Spideycloned
spideycloned.bsky.social
Spideycloned
@spideycloned.bsky.social
Occasional Speedrunner, wrestling enthusiast of all brands and know it all about TVs.
I mean cool, but will she wrestle? No? Then who cares.
December 6, 2025 at 9:05 PM
"Sorry, you've already been blessed. It'd be blasphemous for me to do it again."
December 1, 2025 at 8:04 PM
I'm saying it doesn't exist in the context that no one is stupid enough to offer a deal contingent on the person actively fucking over their current company. There isn't a single talent on any roster that would merit this. It'd also put contracts under a microscope, which again, no one wants.
November 30, 2025 at 2:27 PM
You just can't offer something under the guise of forcing them to break a contract or to perform in a way that it would hamper the other party as a condition for singing your contract.
November 30, 2025 at 2:25 PM
Right, which I made a follow up post to clarify.

We've seen numerous other articles hit the sheets for far less. "Oh they're talking to swerve while hes under contract, thats tampering". No, it's not. You can absolutely have a conversation and even offer something after their current shit ends.
November 30, 2025 at 2:24 PM
Contract tampering? For a tort claim to maybe be relevant, WWE would have to know he has a contract(they do), actively tell him to get out of it(they arent), and then actively fuck over aews business with him under his current contract(they arent).

More to it but those are the key points
November 30, 2025 at 2:20 PM
Now do it with maggots and holy lasers
November 1, 2025 at 7:05 PM
Yeah, the problem is when Trump does it we have no fucking idea if hes actually trying to be eloquent(lmfao hes not) or just going off on a random tangent because hes fucking deluded.

I've never heard a Mamdani line like that and didn't think the words weren't purposeful.
November 1, 2025 at 6:14 PM
Hard to get paid on engagement on bluesky where there isn't a formal payment mechanism.

That said they deleted their post, so even harder to get paid when you get owned.
October 31, 2025 at 9:15 PM
www.reuters.com
October 31, 2025 at 7:22 PM
Yeah, all it means is that they agreed to terms on the remainder of his contract/buyout clause.
October 31, 2025 at 6:10 PM
Even Kenvue, with the Trump admin specifically going TYLENOL CAUSES AUTISM hasn't dropped a lawsuit and they've had over a month.

Honestly it all feels like a grift. He makes fun of a company, his cronies buy on the dip and then make huge swathes of cash.
October 27, 2025 at 8:20 PM
Theres no fucking way. We've already seen how former CLOs would act in this space.

www.theverge.com/news/784312/...

Theres not a single org that would contemplate suing Trump unless it directly fucked with their bottom line.
Pokémon lawyers won’t sue DHS for that video, former legal head predicts
“Gotta Catch ‘Em All.”
www.theverge.com
October 27, 2025 at 8:18 PM
Right, this man who is on record as receiving 100% military disability which is roughly 48k a year and isn't considered taxable income so he actually makes the 48k on the 48k A normal person would have to make 57k a year to do that.

This isn't the person we make this claim on.
October 22, 2025 at 1:02 AM
"It didn't turn up in an internet search"

Sure Jan. Whatever you say.
October 21, 2025 at 10:17 PM
Even then, look at the framing.

"I was told this resembles a nazi symbol".

No you fucking moron, it's literally a nazi symbol. It doesn't resemble one. It is an actual 1:1 copy.

He still just doesn't fucking get it.
October 21, 2025 at 10:15 PM
Totally agree and don't think that post is a defense.

The thing was he was the one who put out the video, ironically. I do believe it comes out eventually in some way, shape or form but this was one of the biggest self owns I've seen a candidate do.
October 21, 2025 at 10:12 PM
Here's the thing.

He got grace.

The reddit comments, he had to defend. The racist comments about how black people don't tip, he had to come out and defend.

People gave him grace.

Sometimes you run out of it.

You definitely run out when you have a totenkopf on your fucking chest.
October 21, 2025 at 10:10 PM
He's only been a candidate and in the national spotlight for two months.

Honestly this is a pretty quick turnaround.
October 21, 2025 at 10:07 PM
Reposted by Spideycloned
Why is this a debate? Why is this an analysis? Why are we discussing his motivations or the reasoning behind why he has it or why he kept it? (These are all rhetorical questions.)

Nazi tattoo = you’re done.

It’s literally that simple. There’s no nuance or further conversation needed.
October 21, 2025 at 10:01 PM
That's the part that disqualifies him.

He let the controversy dictate his response. He could have scheduled to get it removed and told a story about how symbology is important and we all have to make sure we're careful.

Instead, he just went "My friends know I'm not a nazi".

Fuck him.
October 21, 2025 at 10:00 PM