@sol73omega.bsky.social
It is indicative that anonymous you makes public accusations about David Myatt. Meanwhile do continue to make such accusations about Myatt or provide evidential proof| re your allegations or STFU. For the rational among us, this may be of some help egnatiusseverin.wordpress.com/2026/01/31/i...
Interesting And Indicative
What is both interesting and indicative is how dehumanizing many of the allegations about David Myatt are. Such as the allegation that his post-2012 writings are deceptive {1} and that therefore (a…
egnatiusseverin.wordpress.com
January 31, 2026 at 3:33 PM
It is indicative that anonymous you makes public accusations about David Myatt. Meanwhile do continue to make such accusations about Myatt or provide evidential proof| re your allegations or STFU. For the rational among us, this may be of some help egnatiusseverin.wordpress.com/2026/01/31/i...
He said it was a neo-Nazi honey-trap, that's all. Do you dispute that? If so, what is your probative evidence? This is becoming (i) a dialogue between you parroting the accusations of others about Myatt, and (ii) accepting or not what Myatt has said on his word of honour. It's really that simple.
January 31, 2026 at 11:26 AM
He said it was a neo-Nazi honey-trap, that's all. Do you dispute that? If so, what is your probative evidence? This is becoming (i) a dialogue between you parroting the accusations of others about Myatt, and (ii) accepting or not what Myatt has said on his word of honour. It's really that simple.
Myatt said that the journalist in that 1974 interview did not report what he had said - so it's down to Myatt's word on his honour against what a journalist reported. Do you believe all journalists always tell the truth? Isn't Myatt's 1990s challenge to two journalists to a duel indicative?
January 31, 2026 at 11:19 AM
Myatt said that the journalist in that 1974 interview did not report what he had said - so it's down to Myatt's word on his honour against what a journalist reported. Do you believe all journalists always tell the truth? Isn't Myatt's 1990s challenge to two journalists to a duel indicative?
As I said in another reply, he never mentioned the O9A. As for him "espousing its ideology" what evidential proof do you have other than the unproven claim that he was Anton Long?
January 31, 2026 at 11:02 AM
As I said in another reply, he never mentioned the O9A. As for him "espousing its ideology" what evidential proof do you have other than the unproven claim that he was Anton Long?
What probative evidence? Myatt in his statements re his brief involvements with the Occult as honey-traps never AFAIK mentioned the later O9A. Like I said, you either believe him - given on his word of honour - or you believe the unproven allegations of others. It's a simple choice.
January 31, 2026 at 10:58 AM
What probative evidence? Myatt in his statements re his brief involvements with the Occult as honey-traps never AFAIK mentioned the later O9A. Like I said, you either believe him - given on his word of honour - or you believe the unproven allegations of others. It's a simple choice.
Do please get your facts right. Myatt has said that his short-term involvement withe the Occult was for the sole purpose of aiding his then Neo-nazi agenda - as a honey trap. As I've said, you can either believe that or not. If not, where is your probative evidence that contradicts his statement?
January 31, 2026 at 10:50 AM
Do please get your facts right. Myatt has said that his short-term involvement withe the Occult was for the sole purpose of aiding his then Neo-nazi agenda - as a honey trap. As I've said, you can either believe that or not. If not, where is your probative evidence that contradicts his statement?
A "long and very personal story..." Since you have here anonymously publicly lambasted David Myatt are you willing to share that "long and very personal story" or not?
January 31, 2026 at 10:41 AM
A "long and very personal story..." Since you have here anonymously publicly lambasted David Myatt are you willing to share that "long and very personal story" or not?
I have to ask: why do you seem so intent on the question of David Myatt?
January 31, 2026 at 3:38 AM
I have to ask: why do you seem so intent on the question of David Myatt?
You didn’t answer the questions I asked re Myatt's reply in various sources but instead just made more accusations. Par for the course as they say. Do you or don't you accept that Myatt's reply to the allegations is by him? If not, what evidential proof do you have?
January 31, 2026 at 3:34 AM
You didn’t answer the questions I asked re Myatt's reply in various sources but instead just made more accusations. Par for the course as they say. Do you or don't you accept that Myatt's reply to the allegations is by him? If not, what evidential proof do you have?
Desperation? Will you now claim that his wordpress blog - where the item can be found - is not his; that his dot info website (2012-2024, archive on that blog) was not his; that the seven interviews in where he mentions that item were not with him? Conspiracy theory comes to mind...
January 30, 2026 at 4:36 PM
Desperation? Will you now claim that his wordpress blog - where the item can be found - is not his; that his dot info website (2012-2024, archive on that blog) was not his; that the seven interviews in where he mentions that item were not with him? Conspiracy theory comes to mind...
Seems you don't understand 'hearsay' in legal terms. Since Myatt is still alive he could be cross-examined in a Court of Law re that text. That he chose to challenge two journalists to a duel for spreading lies about him & they cowardly refused is enough for the few who still believe in honour.
