Not for you?
Not for you?
That's not to say I think they'll actually hire a good coach. There's hope for that, but even "less terrible" would be good.
That's not to say I think they'll actually hire a good coach. There's hope for that, but even "less terrible" would be good.
Also: Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat?
Also: Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat?
It really goes back to the conspiracy-conspiracy mindset: I think "there's something suspicious" so "prove that I'm wrong that voter fraud happened."
No. Just no.
It really goes back to the conspiracy-conspiracy mindset: I think "there's something suspicious" so "prove that I'm wrong that voter fraud happened."
No. Just no.
And you'd also have to run through other possible, but easily-recognized, difficulties with the vote-fraud hypothesis. For instance, were some of these ...
And you'd also have to run through other possible, but easily-recognized, difficulties with the vote-fraud hypothesis. For instance, were some of these ...
No. You come up with a plausible scenario, based on evidence, in which all of this could have occurred -- despite, for instance, ...
No. You come up with a plausible scenario, based on evidence, in which all of this could have occurred -- despite, for instance, ...
www.dailykos.com/stories/2024...
www.dailykos.com/stories/2024...
Now I know. Aussie.
Now I know. Aussie.
"Something stinks" is not an argument. It's not evidence. It's nothing at all except the kind of thing conspiracy theorists say to pretend something happened. And because "something stinks" needs no evidence, it can also never be disproven.
Really bad.
"Something stinks" is not an argument. It's not evidence. It's nothing at all except the kind of thing conspiracy theorists say to pretend something happened. And because "something stinks" needs no evidence, it can also never be disproven.
Really bad.