In discussion with @theregreview.bsky.social, Matthew J. Sanders discusses his forthcoming SLR article on the “little-known but highly consequential” administrative-remand rule. Sanders will present his work as a part of SLR's 2026 Admin Law Symposium. www.theregreview.org/2025/09/21/s...

SLRO will open for submissions on our website and Scholastica on Monday, September 15, at 5:00 PM PT. Please see our website for more information. We look forward to reviewing submissions on a rolling basis! review.law.stanford.edu/submissions/...

8/8 In our final Essay, Samuel Bray and James Pfander discuss universal injunctions. In this adversarial collaboration they explain where equitable tradition guides them to agree and where sharp differences remain. www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/remed...

7/8 What limits are there to the President’s removal power? In this adversarial collaboration, Aditya Bamzai and Peter Shane trace this debate from the First Congress and offer dueling views on what that says about the executive’s powers today. www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/the-r...

6/8 Sonia Mittal, a senior Jan. 6 prosecutor, details firings and demotions inside DOJ. She warns these actions reflect an effort to “capture the referees,” a playbook for authoritarian control through politicized law enforcement. www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/execu...

1/8 ‪Diego Zambrano‬ observes that while other democracies rally around “the rule of law,” Americans invoke “due process.” He argues the distinction is more than just words and may leave Americans unprepared to spot and resist democratic backsliding.
www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/due-p...

5/8 Targeted by Trump’s executive orders, law firms face a collective action dilemma: risk resisting alone or capitulate. @nora-engstrom.bsky.social, Jonah Gelbach & David Marcus detail how the profession can confront executive overreach as a class. www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/how-a...

4/8 Can courts review a president’s retaliatory revocation of a security clearance? Shreeya Singh (SLS ‘27) argues Supreme Court precedent supports review, but a recent ruling may shield such actions from scrutiny under the guise of national security. www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/natio...

3/8 Reviving Nixon-era arguments, Trump claimed power to block funds Congress had already approved. In this Essay, Zachary Price dismantles the constitutional and practical cases for presidential impoundment. www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/trump...

2/8 Bernadette Meyler argues courts should expand the “independent constitutional bar” test to federal funds granted to private entities. Otherwise, government suppression of free speech by proxy of private entities may escape accountability. www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/lever...

SLR Online Special Symposium Essays are now available on our website! We have 8 Essays about executive actions, constitutional boundaries, and the rule of law in Trump II. www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/

SLR’s summer submission cycle and our Scholastica portal open tomorrow, July 18, at 5:00 PM PT! We look forward to reviewing your submissions!

SLR’s summer submission cycle will open on Friday, July 18, at 5:00 PM PT. We will be accepting general submissions as well as submissions for our Symposium Issue—The APA at Eighty: What’s Next for Administrative Law? We look forward to reviewing submissions on a rolling basis!

Stanford Law Review Online is now accepting submissions for our Special Symposium through May 23. Please see the Online Essay Submissions page for more information and to submit your piece. We look forward to reviewing submissions on a rolling basis! review.law.stanford.edu/submissions/...

Manuscripts may be submitted from May 12 to May 23. Accepted essays will be published in Stanford Law Review Online.

We are excited to announce our Special Symposium in partnership with the Stanford Neukom Center for the Rule of Law: “100 Days of The Trump Administration: Constitutional Boundaries on Executive Power & the Rule of Law.” review.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/u...