January 30, 2026 at 11:00 AM
Seems you don't understand 'hearsay' in legal terms. Since Myatt is still alive he could be cross-examined in a Court of Law re that text. That he chose to challenge two journalists to a duel for spreading lies about him & they cowardly refused is enough for the few who still believe in honour.
As for Myatt existing, there is ample probative evidence, like his various appearances in Courts of Law; his terms of imprisonment; his arrest in 1998 by 'Special Branch' police office based at Scotland Yard. Blah blah blah...
January 30, 2026 at 7:19 AM
As for Myatt existing, there is ample probative evidence, like his various appearances in Courts of Law; his terms of imprisonment; his arrest in 1998 by 'Special Branch' police office based at Scotland Yard. Blah blah blah...
In legal terms both are hearsay, not probative evidence. David Myatt addressed that Evening Post newspaper article in his 2013 "A Matter of Honour". The 'Heretic' was a zine containing one person's opinion. See also "A 1974 Newspaper Article" in archive.org/download/urb...
January 30, 2026 at 7:15 AM
In legal terms both are hearsay, not probative evidence. David Myatt addressed that Evening Post newspaper article in his 2013 "A Matter of Honour". The 'Heretic' was a zine containing one person's opinion. See also "A 1974 Newspaper Article" in archive.org/download/urb...
What newspaper article, what magazine? That you refuse to cite them is interesting and indicative. BTW, a newspaper article and a magazine article in legal terms are hearsay, and thus not probative evidence.
January 30, 2026 at 1:27 AM
What newspaper article, what magazine? That you refuse to cite them is interesting and indicative. BTW, a newspaper article and a magazine article in legal terms are hearsay, and thus not probative evidence.
What print sources? Yet again you provide no URL's, no names, no accessible references.
January 29, 2026 at 11:29 AM
What print sources? Yet again you provide no URL's, no names, no accessible references.
You stated that "two people decades apart independently of each other" wrote about David Myatt and confirmed some stuff yet you decline to cite their work in detail so that others can check it?
January 29, 2026 at 5:52 AM
You stated that "two people decades apart independently of each other" wrote about David Myatt and confirmed some stuff yet you decline to cite their work in detail so that others can check it?
Unless the accounts are subject to detailed scrutiny and fact checked then they are not evidence. So perhaps you could supply URL's so that can be done.
January 28, 2026 at 10:55 AM
Unless the accounts are subject to detailed scrutiny and fact checked then they are not evidence. So perhaps you could supply URL's so that can be done.
Par for the course.
January 28, 2026 at 10:51 AM
Par for the course.
Obviously you have no evidence for your claims re Myatt sockpuppets or you would have posted it. Instead, in a classic example of the große Lüge technique you just repeat the allegation. As clinical psychologist Dr. Ramani Durvasula is reported to have said:
January 28, 2026 at 10:50 AM
Obviously you have no evidence for your claims re Myatt sockpuppets or you would have posted it. Instead, in a classic example of the große Lüge technique you just repeat the allegation. As clinical psychologist Dr. Ramani Durvasula is reported to have said:
Intellectually independent? Perhaps you should read items such as academic one the O9A by Daveed Gartenstein-Ross & Emelie Chace-Donahue which does not focus on the alleged identity of Anton Long? Or sinisterstudies.substack.com/p/anton-long...
Anton Long as Hyperstition, Part I of II
Identity Dissolution, Inhuman Agency, and Occult Persona-Engineering in the Order of Nine Angles
sinisterstudies.substack.com
January 27, 2026 at 4:30 PM
Intellectually independent? Perhaps you should read items such as academic one the O9A by Daveed Gartenstein-Ross & Emelie Chace-Donahue which does not focus on the alleged identity of Anton Long? Or sinisterstudies.substack.com/p/anton-long...
Yet another reasonable, well argued, reply from you... In complete contrast to all the finger pointing and allegations about David Myatt here and elsewhere, here's a balanced academic article - sinisterstudies.substack.com/p/hermes-tri...
Hermes Trismegistus Reloaded
David Myatt’s Corpus Hermeticum and the Making of a Pagan Semantic Field
sinisterstudies.substack.com
January 27, 2026 at 4:22 PM
Yet another reasonable, well argued, reply from you... In complete contrast to all the finger pointing and allegations about David Myatt here and elsewhere, here's a balanced academic article - sinisterstudies.substack.com/p/hermes-tri...
Why do you keep making allegations about burner accounts set up by David Myatt when you clearly refuse to provide evidence for the allegations?
January 27, 2026 at 4:20 PM
Why do you keep making allegations about burner accounts set up by David Myatt when you clearly refuse to provide evidence for the allegations?
It's not "inherently more truthful" and he has never said it is - it's just his side of the story. The fair thing to do is to hear both sides. Just saying "he's lying" is not evidential and he's never said he's "special", quite the opposite. You can believe him or what others say. Your choice.
January 26, 2026 at 9:20 PM
It's not "inherently more truthful" and he has never said it is - it's just his side of the story. The fair thing to do is to hear both sides. Just saying "he's lying" is not evidential and he's never said he's "special", quite the opposite. You can believe him or what others say. Your choice.