Sorry - I pasted this over from the "other" place and didn't update my colleagues addresses for here. They are @beargoldstein and @shannon47burns.bsky.social

Across the dataset we saw that our CRQA measures accounted for significant variance in behavioral and self-report measures, while ISC and WTC did not

Here is the paper: www.frontiersin.org/articles/10....

I appreciate the kind words. I think that will be someone else's book. My next serious book will be about consciousness.

2023 version

Integrating with other NCC models (Fig 2): RPT handles unstructured sensory experience → CEEing stitches them into coherence pre-reflective experiences → GNWT/HOT broadcast select bits for reflection & report. 8/8

That pattern fits my CEEing model: gestalt cortex fuses raw input with memories, motives & expectations, yielding coherent effortless experiences that feel “given,” not constructed—like invisible AR glasses painting meaning onto the world. 7/8

Meta-analysis of differential synchrony studies (Fig 1) highlights Gestalt cortex & posterior medial cortex, where sensory inputs meet personal context. 6/8

Neural synchrony measures how two brains’ signals rise/fall together while they watch the same story. Regular synchrony shows shared experience; differential synchrony zooms in on where groups diverge, isolating their unique p-interpretations. 5/8