If you make a new policy and don't punish them for breaking it, they'll ignore it. If you try to punish individual officers for breaking it, they'll club together to frustrate the process.
The trouble is that American police are contemptuous of and insubordinate to civil authority, and there's not a realistic way to reform their behavior that's less drastic than abolition
Anxiety about identity and inheritance was pretty dang acute before the demographic transition, when "my kid takes over the family farm" was most people's retirement plan
It’s not the whole story but part of it has gotta be that Trump is a million years old and stopped learning new things somewhere around 1992 and as such tends to be fixated on bits of 20th century pop culture that nobody else thinks about much any more
Not to mention, Disney un-suspended Kimmel, which is what the boycotters wanted. If your boycott is actually effective in incentivizing the target to give you your demands, then once they do that you want the stock to go back up
AUTISM ANNOUNCEMENT: Please don't try to talk to me while I'm listening to someone else on the phone. When you do that I can't understand either of you.
Wouldn't every single opinion writer have views that cost them opportunities? Most publications have some sort of editorial stance, and if your work is compatible with all of them that's an admission you have no fixed views of your own.
One playoff share for winning the pennant is worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. For winning the WS it's over half a million. To make it worth Clase's while you'd have to pay him enough money that the transaction would be hard to hide.
Sure, but it wasn't run by a single unqualified doofus (at worst, it had a committee of marginally-qualified doofuses), nor was it constantly engaged in religious or ethnic massacres (not that it had zero, but these were the exception to its usual rule of cultural integration and assimilation )
