Samuel Delorme
banner
sdelorme.bsky.social
Samuel Delorme
@sdelorme.bsky.social
🍁 philosophy phd student chillin like a villain at ucsd

studying the makings of effort, control, and moral competence
only works if the outhouse discourse is shit
November 10, 2024 at 11:43 PM
Really anticipated the flock of nietzschean dudebros who love Rome a little too much
April 14, 2024 at 5:17 PM
ive been playing fallout new vegas for weeks, i didnt realize until you posted about it that they made a show for we the gamers
April 14, 2024 at 5:01 AM
My favourite part about Dante's Comedia is the only moderate amount of imperialism
March 26, 2024 at 3:34 AM
i see the large red circle as the nearest, and the small red circle as the farthest.
January 23, 2024 at 10:13 PM
what amor fati, in nietzche's expression of it, seems to preclude, is the decrying of injustice. can be seen here in his new years resolution. and that is a problem.
January 2, 2024 at 3:53 PM
finding an honest way to look at the past and affirming it is a source of resilience, identity, and gratitude. it's a great good to be invulnerable in one's love of life.

theres a concern that one will care less about shaping the future. yet courage to try can come from the confidence to fail.
January 2, 2024 at 3:47 PM
je ne suis jamais d'accord avec elle, pourtant c'est dommage (et inquiétant) qu'exprimer autre chose que du mépris pour les articles de callard demande un certain courage ces jours-ci
December 4, 2023 at 5:51 AM
small is not so bad -- imo for social networks there is certainly such a thing as too big, most networks far exceed the optimal size.
November 28, 2023 at 9:08 PM
Acts for Aristotle are not good unless they emerge out of and/or contribute to the development of virtuous
dispositions.

But the dispositions are no good if they are not enacted. Suppressed virtue is no good either. The virtuous comatose agent is not leading a good life.
November 18, 2023 at 11:13 PM
i am also a lover--might you perchance name some of your favourite essays?
November 6, 2023 at 2:26 AM
thats quite different from the philosophical accounts of internality presented by, say, frankfurt and jaworksa. there its all about the agent's subjective states. on their views, the appraiser's conception of the good is totally beside the point. not so here, tho. thanks for sharing.
November 4, 2023 at 5:13 PM
the 'good true self' stuff is cool. the fact that we are disposed to attribute those actions *we* deem good as internal to the agent, and the bad ones as external, suggests that when we assess internality we do so with reference to a conception of the good and the good life.
November 4, 2023 at 5:09 PM
can be tough to tell who fades through and through and who will rise again once they fit the styles, values, and concerns of the day. anecdotally, i hear much more affection for bergson than the others. strikes me that many care for him, but it isn't so easy to square him into contemporary debates.
October 23, 2023 at 5:31 AM
i enjoyed but wasn't stunned by piranesi, but this did indeed make it more sublime to my eyes, ty 🙏
October 12, 2023 at 4:02 PM
it also transforms people. i see a lot of people who feel pressure to have a take. worried they'll be guilty by omission, that their silence is unjust.
October 12, 2023 at 3:03 PM
lire albert camus en français 💕
October 11, 2023 at 6:57 AM
questions for mole and for us:

1. Are Weil/Murdoch+ right that the common exalted region of attention between study ^ morality is vindicated by exclusion? Exclusion of ego/clinging specifically?

2. Is this the right/only strategy for vindicating the moral quality of cultivating attentiveness?
October 9, 2023 at 4:33 AM
for murdoch the common salience structure between the two is one that is excluded: "the fat relentless ego".

for weil the excluded salience structures are those that demand of, latch onto the world. (quote below)

answer for both lies in what study and moral attentiveness exclude, not share (4/4)
October 9, 2023 at 4:28 AM
question that follows: what is the common salience structure between studying calculus and the correct moral orientation towards the world, such that exposure to patterns in calculus (tho not necessarily consc. noticing) would make one better at noticing moral patterns? (3/4)
October 9, 2023 at 4:25 AM
prior exposure to regularities in a 'region' of attention (he calls em 'salience structures') will make new patterns/stimuli in those structures more salient. this is, he proposes, a vindication of the Weil/Mudorch+ emphasis on the value of attention as found in prayer, study of mathematics. (2/4)
October 9, 2023 at 4:23 AM