Smilesalot Scott Overby
@smilesalot47.bsky.social
Early California and American Historian, song-writer, musician, devotee, organic gardener, handyman, educator. Search "Smilesalot" to stream love songs on most platforms in a Hippie-Hop Warriors of Light Rainbow Kitchen Style.
"migrants are trafficking Am. Eagle jeans"
GOP wants to charge people convicted of petty-theft or drug possessions with treatment-mandated felony, a choice between behavioral treatment or up to three years in jail or prison.
->deny treatment
=hard time for small crimes
step back to "War on Drugs"
GOP wants to charge people convicted of petty-theft or drug possessions with treatment-mandated felony, a choice between behavioral treatment or up to three years in jail or prison.
->deny treatment
=hard time for small crimes
step back to "War on Drugs"
December 17, 2025 at 5:26 PM
"migrants are trafficking Am. Eagle jeans"
GOP wants to charge people convicted of petty-theft or drug possessions with treatment-mandated felony, a choice between behavioral treatment or up to three years in jail or prison.
->deny treatment
=hard time for small crimes
step back to "War on Drugs"
GOP wants to charge people convicted of petty-theft or drug possessions with treatment-mandated felony, a choice between behavioral treatment or up to three years in jail or prison.
->deny treatment
=hard time for small crimes
step back to "War on Drugs"
["FCC takes direction from Trump and is not independent. they are proud of the "Kimmel" censorship as a standard. they work for Sinclair, NextStarr and Fox News. they will use coercion to censor news that do not compliment Trump. they will shut down national coverage pushing local news."] -FCC
December 17, 2025 at 5:13 PM
["FCC takes direction from Trump and is not independent. they are proud of the "Kimmel" censorship as a standard. they work for Sinclair, NextStarr and Fox News. they will use coercion to censor news that do not compliment Trump. they will shut down national coverage pushing local news."] -FCC
Nat. Republican Senatorial Committee v. FEC regarding limits on coordinated campaign spending with candidates.
JD Vance and GOP to....
-->"just bankroll their campaigns so that they don't need to actually raise money from voters...+ endless TV ads in 2026 election"
-Elias Law Group Jackie Lopez
JD Vance and GOP to....
-->"just bankroll their campaigns so that they don't need to actually raise money from voters...+ endless TV ads in 2026 election"
-Elias Law Group Jackie Lopez
December 9, 2025 at 7:45 PM
Nat. Republican Senatorial Committee v. FEC regarding limits on coordinated campaign spending with candidates.
JD Vance and GOP to....
-->"just bankroll their campaigns so that they don't need to actually raise money from voters...+ endless TV ads in 2026 election"
-Elias Law Group Jackie Lopez
JD Vance and GOP to....
-->"just bankroll their campaigns so that they don't need to actually raise money from voters...+ endless TV ads in 2026 election"
-Elias Law Group Jackie Lopez
MARC ELIAS: said honestly,
"giving a million dollars when the base limit is $3,500... The only thing that is preventing..[corruption]..is the coordinated party spending [expenditure limits]. If you take that off, then frankly, I'm not sure other than the bribery law, I don't think anything's left.
"giving a million dollars when the base limit is $3,500... The only thing that is preventing..[corruption]..is the coordinated party spending [expenditure limits]. If you take that off, then frankly, I'm not sure other than the bribery law, I don't think anything's left.
December 9, 2025 at 6:57 PM
MARC ELIAS: said honestly,
"giving a million dollars when the base limit is $3,500... The only thing that is preventing..[corruption]..is the coordinated party spending [expenditure limits]. If you take that off, then frankly, I'm not sure other than the bribery law, I don't think anything's left.
"giving a million dollars when the base limit is $3,500... The only thing that is preventing..[corruption]..is the coordinated party spending [expenditure limits]. If you take that off, then frankly, I'm not sure other than the bribery law, I don't think anything's left.
SCOTUS: today on 2011 Citizens United
"our decision was to level that playing field field"-J.Roberts
The 2 players:
corporations that control all of the national media (journalists)
& other corporations like Citizens United. (R. partisan hacks)
"our decision was to level that playing field field"-J.Roberts
The 2 players:
corporations that control all of the national media (journalists)
& other corporations like Citizens United. (R. partisan hacks)
December 9, 2025 at 6:45 PM
SCOTUS: today on 2011 Citizens United
"our decision was to level that playing field field"-J.Roberts
The 2 players:
corporations that control all of the national media (journalists)
& other corporations like Citizens United. (R. partisan hacks)
"our decision was to level that playing field field"-J.Roberts
The 2 players:
corporations that control all of the national media (journalists)
& other corporations like Citizens United. (R. partisan hacks)
I can't go to a Hippie Party and not get an ear-full from folks that whole heartedly believe the foreign trolls.
