I argue for a radical publicity of normative theorizing. Such radical publicity derives from the fact that it is not chiefly the normative principles that should enjoy some stable public acceptance, but the key concepts themselves such as ‘democracy’ and ‘discrimination’. These ‘thick concepts’ contain both descriptive and normative content and are up for grabs in normative theorizing to an extent that has not been appreciated thus far by philosophers and theorists. My argument focuses on the case of normative theorizing about discrimination, and I review some pertinent recent examples of experimental philosophy that indicate what radical publicity might require and also sketch some further suggestions for meeting the requirements of radical publicity going forward.

Abstract This essay traces the history of refereeing at specialist scientific journals and at funding bodies and shows that it was only in the late twentieth century that peer review came to be seen a...

Kiinteistöliiton vanhempi lakiasiantuntija Tapio Haltia ei muista nähneensä aiemmin urallaan ratkaisua, jossa keittiö ja vessa ovat samassa tilassa.

Vihreiden puheenjohtajan Sofia Virran entinen puoliso on tuomittu Virran pahoinpitelystä. Virta jakoi sosiaalisessa median kommentteja miehiltä, joiden mielestä väkivalta oli oikein.

YouTube video by Carnegie Mellon University Libraries