
You absolute fucking muppet.
But what are words even, right? 😂
And I didn't "attack the messenger" until he started riling against me.
You absolute fucking muppet.
But what are words even, right? 😂
December 10, 2025 at 10:21 PM
That would be an ad hom, not whataboutism you twatnose xD
And I didn't "attack the messenger" until he started riling against me.
You absolute fucking muppet.
But what are words even, right? 😂
And I didn't "attack the messenger" until he started riling against me.
You absolute fucking muppet.
But what are words even, right? 😂
Okay so me directly including Trump in the List of "Politicians who deserve to be Guillotined" gave you the impression that I'm trying to defend him... HOW THE FUCK? xD
Do you just not understand what "Guillotined" means?
Or are you just this fucking desperately lost in US-Dualism?
Do you just not understand what "Guillotined" means?
Or are you just this fucking desperately lost in US-Dualism?
December 10, 2025 at 10:17 PM
Okay so me directly including Trump in the List of "Politicians who deserve to be Guillotined" gave you the impression that I'm trying to defend him... HOW THE FUCK? xD
Do you just not understand what "Guillotined" means?
Or are you just this fucking desperately lost in US-Dualism?
Do you just not understand what "Guillotined" means?
Or are you just this fucking desperately lost in US-Dualism?
Are you still on about that despite me, literally, saying Trump should be Guillotined?
December 10, 2025 at 10:15 PM
Are you still on about that despite me, literally, saying Trump should be Guillotined?
Drone Strikes on Foreign Countries
War Crime
The military "Intervention" in Libya
War Crime
Support for Israel's Military action against the Palestinians and their Ethnic Cleansing
War Crime
Iraq- and Afghanistan War Support
War Crime.
Hillary Clinton is a War Criminal. Deal with it.
War Crime
The military "Intervention" in Libya
War Crime
Support for Israel's Military action against the Palestinians and their Ethnic Cleansing
War Crime
Iraq- and Afghanistan War Support
War Crime.
Hillary Clinton is a War Criminal. Deal with it.
December 10, 2025 at 10:14 PM
Drone Strikes on Foreign Countries
War Crime
The military "Intervention" in Libya
War Crime
Support for Israel's Military action against the Palestinians and their Ethnic Cleansing
War Crime
Iraq- and Afghanistan War Support
War Crime.
Hillary Clinton is a War Criminal. Deal with it.
War Crime
The military "Intervention" in Libya
War Crime
Support for Israel's Military action against the Palestinians and their Ethnic Cleansing
War Crime
Iraq- and Afghanistan War Support
War Crime.
Hillary Clinton is a War Criminal. Deal with it.
December 10, 2025 at 10:08 PM
If that was Whataboutism, my point would have to be in defense of Trump in the context here.
Which is a bit weird considering I literally include him right there.
For somebody calling herself the "logical monster", you don't really seem to grasp how that logical fallacy really works.
Which is a bit weird considering I literally include him right there.
For somebody calling herself the "logical monster", you don't really seem to grasp how that logical fallacy really works.
December 10, 2025 at 10:07 PM
If that was Whataboutism, my point would have to be in defense of Trump in the context here.
Which is a bit weird considering I literally include him right there.
For somebody calling herself the "logical monster", you don't really seem to grasp how that logical fallacy really works.
Which is a bit weird considering I literally include him right there.
For somebody calling herself the "logical monster", you don't really seem to grasp how that logical fallacy really works.
You lack the mental capacity to do that.
December 10, 2025 at 10:04 PM
You lack the mental capacity to do that.
She's a reactionary Christian and a Neoliberal through and through who comes from a wealthy background with her family having owned some big Corporations which were nationalized under Chavez and she welcomes a foreign military invasion of Venezuela against Maduro.
December 10, 2025 at 8:45 PM
She's a reactionary Christian and a Neoliberal through and through who comes from a wealthy background with her family having owned some big Corporations which were nationalized under Chavez and she welcomes a foreign military invasion of Venezuela against Maduro.