I told them:
-->"the R in Rippie stands for Republican or Russia"
(It's worse then going yuppie)
I told them:
-->"the R in Rippie stands for Republican or Russia"
(It's worse then going yuppie)
November 23, 2025 at 4:59 PM
I can't go to a Hippie Party and not get an ear-full from folks that whole heartedly believe the foreign trolls.
I told them:
-->"the R in Rippie stands for Republican or Russia"
(It's worse then going yuppie)
I told them:
-->"the R in Rippie stands for Republican or Russia"
(It's worse then going yuppie)
The best legal review of SCOTUS suggest the Justice's new book is...
"an effort to burnish (polish with no wax) an authoritarian regime that is being enabled by a regime-friendly Supreme Court."
"an effort to burnish (polish with no wax) an authoritarian regime that is being enabled by a regime-friendly Supreme Court."
November 23, 2025 at 4:36 PM
The best legal review of SCOTUS suggest the Justice's new book is...
"an effort to burnish (polish with no wax) an authoritarian regime that is being enabled by a regime-friendly Supreme Court."
"an effort to burnish (polish with no wax) an authoritarian regime that is being enabled by a regime-friendly Supreme Court."
Trump has lost the battle.
Republican people have turned against MAGA over the Epstein under-age sex scandal cover-up and it snowballed from there...
Republican people have turned against MAGA over the Epstein under-age sex scandal cover-up and it snowballed from there...
November 23, 2025 at 3:43 PM
Trump has lost the battle.
Republican people have turned against MAGA over the Epstein under-age sex scandal cover-up and it snowballed from there...
Republican people have turned against MAGA over the Epstein under-age sex scandal cover-up and it snowballed from there...
It is a threat to us ALL. not a legal analysis
"Encouraging the military not to obey unlawful orders is not an agreement under the seditious conspiracy statute,” Carlton Larson, a constitutional law scholar with University of California-Davis, told Politifact.
"Encouraging the military not to obey unlawful orders is not an agreement under the seditious conspiracy statute,” Carlton Larson, a constitutional law scholar with University of California-Davis, told Politifact.
November 23, 2025 at 3:11 PM
It is a threat to us ALL. not a legal analysis
"Encouraging the military not to obey unlawful orders is not an agreement under the seditious conspiracy statute,” Carlton Larson, a constitutional law scholar with University of California-Davis, told Politifact.
"Encouraging the military not to obey unlawful orders is not an agreement under the seditious conspiracy statute,” Carlton Larson, a constitutional law scholar with University of California-Davis, told Politifact.
This is a president Trump death threat double down & an open call for vigilante violence against the 6 Democratic ex-military lawmakers that extends to un-favorable media outlets. The sedition he speaks of is the US military oath that was repeated publicly.
Tomorrow it will be...
Tomorrow it will be...
November 23, 2025 at 2:56 PM
This is a president Trump death threat double down & an open call for vigilante violence against the 6 Democratic ex-military lawmakers that extends to un-favorable media outlets. The sedition he speaks of is the US military oath that was repeated publicly.
Tomorrow it will be...
Tomorrow it will be...
The 6 Democratic lawmakers that are targeted by the President are aware of the largest US military roll out since the Cuban missile crisis which is said to be based on "regime change"
November 21, 2025 at 5:59 PM
The 6 Democratic lawmakers that are targeted by the President are aware of the largest US military roll out since the Cuban missile crisis which is said to be based on "regime change"
MAGA has split - fractured by too many grifts
Senate Republicans stands by paying themselves an extra $10 million. While ALL House Reps said it was illegal.
Senate Republicans stands by paying themselves an extra $10 million. While ALL House Reps said it was illegal.
November 21, 2025 at 5:18 PM
MAGA has split - fractured by too many grifts
Senate Republicans stands by paying themselves an extra $10 million. While ALL House Reps said it was illegal.
Senate Republicans stands by paying themselves an extra $10 million. While ALL House Reps said it was illegal.
Journalist Jamal Khashoggi was a Virginia resident with political asylum. MBS ordered the death and Trump "saved his ass"(per Bob Woodward). "Things Happen".... for a price
November 21, 2025 at 4:58 PM
Journalist Jamal Khashoggi was a Virginia resident with political asylum. MBS ordered the death and Trump "saved his ass"(per Bob Woodward). "Things Happen".... for a price
Republican Sen. Rand Paul
Sen. Thom Tillis
Sen. Lindsey Graham
Sen. Susan Collins
Sen. John Thune
Sen. Tim Sheehy
Every other Republican law-maker endorses Trump's vigilante death threat b/c....?????
