Stefanie Haustein
@stefhaustein.scholcommlab.ca
Associate prof, School of Information Studies, University of Ottawa @uottawa.ca
Co-director, Scholarly Communications Lab #ScholCommLab #FirstGen
open science | bibliometrics | open access | research assessment | metascience
Co-director, Scholarly Communications Lab #ScholCommLab #FirstGen
open science | bibliometrics | open access | research assessment | metascience
Intense discussion with The Drain authors today about where to submit Part II.. And somehow @lariviev.bsky.social launched the idea of hockey jerseys?! Thanks for your service, ChatGPT. @danbrockington.bsky.social @hansonmark.bsky.social @stephenpinfield.bsky.social @aileenfyfe.bsky.social
December 16, 2025 at 4:30 PM
Intense discussion with The Drain authors today about where to submit Part II.. And somehow @lariviev.bsky.social launched the idea of hockey jerseys?! Thanks for your service, ChatGPT. @danbrockington.bsky.social @hansonmark.bsky.social @stephenpinfield.bsky.social @aileenfyfe.bsky.social
Excited to join @braccolaetitia.social.sciences.re.ap.brid.gy & team at Open Science Monitoring Inititative (OSMI) as steering board member. Looking forward to work w/ Cécile Coulibaly, Moumita Koley, @susannanykyri.bsky.social & @jeroenson.bsky.social
open-science-monitoring.org/meet-the-fiv...
open-science-monitoring.org/meet-the-fiv...
December 16, 2025 at 2:57 PM
Excited to join @braccolaetitia.social.sciences.re.ap.brid.gy & team at Open Science Monitoring Inititative (OSMI) as steering board member. Looking forward to work w/ Cécile Coulibaly, Moumita Koley, @susannanykyri.bsky.social & @jeroenson.bsky.social
open-science-monitoring.org/meet-the-fiv...
open-science-monitoring.org/meet-the-fiv...
Nice way to finish the year with such a quote in @science.org news: "Stefanie Haustein, an information scientist at the University of Ottawa, doesn’t buy publishers’ arguments."
Thank you @phiejacobs.bsky.social!
doi.org/10.1126/scie...
Thank you @phiejacobs.bsky.social!
doi.org/10.1126/scie...
December 16, 2025 at 2:39 PM
Nice way to finish the year with such a quote in @science.org news: "Stefanie Haustein, an information scientist at the University of Ottawa, doesn’t buy publishers’ arguments."
Thank you @phiejacobs.bsky.social!
doi.org/10.1126/scie...
Thank you @phiejacobs.bsky.social!
doi.org/10.1126/scie...
A great first day of conference in Mendoza, discussing many aspects relevant to the drain of scientific publishing
December 2, 2025 at 11:18 AM
A great first day of conference in Mendoza, discussing many aspects relevant to the drain of scientific publishing
Excited to discuss dilemmas of #openscience and research assessment reforms in Argentina the next couple of days. Thank you to hostess extraordinaire Fernanda Beigel for bringing us together in Mendoza 🇦🇷
December 1, 2025 at 12:24 PM
Excited to discuss dilemmas of #openscience and research assessment reforms in Argentina the next couple of days. Thank you to hostess extraordinaire Fernanda Beigel for bringing us together in Mendoza 🇦🇷
November 26, 2025 at 4:46 PM
We summarized the Drain paper in an LSE Impact blog post this week. Please share in your networks, ideally with those we are calling to action: research funders and university leadership
blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsoci... #AcademicSky #AcademicPublishing #OpenAccess #ScholComm
blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsoci... #AcademicSky #AcademicPublishing #OpenAccess #ScholComm
November 20, 2025 at 6:14 PM
We summarized the Drain paper in an LSE Impact blog post this week. Please share in your networks, ideally with those we are calling to action: research funders and university leadership
blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsoci... #AcademicSky #AcademicPublishing #OpenAccess #ScholComm
blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsoci... #AcademicSky #AcademicPublishing #OpenAccess #ScholComm
At our society journal QSS w/ MIT Press we are transparent about pricing and charge $750 ($1200) for (non)members. As you see in the breakdown, production, submission and hosting =75%=$ 562.50 direct.mit.edu/journals/pag... (2/n)
November 17, 2025 at 4:50 AM
At our society journal QSS w/ MIT Press we are transparent about pricing and charge $750 ($1200) for (non)members. As you see in the breakdown, production, submission and hosting =75%=$ 562.50 direct.mit.edu/journals/pag... (2/n)
Talking about our recent work on The Drain of Scientific Publishing at the Royal Society of Canada #CoEE2025 on a panel with @chadgaffield.bsky.social and @abizadeh.bsky.social. 10am in Viger, 8th floor @erudit.org #AcademicSky #RoyalSociety
November 15, 2025 at 2:37 PM
