Corporate IT already uses TLS MTiM via Zscaler and similar tools for safety. I wouldn't be surprised if this would come as a next step after VPN ban for public safety.
January 23, 2026 at 11:15 PM
Corporate IT already uses TLS MTiM via Zscaler and similar tools for safety. I wouldn't be surprised if this would come as a next step after VPN ban for public safety.
"will allow small teams to have a chance to compete with bigger companies" Are you sure that bigger companies would not just downsize? If you "don't write code anymore" than the company doesn't need so many engineers.
January 11, 2026 at 3:10 PM
"will allow small teams to have a chance to compete with bigger companies" Are you sure that bigger companies would not just downsize? If you "don't write code anymore" than the company doesn't need so many engineers.
More like different kind of tokens. Think of a more advanced language, maybe the latent space based. But this would probably happen post AGI. So, we might not be interested in this topic when it happens.
November 23, 2025 at 2:14 PM
More like different kind of tokens. Think of a more advanced language, maybe the latent space based. But this would probably happen post AGI. So, we might not be interested in this topic when it happens.
Right now it's just a throttling mechanism. Everything has been paid by the investors. You have to wait until the bubble pops for it to become the meaningful value.
November 7, 2025 at 9:16 AM
Right now it's just a throttling mechanism. Everything has been paid by the investors. You have to wait until the bubble pops for it to become the meaningful value.
Yes, but these are relatively rare issues in millions of code-lines. Is it the most cost effective way to deal with those by pivoting the entire code structure? The answer might be similar to the one about FP. Of course, this might be just my perspective of a person working not in FAANG.
November 6, 2025 at 3:10 PM
Yes, but these are relatively rare issues in millions of code-lines. Is it the most cost effective way to deal with those by pivoting the entire code structure? The answer might be similar to the one about FP. Of course, this might be just my perspective of a person working not in FAANG.
I would say in the business apps world not many people would even understand if there is some problem. GC doesn't care. When a "user" would loose its connection to the root, the entire chain (user-comment-user) would be put into garbage. Weak references and other stuff are used extremely rarely.
November 6, 2025 at 2:44 PM
I would say in the business apps world not many people would even understand if there is some problem. GC doesn't care. When a "user" would loose its connection to the root, the entire chain (user-comment-user) would be put into garbage. Weak references and other stuff are used extremely rarely.
User has Comments. A comment has an Author. An author is a user. Linked lists are everywhere. Because of that you start using Arc and doing tons of excess memory operations. At least that's my current understanding as I just literally started with Rust.
November 6, 2025 at 2:33 PM
User has Comments. A comment has an Author. An author is a user. Linked lists are everywhere. Because of that you start using Arc and doing tons of excess memory operations. At least that's my current understanding as I just literally started with Rust.