Sen. Thom Tillis
Sen. Lindsey Graham
Sen. Susan Collins
Sen. John Thune
Sen. Tim Sheehy
Every other Republican law-maker endorses Trump's vigilante death threat b/c....?????
November 21, 2025 at 4:04 PM
Republican Sen. Rand Paul
Sen. Thom Tillis
Sen. Lindsey Graham
Sen. Susan Collins
Sen. John Thune
Sen. Tim Sheehy
Every other Republican law-maker endorses Trump's vigilante death threat b/c....?????
Sen. Thom Tillis
Sen. Lindsey Graham
Sen. Susan Collins
Sen. John Thune
Sen. Tim Sheehy
Every other Republican law-maker endorses Trump's vigilante death threat b/c....?????
2/2 on why DN! has failed environmentalist:
CA GDP increased 81% pollution down 21%
100% clean electricity for part of everyday in 2024
2/3 clean energy in 2023
CA on track for 2045 to reach 100% clean electricity
@COP30 CA signed environmental contracts with Chile, Brazil, Nigeria and Colombia
CA GDP increased 81% pollution down 21%
100% clean electricity for part of everyday in 2024
2/3 clean energy in 2023
CA on track for 2045 to reach 100% clean electricity
@COP30 CA signed environmental contracts with Chile, Brazil, Nigeria and Colombia
November 21, 2025 at 3:41 PM
2/2 on why DN! has failed environmentalist:
CA GDP increased 81% pollution down 21%
100% clean electricity for part of everyday in 2024
2/3 clean energy in 2023
CA on track for 2045 to reach 100% clean electricity
@COP30 CA signed environmental contracts with Chile, Brazil, Nigeria and Colombia
CA GDP increased 81% pollution down 21%
100% clean electricity for part of everyday in 2024
2/3 clean energy in 2023
CA on track for 2045 to reach 100% clean electricity
@COP30 CA signed environmental contracts with Chile, Brazil, Nigeria and Colombia
Democracy Now! SUCKS
2 Weeks of climate doom scrolling at COP30 with one mention of CA actualization of Climate policy that leads to -0- emissions.
"So, you know, Gavin Newsom, for example, had a very prominent role here in the first couple of days." -DN!
1/2
2 Weeks of climate doom scrolling at COP30 with one mention of CA actualization of Climate policy that leads to -0- emissions.
"So, you know, Gavin Newsom, for example, had a very prominent role here in the first couple of days." -DN!
1/2
November 21, 2025 at 3:33 PM
Democracy Now! SUCKS
2 Weeks of climate doom scrolling at COP30 with one mention of CA actualization of Climate policy that leads to -0- emissions.
"So, you know, Gavin Newsom, for example, had a very prominent role here in the first couple of days." -DN!
1/2
2 Weeks of climate doom scrolling at COP30 with one mention of CA actualization of Climate policy that leads to -0- emissions.
"So, you know, Gavin Newsom, for example, had a very prominent role here in the first couple of days." -DN!
1/2
100% no legal representation
70% of detained folks have no lawyer
25% receive a trump appointed lawyer
5% that have a lawyer, prohibited to see client
*Children receive no medical attention*
70% of detained folks have no lawyer
25% receive a trump appointed lawyer
5% that have a lawyer, prohibited to see client
*Children receive no medical attention*
November 19, 2025 at 7:51 PM
100% no legal representation
70% of detained folks have no lawyer
25% receive a trump appointed lawyer
5% that have a lawyer, prohibited to see client
*Children receive no medical attention*
70% of detained folks have no lawyer
25% receive a trump appointed lawyer
5% that have a lawyer, prohibited to see client
*Children receive no medical attention*
"Sudan wasn't in my chart, but if MBS wants me to get involved i will help him in Sudan. I could probably fix it with a tariff, like I've settle 8 other wars."
November 19, 2025 at 6:05 PM
"Sudan wasn't in my chart, but if MBS wants me to get involved i will help him in Sudan. I could probably fix it with a tariff, like I've settle 8 other wars."
"Saudi Arabia has no liberals, no progressives, not even a word for that."
"Woke is illegal in the US."
"Woke is illegal in the US."
November 19, 2025 at 5:57 PM
"Saudi Arabia has no liberals, no progressives, not even a word for that."
"Woke is illegal in the US."
"Woke is illegal in the US."
Apple will be able to not pay 100's of Billions in taxes.