Talking about our recent work on The Drain of Scientific Publishing at the Royal Society of Canada #CoEE2025 on a panel with @chadgaffield.bsky.social and @abizadeh.bsky.social. 10am in Viger, 8th floor @erudit.org #AcademicSky #RoyalSociety
You might be interested in our preprint: arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820
November 15, 2025 at 11:17 AM
You might be interested in our preprint: arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820
Thank you for coming to my TED Talk 🎤
If you’ve read this far and still need convincing, please check out our preprint arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820 and this infographic: doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
10/10
If you’ve read this far and still need convincing, please check out our preprint arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820 and this infographic: doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
10/10
November 13, 2025 at 8:17 PM
Thank you for coming to my TED Talk 🎤
If you’ve read this far and still need convincing, please check out our preprint arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820 and this infographic: doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
10/10
If you’ve read this far and still need convincing, please check out our preprint arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820 and this infographic: doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
10/10
Looks at this, we're at over 200! Would love to see where these end up..
November 13, 2025 at 4:45 AM
Looks at this, we're at over 200! Would love to see where these end up..
I'd say that APCs made the extractive business more VISIBLE to authors but publishers have been milking libraries since the 1970s. That's still the case. For some recent data, here is the journal publishing market in $US based on @deltathink.bsky.social data (from their blog posts)
November 11, 2025 at 10:04 PM
I'd say that APCs made the extractive business more VISIBLE to authors but publishers have been milking libraries since the 1970s. That's still the case. For some recent data, here is the journal publishing market in $US based on @deltathink.bsky.social data (from their blog posts)
What an amazing little experiment! Highly recommend reading this post #OAWeek #AcademicSky
October 24, 2025 at 12:22 AM
What an amazing little experiment! Highly recommend reading this post #OAWeek #AcademicSky
Love this! Particularly this quote (see screenshot) which aligns quite a bit with a blog post I wrote last week: www.uottawa.ca/research-inn...
To be fair, I did only suggest 13 manageable changes easily implementable in the current “prison” but I’m not at all against burning it all down either 🔥🔥🔥
To be fair, I did only suggest 13 manageable changes easily implementable in the current “prison” but I’m not at all against burning it all down either 🔥🔥🔥
October 24, 2025 at 12:21 AM
Love this! Particularly this quote (see screenshot) which aligns quite a bit with a blog post I wrote last week: www.uottawa.ca/research-inn...
To be fair, I did only suggest 13 manageable changes easily implementable in the current “prison” but I’m not at all against burning it all down either 🔥🔥🔥
To be fair, I did only suggest 13 manageable changes easily implementable in the current “prison” but I’m not at all against burning it all down either 🔥🔥🔥
Slides for my #OAWeek talk @uottawabiblio.bsky.social @uottawa.ca today:
“Who owns our knowledge? A data feminist perspective on closed research infrastructure”
doi.org/10.5281/zeno... #ScholCommLab #openaccess #AcademicSky #datafeminism
“Who owns our knowledge? A data feminist perspective on closed research infrastructure”
doi.org/10.5281/zeno... #ScholCommLab #openaccess #AcademicSky #datafeminism
October 23, 2025 at 11:58 PM
Slides for my #OAWeek talk @uottawabiblio.bsky.social @uottawa.ca today:
“Who owns our knowledge? A data feminist perspective on closed research infrastructure”
doi.org/10.5281/zeno... #ScholCommLab #openaccess #AcademicSky #datafeminism
“Who owns our knowledge? A data feminist perspective on closed research infrastructure”
doi.org/10.5281/zeno... #ScholCommLab #openaccess #AcademicSky #datafeminism
Multitasking during #OAWeek: the pleasure of listening to this while putting the finishing touches on my own slides at @uottawabiblio.bsky.social
October 23, 2025 at 3:05 PM
Multitasking during #OAWeek: the pleasure of listening to this while putting the finishing touches on my own slides at @uottawabiblio.bsky.social
Quelle meilleure occasion que la #SemaineDuLibreAccès pour partager 13 actions concrètes vers une édition scientifique plus équitable et pérenne ? Des prépublications aux revues diamant, jusqu’au refus d’évaluer pour des éditeurs exploitants : chaque petit geste compte quand on agit collectivement.
