We sued him for taking bribes through his hotel in the first time, and they argued that promoting his own hotel was part of his official duties, so I unfortunately have some familiarity with this

Would be nice, but nope. Nixon v. Fitzgerald case says Pres. is immune civilly from anything based on his “official acts”, and this SupCt would certainly say shitposting is among his official acts - presidential statements.

Yes, for the places just advertising specials and happy hours, makes sense, I mean all of us talking about them

Guilty. Celebrated my 40th at Pilar. But why doesn’t dc restaurant twitter just all move here? What is the appeal there, just numbers inflated by bots?

time to correct that

and the national R base is likely going to hate him!

wait, you sued Project Veritas, without us "The Veritas Law Firm"? We were made for this

Yeah, can't say I've seen a restaurant react like this before, not usually something they want to draw attention to

You want really crazy, try here in DC where the elected AG can't prosecute crimes, and only the Trump appointed US Attorney is in control

The issue here is that the AG in Wisconsin went to civil court because that is his basic jurisdiction - civil claims. It would be up to the District Attorney to prosecute it as a crime, and the DA with jurisdiction here looks to be a Republican - so you know how that goes

Thank you.

The DOJ "respectfully notifies" the Judge that they are defying the Court's Order. Wonder if that will make it ok?

Yes!

Correct. With Congress unwilling to impeach, and higher Courts giving immunity from prosecution, it's more of a suggestion. At least that's how things seem to work now.

that is what you get for posting it on Truth Social !

But do you also hear “the channel you cheer for” ?

Would think “recent events” might cause them to reconsider