Oma (Girlfriend of one of the founders of Antifa)
banner
socaloma.bsky.social
Oma (Girlfriend of one of the founders of Antifa)
@socaloma.bsky.social
Lover of science, nature, books, coffee, and sports. I live in the California Floristic Province, where I tend to native plants & plot the resistance

"Illegitimi non carborundum."
Meanwhile, Tom Cotton thinks it's okay to summarily execute anyone based on mere speculation they may still attempt to smuggle some undetermined amount of drugs to the United States?
December 4, 2025 at 8:32 PM
Who's to stop him, though?
December 4, 2025 at 8:29 PM
So Tom Cotton thinks it's "righteous" to summarily execute anyone based on mere speculation they may attempt to smuggle an undetermined amount of drugs to the United States?
December 4, 2025 at 7:55 PM
Meanwhile,Tom Cotton thinks it's okay to summarily execute anyone based on mere speculation they may attempt to smuggle an undetermined amount of drugs to the United States?
December 4, 2025 at 7:49 PM
Meanwhile, Tom Cotton thinks it's okay to summarily execute anyone based on mere speculation they may attempt to smuggle an undetermined amount of drugs to the United States?
December 4, 2025 at 7:47 PM
Exactly! Even if he saw what he thinks he saw, and his fantasy about their intentions were correct, how does that justify summarily executing them?
December 4, 2025 at 7:42 PM
So Tom Cotton thinks it's okay to summarily execute anyone based on mere speculation they may attempt to smuggle an undetermined amount of drugs to the United States?
December 4, 2025 at 7:40 PM
So Tom Cotton thinks it's okay to summarily execute anyone based on mere speculation they may attempt to smuggle an undetermined amount of drugs to the United States?
December 4, 2025 at 7:39 PM
So Tom Cotton thinks it's okay to summarily execute anyone based on mere speculation they may attempt to smuggle an undetermined amount of drugs to the United States?
December 4, 2025 at 7:38 PM
If the boat was flipped over, how could Cotton tell it was "loaded with drugs"? And what made him think the shipwrecked civilians were trying to get the charred and soaked remains of those drugs to the United States? And, even so, why would that justify their murder, rather than their apprehension?
December 4, 2025 at 7:00 PM
Righteous???? How does he sleep at night, with a moral compass that warped?
December 4, 2025 at 6:57 PM
Just when I thought GOP couldn't sink any lower. If that doesn't disturb them, nothing ever will.
December 4, 2025 at 6:28 PM
WTAF? So that's how he justified killing them????
December 4, 2025 at 6:24 PM
We're doomed. Visual evidence of premeditated murder, of civilians clinging to the wreckage of a burning boat that's no longer posing a conceivable threat to our country, --and it's "rigtheous" in his view?
December 4, 2025 at 6:19 PM
That argument didn't work so well for commander Heinz Eck, who torpedoed a Greek ship in 1944 and then ordered the killing of survivors of the ship who clung to rafts. Eck was sentenced to death for killing the helpless survivors in clear violation of international law.
December 4, 2025 at 4:38 PM
Yes! In 1944, German commander Heinz Eck, torpedoed a Greek ship, which was a legitimate military target. Therafter, Eck ordered the killing of the survivors of the ship who clung to rafts. Eck was sentenced to death for killing the helpless survivors in clear violation of international law.
December 4, 2025 at 4:34 PM
Exactly! In 1944, German commander Heinz Eck, torpedoed a Greek ship, which was a legitimate military target. Therafter, Eck ordered the killing of the survivors of the ship who clung to rafts. Eck was sentenced to death for killing the helpless survivors in clear violation of international law.
December 4, 2025 at 4:33 PM
Holsey is a true hero and patriot.
December 4, 2025 at 4:28 AM
Didn't work out so well for German commander Heinz Eck, who ordered the killing of the survivors of a ship he torpedoed in 1944 who clung to rafts and the ship's wreckage. Eck was sentenced to death for killing the helpless survivors in clear violation of international law.
December 4, 2025 at 4:20 AM
Agreed. The vessel was engulfed in flames and heavily damaged, as shown in the video of the first strike. The notion that a second strike was necessary to elminate the "threat" of the burning wreckage is absurd.
December 4, 2025 at 4:03 AM