See ... there you go. You re-posted a news article, without adding hyperbole. That's exactly how to spread information without the vitriol. I knew we could do it!

I often find myself wanting the blunt conversation that starts out "I think you're wrong, and here's why ...." before remembering how often so many people feel personally attacked by the idea that you think they're wrong. 🤷‍♀️

Ah ... misread your 'or' (porfolio) ... was focused on that. Apologies.

Activate against their disinformation and bad ideas, but don't stoop to hyperbole like 'traitors' and 'out of Canada'. They're mistaken, and often dumb, but dehumanize/excluding isn't a good approach.

How are they best when students are using AI, rather than internalized understanding to generate the product(s)?