Shravan Vasishth
@shravanvasishth.bsky.social
250 followers 63 following 45 posts
Professor of Psycholinguistics, University of Potsdam, Germany. Outside of work: Classical guitar, beginning student of piano. I like our cats, on occasion. Web page: vasishth.github.io
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
shravanvasishth.bsky.social
New preprint investigating whether lossy-context surprisal can account for the locality and expectation effects found in Russian, Hindi, and Persian reading data: osf.io/preprints/ps...
OSF
osf.io
shravanvasishth.bsky.social
We are done with the ninth Statistical Methods for Linguistics and Psychology (SMLP) summer school, Potsdam, Germany. The tenth edition is planned for 24-28 August 2026.
shravanvasishth.bsky.social
A common disease in academia is that for any position X there is an academic with an opposing position not-X. It's just how academics are. One can't just blindly follow one or another person's recommendation, but develop a good understanding of it oneself, and draw one's own conclusions.
shravanvasishth.bsky.social
I guess then we should also recommend against using p-values because they are sensitive to the likelihood function assumed? :) Who was it that gave this recommendation? I'm guessing SIngmann but maybe I'm wrong.
shravanvasishth.bsky.social
Because this is a frequently asked question in summer schools I teach, I am thinking about adding a video lecture on this in my online materials for the book. Do also read the online chapter from our book on this topic:

bruno.nicenboim.me/bayescogsci/...
D Model comparison - Extended | Introduction to Bayesian Data Analysis for Cognitive Science
Introduction to Bayesian data analysis for Cognitive Science.
bruno.nicenboim.me
shravanvasishth.bsky.social
Also:

Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological science, 25(1), 7-29.

Kruschke, J. K. (2011). Bayesian assessment of null values via parameter estimation and model comparison. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 299-312.

epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/74222/
Bayesian Decisions using Regions of Practical Equivalence (ROPE): Foundations
epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de
shravanvasishth.bsky.social
Some other books to read:

Royall, R. (2017). Statistical evidence: a likelihood paradigm. Routledge.

Spiegelhalter, D. (2024). The art of uncertainty: how to navigate chance, ignorance, risk and luck. Random House.
shravanvasishth.bsky.social
Spiegelhalter, D. J., Abrams, K. R., & Myles, J. P. (2004). Bayesian approaches to clinical trials and health-care evaluation. John Wiley & Sons.
shravanvasishth.bsky.social
You can use the credible interval to think about whether the pattern is consistent with the predicted effect. Even better if you can compare that interval to a model's a priori predicted interval. Read Spiegelhalter's 2004 book:
shravanvasishth.bsky.social
That's what the likelihood ratio test (aka anova) does, you compare likelihoods under the null and non-null to decide whether to reject the null. Bayes factors compare marginal likelihoods but the idea is the same. See our BF chapter.
shravanvasishth.bsky.social
E.g., if my data point is 0, the likelihood of mu being 0 (assuming sd=1) is dnorm(0,0,1). The lik. of mu being 10 is dnorm(0,10,1), which is much smaller than that of dnorm(0,0,1). So I'd favor mu=0 over mu=10. If the data point were 10, the lik. of mu=10 is much higher, and I would reject mu=0.
shravanvasishth.bsky.social
So with Bayes factors you'd compute the marginal likelihoods under the two models and compare them.
shravanvasishth.bsky.social
To make a discovery claim, I would have to set up two models, m0 where the effect is 0, and mfull, where it is not. Then I can talk about the relative evidence assuming a null or a non-null effect. 2/2
shravanvasishth.bsky.social
I would say that both credible intervals in my example are *consistent* with the effect being positive, but I would not go so far as to make a discovery claim. 1/2
shravanvasishth.bsky.social
Just a quick question first: If the Bayesian 95% Credible interval is [0.0000001,100] you would reject the null, and if it is [-0.0000001,99], would you fail to reject or even accept the null?
shravanvasishth.bsky.social
Next week onwards, I'm teaching a five-day introductory course on Bayesian Data Analysis in Gent. Newly recorded video lectures to accompany the course are now online: vasishth.github.io/LecturesIntr...
Shravan Vasishth's Intro Bayes course home page
vasishth.github.io
shravanvasishth.bsky.social
In person (no streaming/zoom) sentence processing workshop at Potsdam with Tal Linzen, Brian Dillon, Titus von der Malsburg, Oezge Bakay, William Timkey, Pia Schoknecht, Michael Vrazitulis, and Johan Hennert:

vasishth.github.io/sentproc-wor...
Sentence processing workshop, May 27, 2025
vasishth.github.io
shravanvasishth.bsky.social
New study on local coherence, led by Pia Schoknecht :

The time course of local coherence effects: Evidence from self-paced reading times and event-related potentials

osf.io/preprints/os...
OSF
osf.io
shravanvasishth.bsky.social
@cos.io Are you aware that in restructuring your website you have destroyed many repositories? The new Files directory is empty, and add-ons to github repos no longer work. WTF?
shravanvasishth.bsky.social
Computational Psycholinguistics Meeting 2025

cpl2025.sites.uu.nl

When: December 18–19, 2025

Where: Utrecht, the Netherlands

Abstract submission deadline: June 15, 2025

Organizers: Jakub Dotlačil, Lena Jäger, Bruno Nicenboim, Ece Takmaz
Computational Psycholinguistics Meeting 2025 | Universiteit Utrecht
Universiteit Utrecht
cpl2025.sites.uu.nl