October 22, 2025 at 8:05 PM
Quelle meilleure occasion que la #SemaineDuLibreAccès pour partager 13 actions concrètes vers une édition scientifique plus équitable et pérenne ? Des prépublications aux revues diamant, jusqu’au refus d’évaluer pour des éditeurs exploitants : chaque petit geste compte quand on agit collectivement.
What better time than #OAWeek to share 13 actions researchers can take for fairer, more sustainable publishing? From posting preprints to supporting diamond journals to refusing to review for exploitative publishers: each small action matters when we act collectively.
October 22, 2025 at 7:57 PM
What better time than #OAWeek to share 13 actions researchers can take for fairer, more sustainable publishing? From posting preprints to supporting diamond journals to refusing to review for exploitative publishers: each small action matters when we act collectively.
October 10, 2025 at 9:24 PM
Watching Kelly Cobey (@heartinstitute.bsky.social) and @lariviev.bsky.social during their expert hearing at Meeting No. 2 of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Science and Research (SRSR) right now. Too bad ParlVu is very shaky on my end..
September 15, 2025 at 4:50 PM
Watching Kelly Cobey (@heartinstitute.bsky.social) and @lariviev.bsky.social during their expert hearing at Meeting No. 2 of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Science and Research (SRSR) right now. Too bad ParlVu is very shaky on my end..
If you already read the #ScholCommLab blog last week, here's what's new in @lseimpactblog.bsky.social post:
We added layer of analysis for how NIH cap on APCs would affect large publishers. In raw dollars, the what NIH director calls "duopoly" Elsevier and Springer Nature would be affected most.
We added layer of analysis for how NIH cap on APCs would affect large publishers. In raw dollars, the what NIH director calls "duopoly" Elsevier and Springer Nature would be affected most.
September 11, 2025 at 5:02 PM
If you already read the #ScholCommLab blog last week, here's what's new in @lseimpactblog.bsky.social post:
We added layer of analysis for how NIH cap on APCs would affect large publishers. In raw dollars, the what NIH director calls "duopoly" Elsevier and Springer Nature would be affected most.
We added layer of analysis for how NIH cap on APCs would affect large publishers. In raw dollars, the what NIH director calls "duopoly" Elsevier and Springer Nature would be affected most.
Really sad to say goodbye to Doro Strecker @ibi-hu.bsky.social @humboldtuni.bsky.social who’s been visiting the #ScholCommLab @uottawa.ca for the last 6 weeks w/ help of a @berlinualliance.bsky.social scholarship. At least we had amazing weather today to enjoy a proper “vierte Mahlzeit” outside ☕️🍰
September 10, 2025 at 11:27 PM
Really sad to say goodbye to Doro Strecker @ibi-hu.bsky.social @humboldtuni.bsky.social who’s been visiting the #ScholCommLab @uottawa.ca for the last 6 weeks w/ help of a @berlinualliance.bsky.social scholarship. At least we had amazing weather today to enjoy a proper “vierte Mahlzeit” outside ☕️🍰
Not sure I get your question, but sounds like the figure you’re looking for is this one:
September 4, 2025 at 1:54 PM
Not sure I get your question, but sounds like the figure you’re looking for is this one:
We also find (again & again) that despite fully financed through subscriptions, APCs of hybrid journals exceed those of gold - clear disconnect between author fees and journal production cost 📖💸
📊Distribution of 2,228 journals across APC brackets: majority above $3K w/ hybrid fees higher than gold
📊Distribution of 2,228 journals across APC brackets: majority above $3K w/ hybrid fees higher than gold
September 4, 2025 at 1:47 PM
We also find (again & again) that despite fully financed through subscriptions, APCs of hybrid journals exceed those of gold - clear disconnect between author fees and journal production cost 📖💸
📊Distribution of 2,228 journals across APC brackets: majority above $3K w/ hybrid fees higher than gold
📊Distribution of 2,228 journals across APC brackets: majority above $3K w/ hybrid fees higher than gold