This is the biggest tax break in US history
-------------------de-regulation in US history
-------------------oil, N.Gas, & coal boom in US history
windmills are bankrupting us
This is the biggest tax break in US history
-------------------de-regulation in US history
-------------------oil, N.Gas, & coal boom in US history
windmills are bankrupting us
November 19, 2025 at 5:52 PM
Apple will be able to not pay 100's of Billions in taxes.
This is the biggest tax break in US history
-------------------de-regulation in US history
-------------------oil, N.Gas, & coal boom in US history
windmills are bankrupting us
This is the biggest tax break in US history
-------------------de-regulation in US history
-------------------oil, N.Gas, & coal boom in US history
windmills are bankrupting us
"I'm bringing in the Saudi's to manufacture micro-chips, Americans don't know what a computer chip looks like."
November 19, 2025 at 5:35 PM
"I'm bringing in the Saudi's to manufacture micro-chips, Americans don't know what a computer chip looks like."
SANDERS: Do you think All Americans should have Healthcare?
DEMS: yes, universal care.
MAGA: yes, if they could afford it (that's why we are doubling or tripling the price.)
DEMS: yes, universal care.
MAGA: yes, if they could afford it (that's why we are doubling or tripling the price.)
November 19, 2025 at 5:31 PM
SANDERS: Do you think All Americans should have Healthcare?
DEMS: yes, universal care.
MAGA: yes, if they could afford it (that's why we are doubling or tripling the price.)
DEMS: yes, universal care.
MAGA: yes, if they could afford it (that's why we are doubling or tripling the price.)
Access to quality care Matters!!
DEMS: Does taking $1 trillion out of health care help American's health needs?
MAGA: yes
DEMS: Should insurance companies sell junk plans?
-->(pay big $$ but get very limited coverage)
MAGA: No
DEMS: Why did Trump brought them back?
DEMS: Does taking $1 trillion out of health care help American's health needs?
MAGA: yes
DEMS: Should insurance companies sell junk plans?
-->(pay big $$ but get very limited coverage)
MAGA: No
DEMS: Why did Trump brought them back?
November 19, 2025 at 5:17 PM
Access to quality care Matters!!
DEMS: Does taking $1 trillion out of health care help American's health needs?
MAGA: yes
DEMS: Should insurance companies sell junk plans?
-->(pay big $$ but get very limited coverage)
MAGA: No
DEMS: Why did Trump brought them back?
DEMS: Does taking $1 trillion out of health care help American's health needs?
MAGA: yes
DEMS: Should insurance companies sell junk plans?
-->(pay big $$ but get very limited coverage)
MAGA: No
DEMS: Why did Trump brought them back?
["$27,000 for a family of four = Healthcare costs
-->That's paying double in 2026.
a 60 year old couple will pay +24,000 in 2026.
*Tariffs have a large factor in the price hike
Anti-Abortion ideology is why Americans won't get a tax break
Trump pays Argentina 2x the $ needed for American Health"]
-->That's paying double in 2026.
a 60 year old couple will pay +24,000 in 2026.
*Tariffs have a large factor in the price hike
Anti-Abortion ideology is why Americans won't get a tax break
Trump pays Argentina 2x the $ needed for American Health"]
November 19, 2025 at 5:08 PM
["$27,000 for a family of four = Healthcare costs
-->That's paying double in 2026.
a 60 year old couple will pay +24,000 in 2026.
*Tariffs have a large factor in the price hike
Anti-Abortion ideology is why Americans won't get a tax break
Trump pays Argentina 2x the $ needed for American Health"]
-->That's paying double in 2026.
a 60 year old couple will pay +24,000 in 2026.
*Tariffs have a large factor in the price hike
Anti-Abortion ideology is why Americans won't get a tax break
Trump pays Argentina 2x the $ needed for American Health"]
Is it odd that MAGA lawmakers are pushing to end healthcare for Americans based on...
MAGA wants NO women's health care
& if we do end ACA (ObamaCare) w MAGA proposed $2,000 per US person.
the 1 time pay out would last 1 month for most folks and no health care would be available beyond that payment
MAGA wants NO women's health care
& if we do end ACA (ObamaCare) w MAGA proposed $2,000 per US person.
the 1 time pay out would last 1 month for most folks and no health care would be available beyond that payment
November 19, 2025 at 4:45 PM
Is it odd that MAGA lawmakers are pushing to end healthcare for Americans based on...
MAGA wants NO women's health care
& if we do end ACA (ObamaCare) w MAGA proposed $2,000 per US person.
the 1 time pay out would last 1 month for most folks and no health care would be available beyond that payment
MAGA wants NO women's health care
& if we do end ACA (ObamaCare) w MAGA proposed $2,000 per US person.
the 1 time pay out would last 1 month for most folks and no health care would be available beyond that payment