Looking forward to getting back from the holidays and doing the same! The canyon formations looked great with some Heroscape jungle pieces I had even in PLA grey

It isn't really relevant in a discussion of the pros and cons of ChatGPT/LLMs, which is how you started the discussion. There's no reason to believe LLMs have any application in medicine, so it's not relevant.

ChatGPT and other LLMs are a technology known as generative AI which is fundamentally different from the machine learning AI that you're referring to in this application.

If someone modeled a set of wargaming minis based on Ratchet and Clank, I'd buy the whole range. Would be fun to field a Tyhrranoid or Thugs 4 Less army in #OnePageRules @insomniac.games

My time to shine!

Does everybody's bottle of Vallejo Silver break like that?

An embedded IoT hub I worked on functioned kind of like this. You didn't call sleep in the handler for any event, but you would spawn a thread which would sleep and then queue another event. In retrospect it probably would've been nice to have a clocked queue so we didn't spin up so many threads.

Buy a starter set that comes with two factions and you'll likely have enough to run two OPR armies at low point levels. Invite some friends to play, you'd be surprised how many people will give it a shot if they just have to show up and play.

It ended up being more subtle than I wanted but I tried to spice up the rocks with some veins of blue ore ala #Runescape mithril, perhaps the raw form of whatever eventually becomes beskar

I don't know if you've ever played Risk, but it's generally not a good thing to be neighbors with a belligerent lunatic.

There appear to be a bunch of Zionists in these threads just saying unsubstantiated stuff to slander the DSA.

I once had an I2C communication bug caused by motor noise on a robot arm which was very hard to prove because you can't just attach probes to a moving arm like that.

You are putting words in my mouth. There is no gay gene. There are existing treatments that try to make people straight that are banned (as they should be) in many states. My point is that there are straightforward cases and we should help people when we can.

I work in sports data, no way in hell should anyone be gambling on sports. There was a brief window a decade ago where someone with the right training could expect to win some money (someone I know was banned from early platforms after making a decent bit), but that's a long way gone now.

No, but if those genes existed I would be okay with sickle cell disease. I think it's possible to regulate this so-called "eugenics" to narrowly allow for prevention of disease. There might be areas folks see as grey, but that shouldn't prevent us from tackling extremely straightforward cases.

It doesn't make sense to force people to repeat a process with some randomness if it's possible to simply cut through the randomness with gene editing to get the same result. This just results in better outcomes for those with the wealth to repeat the process.

There is no way to measure the criteria of "society isn't ready for this" and in the meantime children are being born with diseases that could be prevented. With IVF, people are already screening out some of these and I don't think it's appropriate to call that eugenics.