I never see her in the press except when she's lifting major trophies....

He's a much better puppet than mastermind, but I do think he's in it deeper than anyone on the outside knew.

follow the money. (Ironic for Dani, when she's done what she can, her masters will throw her out...)

Highly unlikey that he wrote this but that doesn't mitigate it. They are acting on the theory that they are the only authority and they demand humiliating capitulation. I think they believe it, but they need to lose.

"lack of flexibility" meaning rules that require public spending and not a redirection to private profiteers?

great, now this gets messier because some anti-semites will start to point fingers and make false correlations, maybe even Massie will do that, I don't know. The underlying connection is capital and money doesn't care who you revere.

No. He may object violently to pedophilia but he's still a Republican racist bully

probably not. The American academy is reliant on corporate charity and though they don't have shareholders, they do have arrogance and the need for money outweighs what many of them consider to be just middle class moralizing. IOW, the academy is complicit.

yea! can we make them all so famous that is impossible for them to keep them?

You will learn. Keep in mind that the puppy is a complex creature with a personality trying to communicate with you. Work together. Know that if you are frustrated, so probably is the pup. Emphasize the fun things. Most of all, be his person, his biggest protector and giver of scritches..

Pretty much, except you forgot the part where they hold themselves up to scions of virtue and representatives of god.

I'm old and an immigrant. I don't get it.

I take your point, but I think he's talking about the normalization of it. It doesn't matter what your political stripe, money protects money. Women and girls are products to be bought, sold, used and thrown away like paper products. So capitalism and misogyny have a baby and you get Epstein.

Of course it is linguistic hairsplitting. So what's your point in making the distinction?

I don't use Google. I was curious as to what this kind of linguistic hairsplitting bought you. The answer seems to be room to claim moral righteousness for the colonists ( who gave them permission to stay?); presumption to subjugate today's travellers and then, of course, authorizing the sneer.

please explain the difference between a colonist and an immigrant?

except the concept of ownership is an idea that immigrated with the colonists.

even if your ancestors came over on the Mayflower....