A great question - I have sent you a DM.

Most schools recognise elements of more than one. The work is noticing what’s intentional, and what isn’t.

Strategic & Sustainable
Curriculum is universally designed, accessible, and ambitious for every learner. Inclusion is a thread across subjects, assessment, and enrichment. Teachers systematically plan for barriers, ensuring full access and high expectations.

Evolving
Curriculum planning includes adaptive teaching and some universal design strategies. Teachers plan with potential barriers in mind, but consistency and coherence vary.

Reactive
Curriculum assumes a 'one size fits all' model. Adjustments are made only when problems arise. Students with SEND or EAL risk being excluded from full participation.

And if now isn’t the moment, that’s fine too.
Everything else is already there when you need it.

Right here: www.simpang.org/resources

Mike

A short, open conversation.
No pitch.
No pressure.
Just a chance to explore whether a partnership would genuinely add value for your context.

If at some point you’re curious about what working more closely together might look like, Simpang Start is always open.

www.simpang.org/start

Nothing here exists to prove expertise.
It exists to support it.

Just different entry points, depending on what you need at that moment.

You’ll find practical tools, longer reflections, structured pathways, short prompts, conversations, and quiet spaces to think.
Use one thing. Use everything. Come and go as you need to.

Some are there simply to provide rhythm, perspective, and reassurance across the year.

No hierarchy.
No expectation to “keep up”.
No sense of being behind.

Most school leaders don’t need motivation.
They need space, clarity, and a way to think without pressure.

Everything within Simpang exists for that reason.

Some resources are designed to help leaders get their bearings quickly.
Others create room to slow down and think properly.