The Scandinavian Journal of Economics
@scandjecon.bsky.social
290 followers 1 following 26 posts
Established in 1899 and dedicated to the publication of economics research, the SJE is one of the oldest general-interest economics journals in Europe.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
scandjecon.bsky.social
Based on these impacts, the study estimates that the JRS cost between €2,260 and €5,950 per job-year saved. This is notably lower than similar programs in other countries, likely due to differences in income levels and JRS design.
scandjecon.bsky.social
Participation in the JRS demonstrably influenced both the likelihood of firm survival (extensive margin) and employment dynamics within surviving firms (intensive margin).
scandjecon.bsky.social
Their findings reveal a clear positive impact: firms that participated in the JRS maintained higher employment levels than those that did not, with this effect lasting at least until the end of 2021.
scandjecon.bsky.social
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...

A team of @LatvijasBanka economists investigated whether the Job Retention Schemes (JRS) in Latvia during the Covid-19 pandemic helped save jobs. Using firm-level data, they assessed JRS impacts on employment both during and after the height of the pandemic.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
scandjecon.bsky.social
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...

Socio-economic differences in longevity have fuelled a debate about pension systems' regressive bias towards groups with a high life expectancy. This paper looks at distributional implications of such pooling, as well as indexing benefits to prices and wages.
The distributional implications of pension benefit indexation
Socio-economic differences in longevity have fuelled a debate on whether pension systems have a regressive bias favouring groups with a high life expectancy. We show that the distributional implicati...
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
scandjecon.bsky.social
*Table 9: Backlash vs. Persuasion Effects over Time*
This graph illustrates the short-term backlash followed by longer-term shifts in public opinion, showing how abortion precedents initially provoke opposition but eventually lead to increased acceptance.
scandjecon.bsky.social
*Table 7: Summary of Abortion Attitudes by Political Affiliation*
This table summarizes shifts in public opinion on abortion legality, segmented by political affiliation after abortion-related court rulings.
scandjecon.bsky.social
Here are three relevant graphs and tables.
*Figure 1: Impact of Circuit Court Rulings on State Abortion
Regulations*
This graph displays the percentage likelihood of states enacting or maintaining restrictive abortion laws following pro-abortion or anti-abortion court rulings.
scandjecon.bsky.social
While initial backlash to abortion rulings is common, long-term effects suggest that legal precedents often reshape societal norms.
#NormChange
#AbortionJurisprudence #LawInAction
scandjecon.bsky.social
Pro-abortion court rulings can increase Republican opposition to abortion by as much as 20%, showing how judicial decisions can polarize public opinion.
#Polarization #PublicOpinion
scandjecon.bsky.social
States are 18% more likely to restrict abortion access within 2 years of an anti-abortion judicial precedent, illustrating the profound influence of Circuit Court rulings.
#PolicyEffect #ReproductiveRights
scandjecon.bsky.social
Judges' biographical characteristics strongly influence abortion case outcomes, revealing the intersection of personal backgrounds and policy effects.
#JudicialImpact #AbortionLaw
scandjecon.bsky.social
An overview of the journal's first century can be found here.

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...