Thank you, Eric. Each panel only shows the publishers that have been part of the "top 5" at some point during this period, according to each database.

How do we know this? Because (rather) inclusive databases such as @dimensions.ai and #OpenAlex provide a more complete image of what is out there, compared to the restrictive Web of Science.

Thank you, Laura! We are trying to keep it updated to make it useful in the long term. So please feel free to contact me if for any updates, improvements, suggestions, or questions in general.

This is common for book reviews, the titles of which often include the title of the book reviewed. I have seen this frequently for content on erudit.org. It has nothing to do with questionable practice.

📣📚 Call for applications - ends April 16

There is less than 3 weeks left to apply to our annual call for applications. Quebec and Canadian scholarly journals wishing to be disseminated on our platform, here is your chance!

For more details: apropos.erudit.org/call-for-app...

À moins que vous ayez d'autres données, la figure ne montre pas que le développement du réseau cyclable nuit aux déplacements en TC. Pourquoi ce ne sera pas la place qu'on laisse à l'auto qui en est la cause? D'autant plus car ce sont justement les déplacements en auto qui ont augmenté.

Les données sont déjà disponibles sur notre Dataverse Boréales : doi.org/10.5683/SP3/....

→ Are you studying #scholarlycommunication, research dissemination or doing a research project in #digitalhumanities ?⁠

#CoalitionPublica is accepting scholarship applications until April 18.⁠
👉 www.coalition-publi.ca/news-nouvell...