Dan Schrider
@samurscicop.bsky.social
540 followers 410 following 71 posts
An aquatic ape studying population genetics at the University of North Carolina.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Dan Schrider
jeremymberg.bsky.social
When I was at NIH and shutdowns loomed, it was discovered that the administration was planning to shut down PubMed. The head of NCBI called the powers that be and pointed out that this would threaten patient safety

Who knows what will happen now

Just in case, remember Euruope-PMC
(europepmc.org )
a cartoon of donald trump with the words be prepared above him
ALT: a cartoon of donald trump with the words be prepared above him
media.tenor.com
samurscicop.bsky.social
Interesting news about grants to prevent mass violence being canceled in MN and elsewhere. "Not all ...have been canceled. Asked about two grants awarded to the sheriff’s office in Palm Beach County, Florida – where Mar-a-Lago is located – a sheriff’s office spokesperson said the grants are active."
Reposted by Dan Schrider
jeremymberg.bsky.social
WARNING WARNING WARNING

#ResearchAdmini

I am hearing reports of NIH Awards being issued with ~15% indirect cost rate without comment. I believe the hope is that they will be accepted with noticing this.
a woman stands in front of a white board with the words you need to be careful written on it
ALT: a woman stands in front of a white board with the words you need to be careful written on it
media.tenor.com
samurscicop.bsky.social
All true but still probably a better outcome than we could have expected. This is what good news looks like for scientists these days...
Reposted by Dan Schrider
jeremymberg.bsky.social
I have a first serious attempt to estimate the consequences of multi-year funding for July.

For new R01s, the amount of additional expenditure was

$135 M

The number of additional R01s that could have been funded is

182

1/9
a man in a shirt and tie is touching his forehead
ALT: a man in a shirt and tie is touching his forehead
media.tenor.com
samurscicop.bsky.social
This is an important point about the NIH's new multi-year funding model that many PIs (even some senior ones) aren't aware of:
jeremymberg.bsky.social
Same as always. The funds are committed but the institution only gets them as reimbursements when they are spent. Since "NIH" is now comfortable terminating grants (and this could get worse after October 1st with the new Executive Order, there isn't much real benefit to institutions or PIs.
hanseatic.bsky.social
Is there any more clarity on how the multi-year funding works? Are PIs just getting the funds obligated or are they actually getting all the funding up front?
Reposted by Dan Schrider
samurscicop.bsky.social
Disregard my question, and see: bsky.app/profile/davi...
davidimiller.bsky.social
The formal provision was adopted as an amendment.

Bill text will be updated later with it:
davidimiller.bsky.social
Here's the provision to block multi-year funding:

(the bill text PDF will later be updated with this as an adopted amendment: www.appropriations.senate.gov/imo/media/do...)
samurscicop.bsky.social
Was there actually any discussion of such an amendment in committee today?
samurscicop.bsky.social
There was also some mention of the bill containing some kind of effort to stop the forward-funding policy but the statement I heard was very vague. Anyone have any idea what that was about?
Reposted by Dan Schrider
donmoyn.bsky.social
New, from an anonymous NIH insider: Trump is being pushed to spend more NIH money. The White House is ordering NIH to do multi-year budgets for awards. This budget trick means fewer awards, fewer labs funded, and lower paylines for researchers. 🧵
donmoynihan.substack.com/p/alert-the-...
Alert: The Trump administration is quietly slashing new NIH grant awards, and it's not via the budget
NIH’s sudden move to multiyear grant funding is forcing shocking cuts in the number of grants funded. This is an effective budget cut. It's bad, folks.
donmoynihan.substack.com
samurscicop.bsky.social
Thanks for the info. Fingers crossed!
samurscicop.bsky.social
Anyone know if NIH T funding mechanisms are still comatose?
Reposted by Dan Schrider
tylervkent.bsky.social
Excellent work out from postdoc Remi Ketchum in @samurscicop.bsky.social's lab 👊🔥🦟
biorxiv-evobio.bsky.social
Signatures of soft selective sweeps predominate in the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.07.06.663360v1
Reposted by Dan Schrider
savehealthresearch.bsky.social
Thank you to Natalie for being a voice for thousands of clinical trial patients who are not receiving the care they were promised. This is powerful.

www.instagram.com/reel/DLflEqh...
Reposted by Dan Schrider
samurscicop.bsky.social
The (old) NIH made some recent-ish changes that address this somewhat, but I don't think it can be fully addressed unless more $ (higher grant success rates) is part of the solution. Anyway none of this matters because the whole system has just been nuked and the consequences will be catastrophic.
samurscicop.bsky.social
Yes that is clearly true, but it is absolutely clear that low success rates (which are about to get WAY) lower, play a big role in this.
samurscicop.bsky.social
So by extension, when NSF grant success rates drop from ~25% to 7% after the coming budget cut there will be no move towards even more risk-averse science. Good to know!