Discrimination.

The whole nation gets redress with the FCA and UKSC and @jabscotland.bsky.social allows this Sheriff to continue on the bench requiring a single household to subsidise the liabilities of a car finance company.

Diabolical.
@transparencyuk.bsky.social
@spotlightcorruption.org

Instead the disabled LIP is subjected to further SLAPPs and bureaucratic violence @jabscotland.bsky.social @ukparliament.parliament.uk @transparencyuk.bsky.social @publiclawproject.bsky.social
@spotlightcorruption.org @hrw.org @hrcscotland.bsky.social @broadcastscot.bsky.social

Is this justice?

Yet, here was the response @jabscotland.bsky.social

Is this the type of Sheriffs you believe truly provide justice for the public interest? Because it seems to me the game is very clearly rigged.

Imagine: the FCA and UKSC holds the fraudulent finance company liable. But your Sheriff doesn’t.

Here’s a motion that was submitted today about a financial company that admitted to mis-selling financial products and after the UKSC decision which will have national redress for consumers. The Sheriff found in favour of the fraudulent financial company + refused to overturn HIS wrongful decision.

Seen in local Sainsbury’s.

Original price: £40
Sale price: £12

That’s a 30% reduction.

And we know (I would hope), that they are still making a profit even with this 30% reduction.

Its beyond time we start asking: Is this really a fair price for this product?

Can confirm this trickles down to the microsphere. The macro and the micro are always connected, cyclical, and reproducing.

“As above, so below”; “As within, so without”; “What goes up must come down,” many euphemisms and still we find ourselves confounded.

At some point it becomes deliberate.

Just said it on Boxing Day, so “it's not just me, I'm what the culture feelin'.”