spenser-q.bsky.social
@spenser-q.bsky.social
I've had different nightmares in my life. Not having one of them last night doesn't mean I didn't have a different one.

Not for you?
November 29, 2024 at 7:47 PM
Also a life long Bears fan (now 53), and I have never seen anything like the complete situational incompetence shown by Eberflus. Nothing even close.

That's not to say I think they'll actually hire a good coach. There's hope for that, but even "less terrible" would be good.
November 29, 2024 at 6:00 PM
At last our long Chicago Bears nightmare is over.
November 29, 2024 at 5:26 PM
It's gotta be that they're afraid teams will game the system. Maybe something like watering the infield if you've got a ground ball pitcher, or maybe something more like: "oops, our boundary cam just went out unexpectedly, so the visiting team can't use it." Maybe other similar examples.
November 26, 2024 at 4:22 AM
Looks like some good-a** hummus, too.
November 19, 2024 at 11:06 PM
Earned you a follow.

Also: Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat?
November 19, 2024 at 11:03 PM
that random citizens are posting to YouTube?

It really goes back to the conspiracy-conspiracy mindset: I think "there's something suspicious" so "prove that I'm wrong that voter fraud happened."

No. Just no.
November 19, 2024 at 7:50 PM
allegedly-fraudulent votes tallied in places in which the Democratic party is in power and effectively controls all vote counting? If so, then what is the plausible explanation for why they would participate in the conspiracy -- or why they would somehow fail to recognize signs of vote fraud ...
November 19, 2024 at 7:48 PM
the fact that different states' voting systems are separate, and you'd have to account for how each separately was manipulated.

And you'd also have to run through other possible, but easily-recognized, difficulties with the vote-fraud hypothesis. For instance, were some of these ...
November 19, 2024 at 7:46 PM
Perhaps more importantly, this has all the hallmarks of conspiracy-theorizing: assert that something is "suspicious" and demand that the world "prove me wrong."

No. You come up with a plausible scenario, based on evidence, in which all of this could have occurred -- despite, for instance, ...
November 19, 2024 at 7:44 PM
No, it's junk -- disproven in this post. Short answer: there is no glut of "bullet ballots," just the appearance of one because of the typical, and totally normal, difference in the *rate* at which presidential and non-presidential ballots are counted. 1/2

www.dailykos.com/stories/2024...
Senate Election Results and the Search for "Bullet Ballots" -- Day 11
Before tackling the headline issue of this installment, the results for the Pennsylvania Senate race keep trickling in, and with ~25,000 ballots still left to count, Democratic Senator Bob Casey keeps...
www.dailykos.com
November 19, 2024 at 7:42 PM
When I saw that live I said, "I think that's the best tackle by a punter I've ever seen."

Now I know. Aussie.
November 17, 2024 at 2:41 PM
Yeah, this is dumb.

"Something stinks" is not an argument. It's not evidence. It's nothing at all except the kind of thing conspiracy theorists say to pretend something happened. And because "something stinks" needs no evidence, it can also never be disproven.

Really bad.
November 17, 2024 at 4:21 AM
Yes, more dogs, please. This is my boy, Cooper.
November 15, 2024 at 5:54 PM
If it's not staged, and Mike has actually been training seriously, then he will.
November 15, 2024 at 4:01 PM