Seriously. In the Nordics/Baltics by we have a GDP of 2 trillion. We have low debts. If it's existential to us we could do it alone for the rest of the decade.

For me it's "it is futile I said. You can never -- you lie, he cried, and ran on" also by Crane. Very similar vibe!

The protagonist in the recent James Gunn movie works as a reporter.

Yeah but we don't know what the societal reaction against LLM blandness will be. It doesn't have to play out as a carbon copy of the reaction to photography. There might be other ways for humans to express individuality in writing that we haven't thought of. We'll see. It's early yet.

Just like photography made all art be photorealistic.

Here: arxiv.org/abs/2510.07591

The authors of the paper highlight the understanding of LLM aspect. It was much better at some more common types of grammatical structures than others.

They also mention that it might be useful for translation into low resource languages in the future but the results aren't good enough yet.

Not all of the rest of America. Alaska is still free not part of Greater Saskatchewan.

But if you ask ChatGPT to introspect about its thinking process most of the answer will be drawn from the knowledge in the LLM not from the prompt.

But Masnick's post is true about LLMs. They are in some sense just really fancy autocompletes. Puck's objection is an objection about how an LLM based chat system works, with system prompts and memories. If you ask ChatGPT about its system prompt you can get good answers.

If you are arguing about whether LLM introspection can tell you something about how LLMs work you are definitely in nerd territory 😁 And I think I agree with you.

LLMs don't remember anything, they just model language. Systems like ChatGPT have other memory components though. LLMs will be able to produce good answers on how LLMs work though, since that is public info that would be part of the training data. ChatGPT will also use results from Google these days