Save America Movement
banner
saveamericamvmt.bsky.social
Save America Movement
@saveamericamvmt.bsky.social
This is not just a matter of military policy or a single incident. It tests whether power is accountable or above the law. The administration’s next moves, transparency or silence, will reveal whether justice or impunity guides American force.
December 2, 2025 at 11:00 PM
Legal experts and former military lawyers assert that killing survivors violates both U.S. law and international humanitarian law. The administration’s justification is being challenged. Many warn that authorizing a strike on incapacitated persons is far from defensible.
December 2, 2025 at 11:00 PM
Some bipartisan lawmakers are demanding transparency. Committee chairs in Congress have publicly pledged vigorous oversight. They call for the release of the drone video, full statements from key actors, and hearings to determine the facts behind the alleged follow-on strike.
December 2, 2025 at 11:00 PM
Meanwhile, Hegseth pushed back hard. On social media, he dismissed the allegations as “fake news” meant to discredit U.S. forces. He reaffirmed that all recent strikes obey “U.S. and international law.” That defense deepens the divide between public optics and legal scrutiny.
December 2, 2025 at 11:00 PM
Donald Trump has publicly expressed that he would not have wanted a second strike on survivors. He reiterated his trust in Hegseth’s denial of issuing a “kill everybody” order. That statement attempts to distance him personally from the decision.
December 2, 2025 at 11:00 PM
Administration aides describe the action as part of a regional campaign against “narco-terrorists.” They maintain that both strikes complied with the law of armed conflict, yet international observers say the second attack on survivors cannot be justified.
December 2, 2025 at 11:00 PM
The White House insists the second strike was approved by Admiral Frank M. Bradley, not by Hegseth directly. Officials argue the mission targeted narcotics traffickers and was conducted under standing counter-terrorism authorities. Questions remain over legality.
December 2, 2025 at 11:00 PM
On this giving Tuesday, if you are willing and able, consider supporting the Liberty Van initiative.

(Link below)
December 2, 2025 at 4:44 PM
Liberty Van crews are on the ground in the hottest zones of ICE activity year round.
December 2, 2025 at 4:44 PM
This is not about politics. It is about principle. If Pete Hegseth gave an order to kill survivors, he should face justice for it. The law cannot be optional for those who wield lethal power in America’s name.
December 2, 2025 at 3:18 AM
Accountability is the foundation of lawful command. If a U.S. official gives an illegal order, justice demands investigation and prosecution. Anything less erodes faith in the rule of law and the honor of service.
December 2, 2025 at 3:18 AM
The victims were not armed threats. They were drowning men. To end their lives was to strip them of the very protection the law of war exists to preserve. That act disgraces every uniform sworn to uphold it.
December 2, 2025 at 3:18 AM
Experts across the legal and military communities agree. The second strike described under Hegseth’s direction constitutes denial of quarter. That means executing those unable to fight back. It is a prosecutable offense.
December 2, 2025 at 3:18 AM
The Rome Statute and U.S. Code 18 §2441 define the deliberate killing of defenseless persons as a war crime. No battlefield confusion or chain of command excuses this. Command responsibility is absolute.
December 2, 2025 at 3:18 AM
The principle of distinction requires separating combatants from civilians. Survivors of a destroyed vessel are no longer combatants. Ordering their deaths is an unlawful killing under both U.S. and international law.
December 2, 2025 at 3:18 AM
International law is clear. Those shipwrecked or injured are protected as “hors de combat.” Killing them violates the Geneva Conventions and the U.S. War Crimes Act. If the reports are true, Hegseth most likely committed a war crime.
December 2, 2025 at 3:18 AM
This is how democracy erodes: not through coups, but through contributions. The Enablers Entourage exists to make sure those trades between power and principle are named for what they are.
November 29, 2025 at 9:31 PM
When the company that controls global discourse finances political power, transparency becomes theater. The line between platform and state blurs into influence.
November 29, 2025 at 9:31 PM
These weren’t donations. They were investments in silence. Meta purchased goodwill and regulatory peace under the banner of civic participation.
November 29, 2025 at 9:31 PM
Meta’s mission statement speaks of “empowering communities.” But proximity to power is not empowerment, it’s protection. And protection is what this payment secured.
November 29, 2025 at 9:31 PM