Sergey Frolov🇺🇦
@spinespresso.bsky.social
1.2K followers 390 following 1.5K posts
Quantum Computing boffin, Condensed Matter Physics, Reproducibility. Professor of Experimental Physics, University of Pittsburgh Blog: https://espressospin.org/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@spinespresso Lab: http://frolovlab.org/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
spinespresso.bsky.social
3 years from when russia invaded Ukraine. When the USA told the leader of the free world President Zelensky to leave, and he replied "I don't need a ride. I need ammunition".

This is the first slide of every talk I gave in the last 3 years. This thread is about (quantum) science in Ukraine. 🧵
spinespresso.bsky.social
The prize is for the greatest benefit which can in principle be a negative value
spinespresso.bsky.social
Nobel prize is a corrupting influence on science. Unrelated to that, the three people who got it can be celebrated anytime.
I know Dale would have been raising a glass today.
spinespresso.bsky.social
-Hey Karl, is this a bullshit paper in Nature?

Analyzing....
spinespresso.bsky.social
Please please please call it Karl!
spinespresso.bsky.social
Did you fix the coffee machine ?
spinespresso.bsky.social
due to the complex valued nature of time, a small calibration error resulted in overlooking a time-phase shift of pi/4 accounting for fifteen years of imaginary time. the authors regret the lack of scientific rigor.
spinespresso.bsky.social
If you call in the next 30 minutes, we will throw in this chip - a billion dollar value!
spinespresso.bsky.social
like most fake claims, it only works when it is wrong
spinespresso.bsky.social
Only one explanation for this: the journal was traveling at near the speed of light
spinespresso.bsky.social
eye opening, i thought they go to get yelled at by the scientists
spinespresso.bsky.social
Well-well, an entire University exposed as a Minecraft simulation...
spinespresso.bsky.social
So grateful for Slack's trademark purplish-wine-stain color which helps me rapidly know that I am talking to PhDs and not to chatGPT
spinespresso.bsky.social
So there is no coffee in Canada yet America is the center of the Apocalypse? We have coffee...
spinespresso.bsky.social
Apparently Schoen who copied the same made up trace in two nature papers was asked which one was right and just picked one

Later 15 papers were retracted from nature and science
spinespresso.bsky.social
We, @vincentmourik.bsky.social and I, pointed out a pattern in 4 papers to Springer Nature. They split the complaint in separate parts then handled each paper separately with no regard for a pattern. Finding a pattern provides extra evidence.
Ignoring a pattern can be a way to diminish the problem.
spinespresso.bsky.social
If you are in Pittsburgh, join us on Thursday for the opening of Scientists in Exile

pi.tt/StandingFree...
spinespresso.bsky.social
We need to wait for it to come out in Nature before we jump to conclusions
spinespresso.bsky.social
In your experience, did any editor ever react to being presented with a pattern in more than one paper?
spinespresso.bsky.social
The boards of COPE are dominated by industry insiders. This combined with nominal oversight where they may consider an occasional complaint and maybe an editor takes that into account. Vent and dissipate the frustration. It is very convenient for publishers, they would not want to change anything.
spinespresso.bsky.social
anything in hunch and simplicity?
spinespresso.bsky.social
COPE is an industry interest group that provides cover to bad actors, i.e. publishers. It is not a toothless tiger it is a small part of a big monster.